Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs)

Valeria Occelli, G. Esposito, P. Venuti, P. Walker, M. Zampini
{"title":"Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs)","authors":"Valeria Occelli, G. Esposito, P. Venuti, P. Walker, M. Zampini","doi":"10.1163/187847612X646668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The label ‘crossmodal correspondences’ has been used to define the nonarbitrary associations that appear to exist between different basic physical stimulus attributes in different sensory modalities. For instance, it has been consistently shown in the neurotypical population that higher pitched sounds are more frequently matched with visual patterns which are brighter, smaller, and sharper than those associated to lower pitched sounds. Some evidence suggests that patients with ASDs tend not to show this crossmodal preferential association pattern (e.g., curvilinear shapes and labial/lingual consonants vs. rectilinear shapes and plosive consonants). In the present study, we compared the performance of children with ASDs (6–15 years) and matched neurotypical controls in a non-verbal crossmodal correspondence task. The participants were asked to indicate which of two bouncing visual patterns was making a centrally located sound. In intermixed trials, the visual patterns varied in either size, surface brightness, or shape, whereas the sound varied in pitch. The results showed that, whereas the neurotypical controls reliably matched the higher pitched sound to a smaller and brighter visual pattern, the performance of participants with ASDs was at chance level. In the condition where the visual patterns differed in shape, no inter-group difference was observed. Children’s matching performance cannot be attributed to intensity matching or difficulties in understanding the instructions, which were controlled. These data suggest that the tendency to associate congruent visual and auditory features vary as a function of the presence of ASDs, possibly pointing to poorer capabilities to integrate auditory and visual inputs in this population.","PeriodicalId":49553,"journal":{"name":"Seeing and Perceiving","volume":"25 1","pages":"44-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187847612X646668","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seeing and Perceiving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/187847612X646668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The label ‘crossmodal correspondences’ has been used to define the nonarbitrary associations that appear to exist between different basic physical stimulus attributes in different sensory modalities. For instance, it has been consistently shown in the neurotypical population that higher pitched sounds are more frequently matched with visual patterns which are brighter, smaller, and sharper than those associated to lower pitched sounds. Some evidence suggests that patients with ASDs tend not to show this crossmodal preferential association pattern (e.g., curvilinear shapes and labial/lingual consonants vs. rectilinear shapes and plosive consonants). In the present study, we compared the performance of children with ASDs (6–15 years) and matched neurotypical controls in a non-verbal crossmodal correspondence task. The participants were asked to indicate which of two bouncing visual patterns was making a centrally located sound. In intermixed trials, the visual patterns varied in either size, surface brightness, or shape, whereas the sound varied in pitch. The results showed that, whereas the neurotypical controls reliably matched the higher pitched sound to a smaller and brighter visual pattern, the performance of participants with ASDs was at chance level. In the condition where the visual patterns differed in shape, no inter-group difference was observed. Children’s matching performance cannot be attributed to intensity matching or difficulties in understanding the instructions, which were controlled. These data suggest that the tendency to associate congruent visual and auditory features vary as a function of the presence of ASDs, possibly pointing to poorer capabilities to integrate auditory and visual inputs in this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症谱系障碍(ASDs)的视听跨模态对应关系
“跨模态对应”这个标签已经被用来定义在不同感觉模态中存在的不同基本物理刺激属性之间的非任意关联。例如,在神经正常的人群中一直显示,高音调的声音比低音调的声音更频繁地与更明亮、更小、更锐利的视觉模式相匹配。一些证据表明,asd患者往往不表现出这种跨模优先关联模式(例如,曲线形状和唇/舌辅音与直线形状和爆炸辅音)。在本研究中,我们比较了自闭症儿童(6-15岁)和匹配的神经正常对照在非语言跨模式通信任务中的表现。参与者被要求指出两种弹跳的视觉模式中哪一种发出了位于中心位置的声音。在混合实验中,视觉图案在大小、表面亮度或形状上有所不同,而声音则在音调上有所不同。结果表明,尽管神经正常的对照组可靠地将高音调的声音与更小、更亮的视觉模式相匹配,但自闭症患者的表现却处于偶然水平。在视觉图案形状不同的情况下,没有观察到组间差异。儿童的匹配表现不能归因于匹配的强度或理解指令的困难,这是有控制的。这些数据表明,随着自闭症的存在,将一致的视觉和听觉特征联系起来的倾向有所不同,这可能表明该人群整合听觉和视觉输入的能力较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seeing and Perceiving
Seeing and Perceiving BIOPHYSICS-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Chapter ten. Color Vision Chapter six. Brightness Constancy Chapter One. Our Idea of the Physical World Chapter nine. Optometrists, Ophthalmologists, Opticians: What They Do Chapter seven. Why the Rate of Unbleaching is Important
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1