The social limits of state control: Time, the industrial wage relation and social identity in Stalinist Hungary, 1948-1953

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of Historical Sociology Pub Date : 1999-09-01 DOI:10.1163/9789004270329_006
M. Pittaway
{"title":"The social limits of state control: Time, the industrial wage relation and social identity in Stalinist Hungary, 1948-1953","authors":"M. Pittaway","doi":"10.1163/9789004270329_006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter demonstrates that 'hegemonic' factory regimes, characterised by a high degree of cooperation between at least a core of the workforce and management, dominated industry in the Stalinist years, as much as they were to characterise the conditions of production in a climate of economic reform. Furthermore, it shows that they emerged from economic tensions created by the Stalinist state and by worker responses to them. An examination of how such 'hegemonic' factory regimes arose suggests a major revision of the traditional image of Stalinism as collectivist. The state attempted to use systems of remuneration on the shop floor to bind workers to the goals of the plan. These systems of remuneration were individual rather than collective, suggesting that at the heart of classical central planning lay an apparent paradox between institutional centralisation and a high degree of individualisation at the point of production. Keywords: economic reform; hegemonic factory regimes; industrial wage relation; institutionalisation; social identity; Stalinist Hungary; Stalinist years","PeriodicalId":46194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270329_006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This chapter demonstrates that 'hegemonic' factory regimes, characterised by a high degree of cooperation between at least a core of the workforce and management, dominated industry in the Stalinist years, as much as they were to characterise the conditions of production in a climate of economic reform. Furthermore, it shows that they emerged from economic tensions created by the Stalinist state and by worker responses to them. An examination of how such 'hegemonic' factory regimes arose suggests a major revision of the traditional image of Stalinism as collectivist. The state attempted to use systems of remuneration on the shop floor to bind workers to the goals of the plan. These systems of remuneration were individual rather than collective, suggesting that at the heart of classical central planning lay an apparent paradox between institutional centralisation and a high degree of individualisation at the point of production. Keywords: economic reform; hegemonic factory regimes; industrial wage relation; institutionalisation; social identity; Stalinist Hungary; Stalinist years
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家控制的社会限制:时间、工业工资关系和斯大林主义匈牙利的社会认同,1948-1953
本章表明,“霸权”工厂政权,其特征是至少核心劳动力和管理层之间的高度合作,在斯大林主义时期主导了工业,正如它们在经济改革的气候中描述了生产条件一样。此外,它表明,它们是从斯大林主义国家和工人对它们的反应所造成的经济紧张中出现的。对这种“霸权”工厂政权如何产生的研究表明,对斯大林主义作为集体主义的传统形象进行了重大修改。国家试图利用车间的薪酬制度来约束工人实现计划的目标。这些薪酬制度是个人的,而不是集体的,这表明,在传统中央计划的核心,在制度上的集中与生产上的高度个性化之间存在着明显的矛盾。关键词:经济体制改革;霸权工厂政权;产业工资关系;制度化;社会身份;匈牙利斯大林主义;斯大林的年
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Edited by a distinguished international panel of historians, anthropologists, geographers and sociologists, the Journal of Historical Sociology is both interdisciplinary in approach and innovative in content. As well as refereed articles, the journal presents review essays and commentary in its Issues and Agendas section, and aims to provoke discussion and debate.
期刊最新文献
Political Economies of Knowledge Production: On and Around Academic Dependency In What Ways We Depend: Academic Dependency Theory and the Development of East Asian Sociology Rethinking the Rise of China: A Postcolonial Critique of China and a Chinese Critique of the Postcolonial Are We Still Dependent? Academic Dependency Theory After 20 Years The Arab Spring and Revolutionary Theory: An Intervention in a Debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1