Social Welfare or Moral Warfare?: Popular Resistance against Children’s Rights and Juvenile Justice in Contemporary Russia

IF 1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Childrens Rights Pub Date : 2016-12-20 DOI:10.1163/15718182-02404007
Tova Höjdestrand
{"title":"Social Welfare or Moral Warfare?: Popular Resistance against Children’s Rights and Juvenile Justice in Contemporary Russia","authors":"Tova Höjdestrand","doi":"10.1163/15718182-02404007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the mid-2000s, Russia has increased its efforts to strengthen the legal rights of children and to improve the systems of social assistance to vulnerable families in in line with the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child. The reform drive has met fierce resistance by a grassroots mobilization in defence of ‘traditional Russian family values’. Child rights are conceived of as weapons in a Western moral war against Russia, but simultaneously, the popular appeal of the campaign stems from a profound distrust in Russian state administrators, who purportedly use the CRC for personal gain. This paper suggests that this disbelief makes the protesters locate notions of citizenship primarily to the intimate social sphere, prioritizing ‘parental rights’ rather than ‘civil rights’ defined by the state-citizen relationship. It is also suggested that the confidence of citizens in their own state administration must be considered if the Convention is to be successfully implemented. (Less)","PeriodicalId":46399,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Childrens Rights","volume":"24 1","pages":"826-850"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15718182-02404007","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Childrens Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02404007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Since the mid-2000s, Russia has increased its efforts to strengthen the legal rights of children and to improve the systems of social assistance to vulnerable families in in line with the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child. The reform drive has met fierce resistance by a grassroots mobilization in defence of ‘traditional Russian family values’. Child rights are conceived of as weapons in a Western moral war against Russia, but simultaneously, the popular appeal of the campaign stems from a profound distrust in Russian state administrators, who purportedly use the CRC for personal gain. This paper suggests that this disbelief makes the protesters locate notions of citizenship primarily to the intimate social sphere, prioritizing ‘parental rights’ rather than ‘civil rights’ defined by the state-citizen relationship. It is also suggested that the confidence of citizens in their own state administration must be considered if the Convention is to be successfully implemented. (Less)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会福利还是道德战争?当代俄罗斯民众对儿童权利和少年司法的反抗
自2000年代中期以来,俄罗斯根据《联合国儿童权利公约》加强了儿童的合法权利,并改善了对弱势家庭的社会援助制度。这一改革举措遭到了捍卫“传统俄罗斯家庭价值观”的草根组织的强烈抵制。儿童权利被认为是西方对抗俄罗斯的道德战争的武器,但与此同时,这场运动的普遍吸引力源于对俄罗斯政府官员的深刻不信任,据称他们利用《儿童权利公约》谋取私利。本文认为,这种怀疑使抗议者将公民概念主要定位于亲密的社会领域,优先考虑“父母权利”,而不是由国家-公民关系定义的“公民权利”。有人还建议,如果要成功地执行《公约》,就必须考虑到公民对其国家行政当局的信任。(少)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Childrens Rights
International Journal of Childrens Rights SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
A Rights-Based Approach to Child Poverty Measurement and Child Rights Realisation in Zimbabwe Barbara Bennett Woodhouse, The Ecology of Childhood. How Our Changing World Threatens Children’s Rights Privacy as a New Component of “The Best Interests of the Child” in the New Digital Environment Unregistered Children: a Systematic Literature Review of Explanations and Consequences Associated with Failure to Fulfil Children’s Right to Registration Lydia Bracken, Same-Sex Parenting and the Best Interests Principle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1