Book Review and Note: In Religion Good for Your Health?

John W. Vlainic
{"title":"Book Review and Note: In Religion Good for Your Health?","authors":"John W. Vlainic","doi":"10.1177/002234090005400418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ogy of pastoral care...religious rituals and symbolism...religious research?\" (p. 14). He also asked whether CPE should playa role in training lay people (p. 13). Oglesby challenged the organization to focus on the \"greater involvement of women in CPE at all levels\" and to \"break out of its middle-class shell\" (p. 34). In response to Oglesby, Thomas describes the emerging role of women in CPE since 1975. In addition to an increase in female supervisors, women became more active in governance. Joan Hemenway was the first Regional Director (Eastern Region) in 1983. Kathy Turner (1992) andJo Clare Wilson (1998) were the first female Presidents. The increase in female supervisors changed the very nature of CPE. Quoting several female supervisors, Thomas points out that women became more than nurturing mothers, they helped the ACPE face \"the sexual dynamic inherent in the supervisor-student relationships, including misuse of power by male supervisors on some occasions\" (pp. 50-51). Regarding its middle-class shell, Thomas points out that along with an increase in female supervisors, came an increased emphasis in religious diversity (an increase in Jewish and Roman Catholic involvement as well as other world religions) and multicultural involvement (the multicultural network had over 300 participants at its February 2000 meeting). Perhaps its greatest indication of inclusiveness is seen in the 1979 formation of the now Gay/Lesbian network. In response to Powell, Thomas presents statistics showing that the ACPE has seen an increase in laity involvement and a greater focus on spirituality and research over the last twenty-five years. He notes, however, that none of these changes could have occurred if supervisors had not been willing to adjust to changing times. In 1975 Powell reminded supervisors that they would \"provide the current context and answers\" (p. 14) to the challenges before them. As Thomas puts it, 'What was and is unique about the CPE experience was not that CPE had created a new model, but that it had blended together in the person of the Supervisor a unique individual who was willing to live on the 'boundaries'\" (p. 107). I found A 'Snap Shot' History a pleasant and interesting journey, as ifI were sitting with John looking at his photo album of the ACPE. The great strength of this book is that Thomas tells a powerful and important story of how the ACPE has faced its challenges in the last twenty-five years. Indeed, referring to the last 75 years, he notes, \"it has changed the health and welfare institutions of the United States...\" (p. 108). As is the case with most photo albums, not every picture interested me. Also, a significant drawback is that Thomas shows us primarily the good pictures, such as the student testimonies of the Ah ha experiences. Little attention is given to the Uh oh and Oh no experiences. Thus, we see no testimonies from dissatisfied students. Nonetheless, those with any CPE experience will find A 'Snap Shot' History a valuable resource. It will be of even greater value to beginning students and those unfamiliar with CPE such as hospital administrators who can benefit from hearing the ACPE story.","PeriodicalId":77221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pastoral care","volume":"54 1","pages":"478 - 480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/002234090005400418","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pastoral care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/002234090005400418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ogy of pastoral care...religious rituals and symbolism...religious research?" (p. 14). He also asked whether CPE should playa role in training lay people (p. 13). Oglesby challenged the organization to focus on the "greater involvement of women in CPE at all levels" and to "break out of its middle-class shell" (p. 34). In response