Observed Turbulent Dissipation Rate in a Landfalling Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-14 DOI:10.1175/jas-d-22-0265.1
Qingguo Fang, Kekuan Chu, Bowen Zhou, Xunlai Chen, Zhen Peng, Chunsheng Zhang, M. Luo, Chunyang Zhao
{"title":"Observed Turbulent Dissipation Rate in a Landfalling Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer","authors":"Qingguo Fang, Kekuan Chu, Bowen Zhou, Xunlai Chen, Zhen Peng, Chunsheng Zhang, M. Luo, Chunyang Zhao","doi":"10.1175/jas-d-22-0265.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nBased on turbulence measurements from sonic anemometers instrumented at multiple levels on a 356 m-tall meteorological tower located on the south coast of China, an observation study of the turbulent dissipation rate (ε) in a landfalling tropical cyclone boundary layer (TCBL) is conducted. Three indirect methods (i.e., the power spectra, the 2nd- and the 3rd-order structure functions) are compared for the calculation of ε. The 3rd-order structure function computes the smallest ε among the 3 methods, but shows the largest uncertainty. The 2nd-order structure function gives similar ε estimates as the power spectra, and is adopted for its reduced uncertainty. The measured ε in the landfalling TCBL is of O(10−1) m2 s−3, much greater than typical atmospheric boundary layer values as well as oceanic TCBL values. ε is found to scale with the local friction velocity rather than the surface friction velocity, implying a highly localized nature of turbulence. Conventional parameterizations of ε are evaluated against observations. Process-based ε models assuming a local balance between shear production and dissipation prove inadequate, as shear production merely accounts for half of the dissipation away from the surface. In comparison, scaling-based ε models used by planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes are more advantageous. With both tuning of the model coefficients and adjustment of the dissipation length scale, the performance of an ε model in a widely used PBL scheme is shown to produce similar values to the observations.","PeriodicalId":17231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-22-0265.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Based on turbulence measurements from sonic anemometers instrumented at multiple levels on a 356 m-tall meteorological tower located on the south coast of China, an observation study of the turbulent dissipation rate (ε) in a landfalling tropical cyclone boundary layer (TCBL) is conducted. Three indirect methods (i.e., the power spectra, the 2nd- and the 3rd-order structure functions) are compared for the calculation of ε. The 3rd-order structure function computes the smallest ε among the 3 methods, but shows the largest uncertainty. The 2nd-order structure function gives similar ε estimates as the power spectra, and is adopted for its reduced uncertainty. The measured ε in the landfalling TCBL is of O(10−1) m2 s−3, much greater than typical atmospheric boundary layer values as well as oceanic TCBL values. ε is found to scale with the local friction velocity rather than the surface friction velocity, implying a highly localized nature of turbulence. Conventional parameterizations of ε are evaluated against observations. Process-based ε models assuming a local balance between shear production and dissipation prove inadequate, as shear production merely accounts for half of the dissipation away from the surface. In comparison, scaling-based ε models used by planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes are more advantageous. With both tuning of the model coefficients and adjustment of the dissipation length scale, the performance of an ε model in a widely used PBL scheme is shown to produce similar values to the observations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
登陆热带气旋边界层湍流耗散率观测
利用位于中国南部沿海356 m高的气象塔上多水平声速仪的湍流测量数据,对登陆热带气旋边界层(TCBL)的湍流耗散率(ε)进行了观测研究。比较了三种计算ε的间接方法(即功率谱法、二阶和三阶结构函数法)。三阶结构函数在三种方法中计算的ε值最小,但不确定性最大。二阶结构函数给出了与功率谱相似的ε估计,并因其降低了不确定性而被采用。着陆TCBL的实测ε值为0(10−1)m2 s−3,远远大于典型的大气边界层值和海洋TCBL值。发现ε与局部摩擦速度成比例,而不是与表面摩擦速度成比例,这意味着湍流的高度局域性。ε的常规参数化是根据观测值进行评估的。假设剪切产生和耗散局部平衡的基于过程的ε模型是不充分的,因为剪切产生只占离开地表耗散的一半。相比之下,行星边界层(PBL)方案采用的基于标度的ε模型更具优势。通过模型系数的调整和耗散长度尺度的调整,在广泛使用的PBL格式中,ε模型的性能与观测值相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
196
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (JAS) publishes basic research related to the physics, dynamics, and chemistry of the atmosphere of Earth and other planets, with emphasis on the quantitative and deductive aspects of the subject. The links provide detailed information for readers, authors, reviewers, and those who wish to submit a manuscript for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Synchronous Papillary and Follicular Carcinoma with Scalp and Nodal Metastasis: A case report with review of literature. Characteristics of Turbulence Intermittency, Fine Structures, and Flux Correction in the Taklimakan Desert Tropospheric thermal forcing of the stratosphere through quasi-balanced dynamics Asymmetry of the Distribution of Vertical Velocities of the Extratropical Atmosphere in Theory, Models and Reanalysis A new pathway for tornadogenesis exposed by numerical simulations of supercells in turbulent environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1