Influence of cell printing on biological characters of chondrocytes.

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL International journal of clinical and experimental medicine Pub Date : 2015-10-15 DOI:10.1166/JBT.2016.1420
M. Qu, Xiaoyan. Gao, Yikang Hou, Congcong Shen, Yourong Xu, Ming-sheng Zhu, Hengjian Wang, Haisong Xu, G. Chai, Yan Zhang
{"title":"Influence of cell printing on biological characters of chondrocytes.","authors":"M. Qu, Xiaoyan. Gao, Yikang Hou, Congcong Shen, Yourong Xu, Ming-sheng Zhu, Hengjian Wang, Haisong Xu, G. Chai, Yan Zhang","doi":"10.1166/JBT.2016.1420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo establish a two-dimensional biological printing technique of chondrocytes and compare the difference of related biological characters between printed chondrocytes and unprinted cells so as to control the cell transfer process and keep cell viability after printing.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPrimary chondrocytes were obtained from human mature and fetal cartilage tissues and then were regularly sub-cultured to harvest cells at passage 2 (P2), which were adjusted to the single cell suspension at a density of 1×10(6)/mL. The experiment was divided into 2 groups: experimental group P2 chondrocytes were transferred by rapid prototype biological printer (driving voltage value 50 V, interval in x-axis 300 μm, interval in y-axis 1500 μm). Afterwards Live/Dead viability Kit and flow cytometry were respectively adopted to detect cell viability; CCK-8 Kit was adopted to detect cell proliferation viability; immunocytochemistry, immunofluorescence and RT-PCR was employed to identify related markers of chondrocytes; control group steps were the same as the printing group except that cell suspension received no printing.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry analyses showed that there was no significant difference between experimental group and control group in terms of cell viability. After 7-day in vitro culture, control group exhibited higher O.D values than experimental group from 2nd day to 7th day but there was no distinct difference between these two groups (P>0.05). Inverted microscope observation demonstrated that the morphology of these two groups had no significant difference either. Similarly, Immunocytochemistry, immunofluorescence and RT-PCR assays also showed that there was no significant difference in the protein and gene expression of type II collagen and aggrecan between these two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Cell printing has no distinctly negative effect on cell vitality, proliferation and phenotype of chondrocytes. Biological printing technique may provide a novel approach for realizing the oriented, quantificational and regular distribution of chondrocytes in a two-dimensional plane and lay the foundation for the construction of three-dimensional cell printing or even organ printing system.","PeriodicalId":13892,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","volume":"8 10 1","pages":"17471-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1166/JBT.2016.1420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To establish a two-dimensional biological printing technique of chondrocytes and compare the difference of related biological characters between printed chondrocytes and unprinted cells so as to control the cell transfer process and keep cell viability after printing. METHODS Primary chondrocytes were obtained from human mature and fetal cartilage tissues and then were regularly sub-cultured to harvest cells at passage 2 (P2), which were adjusted to the single cell suspension at a density of 1×10(6)/mL. The experiment was divided into 2 groups: experimental group P2 chondrocytes were transferred by rapid prototype biological printer (driving voltage value 50 V, interval in x-axis 300 μm, interval in y-axis 1500 μm). Afterwards Live/Dead viability Kit and flow cytometry were respectively adopted to detect cell viability; CCK-8 Kit was adopted to detect cell proliferation viability; immunocytochemistry, immunofluorescence and RT-PCR was employed to identify related markers of chondrocytes; control group steps were the same as the printing group except that cell suspension received no printing. RESULTS Fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry analyses showed that there was no significant difference between experimental group and control group in terms of cell viability. After 7-day in vitro culture, control group exhibited higher O.D values than experimental group from 2nd day to 7th day but there was no distinct difference between these two groups (P>0.05). Inverted microscope observation demonstrated that the morphology of these two groups had no significant difference either. Similarly, Immunocytochemistry, immunofluorescence and RT-PCR assays also showed that there was no significant difference in the protein and gene expression of type II collagen and aggrecan between these two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Cell printing has no distinctly negative effect on cell vitality, proliferation and phenotype of chondrocytes. Biological printing technique may provide a novel approach for realizing the oriented, quantificational and regular distribution of chondrocytes in a two-dimensional plane and lay the foundation for the construction of three-dimensional cell printing or even organ printing system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细胞打印对软骨细胞生物学特性的影响。
目的建立软骨细胞二维生物打印技术,比较打印软骨细胞与未打印软骨细胞相关生物学特性的差异,从而控制打印后的细胞转移过程,保持细胞活力。方法从人成熟软骨组织和胎儿软骨组织中获得原代软骨细胞,定期传代至2代(P2)收获细胞,调整为密度为1×10(6)/mL的单细胞悬液。实验分为两组:实验组采用快速原型生物打印机移植P2软骨细胞(驱动电压值50 V, x轴间隔300 μm, y轴间隔1500 μm)。分别采用活/死活力试剂盒和流式细胞术检测细胞活力;采用CCK-8试剂盒检测细胞增殖活力;采用免疫细胞化学、免疫荧光和RT-PCR检测软骨细胞相关标志物;对照组的步骤与打印组相同,只是细胞悬液不进行打印。结果荧光显微镜和流式细胞术分析显示,实验组与对照组的细胞活力差异无统计学意义。体外培养7 d后,第2 ~ 7 d,对照组的od值高于试验组,但两组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。倒置显微镜观察显示,两组的形态学也无显著差异。同样,免疫细胞化学、免疫荧光和RT-PCR检测也显示,两组间II型胶原和聚集蛋白的蛋白和基因表达差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论细胞打印对软骨细胞的活力、增殖和表型无明显的负面影响。生物打印技术可为实现软骨细胞在二维平面上定向、定量和规则分布提供一种新途径,为构建三维细胞打印甚至器官打印系统奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A case report of moderate COVID-19 with an extremely long-term viral shedding period in China Lentivirus-Mediated knockdown of tectonic family member 1 inhibits medulloblastoma cell proliferation [Retraction]. Classification of MRI and psychological testing data based on support vector machine. Nucleostemin regulates proliferation and migration of gastric cancer and correlates with its malignancy [Retraction]. Effect of lipiodol and methylene blue on the thoracoscopic preoperative positioning [Retraction].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1