Cognitive Mechanisms Reciprocally Transmit Vulnerability between Depressive and Somatic Symptoms

Q1 Psychology Depression Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2015-12-09 DOI:10.1155/2015/250594
K. Harding, Karly M. Murphy, A. Mezulis
{"title":"Cognitive Mechanisms Reciprocally Transmit Vulnerability between Depressive and Somatic Symptoms","authors":"K. Harding, Karly M. Murphy, A. Mezulis","doi":"10.1155/2015/250594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite high comorbidity between depressive and somatic symptoms, cognitive mechanisms that transmit vulnerability between symptom clusters are largely unknown. Dampening, positive rumination, and brooding are three cognitive predictors of depression, with rumination theoretically indicated as a transdiagnostic vulnerability through amplifying and diminishing affect in response to events. Specifically, the excess negative affect and lack of positive affect characteristic of depressive symptoms and underlying somatic symptoms may cause and be caused by cognitive responses to events. Therefore, the current study examined whether comorbidity between depressive and somatic symptoms may be explained by the cognitive mechanisms of dampening and positive rumination in response to positive events and brooding in response to negative events among adults (N = 321) across eight weeks of assessment. We hypothesized that greater dampening and brooding would reciprocally predict greater depressive and somatic symptoms, while greater positive rumination would reciprocally predict fewer depressive and somatic symptoms. Mediation analyses in AMOS 22 indicated that dampening and brooding mediated reciprocal pathways between depressive and somatic symptoms, but positive rumination did not. Findings propose dampening and brooding as mechanisms of the reciprocal relationship between depressive and somatic symptoms through diminishing positive affect and amplifying negative affect in response to positive and negative events.","PeriodicalId":38441,"journal":{"name":"Depression Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/250594","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/250594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Despite high comorbidity between depressive and somatic symptoms, cognitive mechanisms that transmit vulnerability between symptom clusters are largely unknown. Dampening, positive rumination, and brooding are three cognitive predictors of depression, with rumination theoretically indicated as a transdiagnostic vulnerability through amplifying and diminishing affect in response to events. Specifically, the excess negative affect and lack of positive affect characteristic of depressive symptoms and underlying somatic symptoms may cause and be caused by cognitive responses to events. Therefore, the current study examined whether comorbidity between depressive and somatic symptoms may be explained by the cognitive mechanisms of dampening and positive rumination in response to positive events and brooding in response to negative events among adults (N = 321) across eight weeks of assessment. We hypothesized that greater dampening and brooding would reciprocally predict greater depressive and somatic symptoms, while greater positive rumination would reciprocally predict fewer depressive and somatic symptoms. Mediation analyses in AMOS 22 indicated that dampening and brooding mediated reciprocal pathways between depressive and somatic symptoms, but positive rumination did not. Findings propose dampening and brooding as mechanisms of the reciprocal relationship between depressive and somatic symptoms through diminishing positive affect and amplifying negative affect in response to positive and negative events.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知机制在抑郁和躯体症状之间相互传递脆弱性
尽管抑郁和躯体症状之间有很高的共病性,但在症状群之间传递易感性的认知机制在很大程度上是未知的。消沉、积极反刍和沉思是抑郁症的三个认知预测因素,反刍在理论上被认为是一种跨诊断的脆弱性,通过放大和减少对事件的反应。具体来说,抑郁症状和潜在躯体症状所特有的过度消极影响和缺乏积极影响,可能引起对事件的认知反应,也可能由认知反应引起。因此,目前的研究考察了抑郁和躯体症状之间的共病是否可以通过认知机制来解释,即对积极事件做出反应时的抑制和积极反刍,以及对消极事件做出反应时的沉思(N = 321)。我们假设,更大的压抑和沉思会相互预测更大的抑郁和躯体症状,而更大的积极反刍会相互预测更少的抑郁和躯体症状。AMOS 22的中介分析表明,压抑和沉思介导抑郁和躯体症状之间的相互通路,而积极反刍则没有。研究结果表明,抑制和沉思是抑郁和躯体症状之间相互关系的机制,通过减少积极影响和放大消极影响来应对积极和消极事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Depression Research and Treatment
Depression Research and Treatment Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety and Its Association with Sleep Quality in the First-Year Medical Science Students Common Mental Disorder and Associated Factors among Women Attending Antenatal Care Follow-Up in North Wollo Public Health Facilities, Amhara Region, Northeast Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study Gratitude and Religiosity in Psychiatric Inpatients with Depression. Developing a Depression Care Model for the Hill Tribes: A Family- and Community-Based Participatory Research. Network Structure of Comorbidity Patterns in U.S. Adults with Depression: A National Study Based on Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1