to Oglesby, Thomas describes the emerging role of women in CPE since 1975. In addition to an increase in female supervisors, women became more active in governance. Joan Hemenway was the first Regional Director (Eastern Region) in 1983. Kathy Turner (1992) andJo Clare Wilson (1998) were the first female Presidents. The increase in female supervisors changed the very nature of CPE. Quoting several female supervisors, Thomas points out that women became more than nurturing mothers, they helped the ACPE face "the sexual dynamic inherent in the supervisor-student relationships, including misuse of power by male supervisors on some occasions" (pp. 50-51). Regarding its middle-class shell, Thomas points out that along with an increase in female supervisors, came an increased emphasis in religious diversity (an increase in Jewish and Roman Catholic involvement as well as other world religions) and multicultural involvement (the multicultural network had over 300 participants at its February 2000 meeting). Perhaps its greatest indication of inclusiveness is seen in the 1979 formation of the now Gay/Lesbian network. In response to Powell, Thomas presents statistics showing that the ACPE has seen an increase in laity involvement and a greater focus on spirituality and research over the last twenty-five years. He notes, however, that none of these changes could have occurred if supervisors had not been willing to adjust to changing times. In 1975 Powell reminded supervisors that they would "provide the current context and answers" (p. 14) to the challenges before them. As Thomas puts it, 'What was and is unique about the CPE experience was not that CPE had created a new model, but that it had blended together in the person of the Supervisor a unique individual who was willing to live on the 'boundaries'" (p. 107). I found A 'Snap Shot' History a pleasant and interesting journey, as ifI were sitting with John looking at his photo album of the ACPE. The great strength of this book is that Thomas tells a powerful and important story of how the ACPE has faced its challenges in the last twenty-five years. Indeed, referring to the last 75 years, he notes, "it has changed the health and welfare institutions of the United States..." (p. 108). As is the case with most photo albums, not every picture interested me. Also, a significant drawback is that Thomas shows us primarily the good pictures, such as the student testimonies of the Ah ha experiences. Little attention is given to the Uh oh and Oh no experiences. Thus, we see no testimonies from dissatisfied students. Nonetheless, those with any CPE experience will find A 'Snap Shot' History a valuable resource. It will be of even greater value to beginning students and those unfamiliar with CPE such as hospital administrators who can benefit from hearing the ACPE story.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评和注释:信仰宗教对你的健康有益吗?
教牧关怀学……宗教仪式和象征意义……宗教研究?”(p。14)。他还询问CPE是否应该在培训非专业人员方面发挥作用(第13页)。奥格尔斯比要求该组织把重点放在“让妇女更多地参与各级的持续教育教育”和“打破中产阶级的外壳”(第34页)。作为对Oglesby的回应,Thomas描述了自1975年以来女性在CPE中的新兴角色。除了女性主管的增加,女性在治理中也变得更加积极。Joan Hemenway于1983年担任首任区域主任(东区)。凯西·特纳(1992年)和乔·克莱尔·威尔逊(1998年)是美国第一位女总统。女性主管的增加改变了CPE的本质。托马斯引用了几位女性导师的话,指出女性不仅仅是养育孩子的母亲,她们还帮助ACPE面对“导师与学生关系中固有的性动力,包括男性导师在某些情况下滥用权力”(第50-51页)。关于它的中产阶级外壳,托马斯指出,随着女性主管的增加,宗教多样性(犹太教和罗马天主教以及其他世界宗教的参与增加)和多元文化参与(多元文化网络在2000年2月的会议上有300多名参与者)得到了越来越多的重视。也许最能体现其包容性的是1979年形成的现在的同性恋网络。作为对鲍威尔的回应,托马斯提出的统计数据显示,在过去的25年里,ACPE已经看到了俗人参与的增加,并且更加关注灵性和研究。然而,他指出,如果管理者不愿意适应不断变化的时代,这些变化都不可能发生。1975年,鲍威尔提醒监管人员,他们将“提供当前的背景和答案”(第14页),以应对他们面前的挑战。正如托马斯所说,“CPE经历的独特之处并不在于CPE创造了一种新的模式,而是在于它在导师身上融合了一个愿意在‘边界’上生活的独特个体”(第107页)。我发现《抓拍史》是一段愉快而有趣的旅程,就像我和约翰坐在一起看他的ACPE相册一样。这本书的强大之处在于,托马斯讲述了ACPE在过去25年里如何面对挑战的一个有力而重要的故事。事实上,谈到过去的75年,他指出,“它改变了美国的卫生和福利机构……”(p。108)。和大多数相册一样,并不是每一张照片都让我感兴趣。此外,一个明显的缺点是,托马斯主要向我们展示好的图片,如学生见证的阿哈经验。很少有人注意到“哦哦”和“哦没有”的经历。因此,我们没有看到不满的学生的证词。尽管如此,那些有CPE经验的人会发现“Snap Shot”历史是一个宝贵的资源。对于初学者和那些不熟悉CPE的人,如医院管理人员,它将更有价值,他们可以从听到ACPE的故事中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The anti-pastoral tradition Constructions of Arcadia Georgic literature Four kinds of pastoral Post-pastoral
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1