A constructivist approach to experiential foundations of mathematical concepts

IF 2.2 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Constructivist Foundations Pub Date : 2007-01-01 DOI:10.1163/9789087903480_020
M. Larochelle, E. Ackermann, G. Fourez, J. Désautels, L. Steffe, Kenneth Tobin
{"title":"A constructivist approach to experiential foundations of mathematical concepts","authors":"M. Larochelle, E. Ackermann, G. Fourez, J. Désautels, L. Steffe, Kenneth Tobin","doi":"10.1163/9789087903480_020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last decade, radical constructivism has gained a certain currency in the fields of science and mathematics education. Although cognitive constructivists have occasionally referred to the intuitionist approach to the foundational problems in mathematics, no effort has so far been made to outline what a constructivist’s own approach might be. This paper attempts a start in that direction. Whitehead’s description of three processes involved in criticising mathematical thinking (1925) is used to show discrepancies between a traditional epistemological stance and the constructivist approach to knowing and communication. The bulk of the paper then suggests tentative itineraries for the progression from elementary experiential situations to the abstraction of the concepts of unit, plurality, number, point, line, and plane, whose relation to sensory– motor experience is usually ignored or distorted in mathematics instruction. There follows a discussion of the question of certainty in logical deduction and arithmetic. Mathematics is the science of acts without things—and through this, of things one can define by acts.—Paul Valéry (1935, p.811)","PeriodicalId":39075,"journal":{"name":"Constructivist Foundations","volume":"1 1","pages":"205-224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constructivist Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903480_020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

During the last decade, radical constructivism has gained a certain currency in the fields of science and mathematics education. Although cognitive constructivists have occasionally referred to the intuitionist approach to the foundational problems in mathematics, no effort has so far been made to outline what a constructivist’s own approach might be. This paper attempts a start in that direction. Whitehead’s description of three processes involved in criticising mathematical thinking (1925) is used to show discrepancies between a traditional epistemological stance and the constructivist approach to knowing and communication. The bulk of the paper then suggests tentative itineraries for the progression from elementary experiential situations to the abstraction of the concepts of unit, plurality, number, point, line, and plane, whose relation to sensory– motor experience is usually ignored or distorted in mathematics instruction. There follows a discussion of the question of certainty in logical deduction and arithmetic. Mathematics is the science of acts without things—and through this, of things one can define by acts.—Paul Valéry (1935, p.811)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数学概念经验基础的建构主义方法
在过去的十年里,激进的建构主义在科学和数学教育领域获得了一定的流行。尽管认知建构主义者偶尔会提到直觉主义方法来解决数学中的基本问题,但迄今为止还没有人努力概述建构主义者自己的方法可能是什么。本文试图从这个方向开始。怀特黑德(Whitehead)对批判数学思维的三个过程的描述(1925年)被用来表明传统认识论立场与建构主义认识和交流方法之间的差异。然后,论文的大部分内容提出了从基本经验情境到抽象的单位、复数、数、点、线、面等概念的初步发展路线,这些概念与感觉运动经验的关系在数学教学中通常被忽视或扭曲。接着讨论了逻辑演绎和算术中的确定性问题。数学是研究无事物的行为的科学——通过这种科学,人们可以用行为来定义事物。——保罗·瓦尔杰里(1935,第811页)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Constructivist Foundations
Constructivist Foundations Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
21.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Constructivist Foundations (CF) is an international peer-reviewed e-journal focusing on the multidisciplinary study of the philosophical and scientific foundations and applications of constructivism and related disciplines. The journal promotes interdisciplinary discussion and cooperation among researchers and theorists working in many diverse fields such as artificial intelligence, cognitive science, biology, neuroscience, psychology, educational research, linguistics, communication science, sociology, mathematics, computer science, and philosophy. Constructivist approaches covered in the journal include the theory of autopoietic systems, enactivism, radical constructivism, second-order cybernetics, neurophenomenology, constructionism, and non-dualizing philosophy.
期刊最新文献
The Plasticity of the Bodily Self: Head Movements in Bodily Illusions and Their Relation to Gallagher’s Body Image and Body Schema A Constructivist Curriculum Open Peer Commentary: Wielding the Cybernetic Scythe in the Blunting Undergrowth of Psychological Confusion Open Peer Commentary: To What Extent Can Second-Order Cybernetics Be a Foundation for Psychology? Open Peer Commentary: Remarks from a Continental Philosophy Point of View
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1