Detection of American alligators in isolated, seasonal wetlands

A. Subalusky, Lee FitzGerald, L. Smith
{"title":"Detection of American alligators in isolated, seasonal wetlands","authors":"A. Subalusky, Lee FitzGerald, L. Smith","doi":"10.1163/157075408X386132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the American alligator has been well-studied in coastal marshes and large reservoirs, very few studies have taken place in the isolated, seasonal wetlands that occur within the inland portion of the alligator’s range. Understanding alligator populations in these systems is important because, although they are subject to the same management strategies and regulations as their more well-studied counterparts, they may have markedly different population dynamics and densities. Additionally, understanding patterns of alligator presence in isolated, seasonal wetlands is important to understanding how alligators may affect these critical habitats as ecosystem engineers. However, survey methods designed for large, open water systems may not work in these small, vegetated wetlands, and their efficacy in this habitat has yet to be documented. We conducted eyeshine surveys for alligators along walking transects through isolated, seasonal wetlands in southwest Georgia. We used a double-observer method with a Huggins closed capture analysis to determine the detection probability of this method, to model the effects of observer and wetland type on that parameter and to estimate abundance. We found that detection probability for eyeshine surveys under the best-supported model was 57%, between 2 and 5 times higher than documented in other habitats. We then compared eyeshine surveys with systematic trapping to ascertain which components of the population were more likely to be detected by each method. Both methods were effective in detecting a range of size classes in the wetlands; however, the two methods were most effective when used in concert. Wildlife biologists studying population trends and establishing harvest quotas can use this information to design surveys in the inland portion of the alligator’s range. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2009","PeriodicalId":55499,"journal":{"name":"Applied Herpetology","volume":"6 1","pages":"199-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/157075408X386132","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/157075408X386132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Although the American alligator has been well-studied in coastal marshes and large reservoirs, very few studies have taken place in the isolated, seasonal wetlands that occur within the inland portion of the alligator’s range. Understanding alligator populations in these systems is important because, although they are subject to the same management strategies and regulations as their more well-studied counterparts, they may have markedly different population dynamics and densities. Additionally, understanding patterns of alligator presence in isolated, seasonal wetlands is important to understanding how alligators may affect these critical habitats as ecosystem engineers. However, survey methods designed for large, open water systems may not work in these small, vegetated wetlands, and their efficacy in this habitat has yet to be documented. We conducted eyeshine surveys for alligators along walking transects through isolated, seasonal wetlands in southwest Georgia. We used a double-observer method with a Huggins closed capture analysis to determine the detection probability of this method, to model the effects of observer and wetland type on that parameter and to estimate abundance. We found that detection probability for eyeshine surveys under the best-supported model was 57%, between 2 and 5 times higher than documented in other habitats. We then compared eyeshine surveys with systematic trapping to ascertain which components of the population were more likely to be detected by each method. Both methods were effective in detecting a range of size classes in the wetlands; however, the two methods were most effective when used in concert. Wildlife biologists studying population trends and establishing harvest quotas can use this information to design surveys in the inland portion of the alligator’s range. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2009
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在孤立的季节性湿地发现美洲短吻鳄
尽管人们在沿海沼泽和大型水库中对美洲短吻鳄进行了充分的研究,但在短吻鳄活动范围内内陆地区的孤立的季节性湿地中进行的研究却很少。了解这些系统中短吻鳄的数量是很重要的,因为尽管它们受到与更充分研究的同类相同的管理策略和法规的约束,但它们可能具有明显不同的种群动态和密度。此外,作为生态系统工程师,了解短吻鳄在孤立的季节性湿地中的存在模式对于了解短吻鳄如何影响这些关键栖息地非常重要。然而,为大型开放水域系统设计的调查方法可能不适用于这些小型植被湿地,并且它们在该栖息地的有效性尚未得到记录。我们在乔治亚州西南部孤立的季节性湿地的步行横断面上对短吻鳄进行了眼睛发亮的调查。我们使用双观测者方法和哈金斯闭合捕获分析来确定该方法的检测概率,模拟观测者和湿地类型对该参数的影响,并估计丰度。我们发现,在最佳支持模型下,对眼睛进行调查的检测概率为57%,比在其他栖息地记录的高2到5倍。然后,我们比较了闪光调查和系统诱捕,以确定每种方法更有可能检测到种群的哪些组成部分。这两种方法都能有效地检测湿地的各种大小类别;然而,这两种方法在协同使用时是最有效的。野生动物生物学家研究鳄鱼数量趋势和建立捕捞配额,可以利用这些信息在短吻鳄活动范围的内陆地区设计调查。©Koninklijke Brill NV,莱顿,2009
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The first record of Ramphotyphlops braminus from the Isle of Pines, New Caledonia New island records for Tantilla melanocephala (Squamata: Colubridae) on the Grenada Bank Alien Reptiles and Amphibians: A Scientific Compendium and Analysis. The persistence of Anolis trinitatis as a naturalized lizard in Trinidad against hybridization pressure with Anolis aeneus The terrestrial herpetofauna of Martinique: Past, present, future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1