Book Review: Adolescents in Crisis

D. Grossoehme
{"title":"Book Review: Adolescents in Crisis","authors":"D. Grossoehme","doi":"10.1177/002234090105500420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tant section on grief. They sensitively represent the complex interplay between the reliving of past victimization and, through projection, the subtle potential for re-victimizing others. There is just one caution to be raised in this section pertaining to couples' therapy. The battered women's movement has long cautioned against couples' therapy where there is ongoing violence. Victims often cannot safely share deep experiences without risking retaliation. Therapists do need tools to address intense, chaotic couples' dynamics. At the same time, the authors' depth-oriented couples' method needs stronger safeguards against recurrence of violence, together with a more adequate analysis of power in intimate relationships, and how patriarchal privilege continues to reinforce violence against women. In Part III in general, \"evil\" rather fades from the picture, and the focus shifts mainly to clinical treatment of trauma. Parts II and III might both be strengthened by a more thorough integration of the clinical theory with explicitly religious language about God, sin, and theodicy (the authors' starting point in Part I). Part IV, then, which calls for a prophetic stance, represents a welcome return of theological language. For this reader, this was the most exciting and integrative section of the book. The authors argue against a splitting of prophetic response from pastoral care, and frame pastoral counseling itself as a form of cultural critique. They argue for an end in teaching and practice to a view of pastoral care and counseling as standing in opposition to social and political critique, and call for an integration of the two into a creative, holistic response to evil in all its guises. The strength of the book, its groundedness in clients' own experiences of evil and trauma, also in one way became its main weakness. In pastoral counseling, as in the counseling field in general, the vast majority of both counselors and clients are middle-class and white. Available forms of counseling have tended, in turn, to be captivated by medical and managed care models that have embedded racial and class privilege and cultural assumptions. By drawing on their own clinical experience with abuse survivors, the authors' account of evil and trauma stays experiencenear to their own clients' stories, but there is no explicit mention of race, class, sexual orientation, or social oppression. The authors' discussion of evil in Part I actually offered, without naming racism as such, a compelling description of the damages inflicted not only by sexual abuse but by racism and other systemic evils. Because the book is not intended solely as a book on sexual or domestic violence, it would have been enriched by more multi-cultural case examples (perhaps drawing from other practitioners working in different contexts), and by explicit references, both theoretical and case-related, to the racism, classism, heterosexism, and other forms of oppression that also deeply wound and dehumanize both selves and souls. In summary, although the book in some ways remains embedded in certain social, class, and clinical assumptions common in much pastoral psychotherapy practice today, it is a brave attempt to bring a serious theological understanding of evil into dialogue with the treatment of trauma. The authors have made an important effort to heal the split between the therapeutic and the prophetic in pastoral care and counseling. Trauma and Evil represents a useful resource for all those who take both trauma and evil seriously in our pastoral work today.","PeriodicalId":77221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pastoral care","volume":"55 1","pages":"456 - 458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/002234090105500420","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pastoral care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/002234090105500420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

tant section on grief. They sensitively represent the complex interplay between the reliving of past victimization and, through projection, the subtle potential for re-victimizing others. There is just one caution to be raised in this section pertaining to couples' therapy. The battered women's movement has long cautioned against couples' therapy where there is ongoing violence. Victims often cannot safely share deep experiences without risking retaliation. Therapists do need tools to address intense, chaotic couples' dynamics. At the same time, the authors' depth-oriented couples' method needs stronger safeguards against recurrence of violence, together with a more adequate analysis of power in intimate relationships, and how patriarchal privilege continues to reinforce violence against women. In Part III in general, "evil" rather fades from the picture, and the focus shifts mainly to clinical treatment of trauma. Parts II and III might both be strengthened by a more thorough integration of the clinical theory with explicitly religious language about God, sin, and theodicy (the authors' starting point in Part I). Part IV, then, which calls for a prophetic stance, represents a welcome return of theological language. For this reader, this was the most exciting and integrative section of the book. The authors argue against a splitting of prophetic response from pastoral care, and frame pastoral counseling itself as a form of cultural critique. They argue for an end in teaching and practice to a view of pastoral care and counseling as standing in opposition to social and political critique, and call for an integration of the two into a creative, holistic response to evil in all its guises. The strength of the book, its groundedness in clients' own experiences of evil and trauma, also in one way became its main weakness. In pastoral counseling, as in the counseling field in general, the vast majority of both counselors and clients are middle-class and white. Available forms of counseling have tended, in turn, to be captivated by medical and managed care models that have embedded racial and class privilege and cultural assumptions. By drawing on their own clinical experience with abuse survivors, the authors' account of evil and trauma stays experiencenear to their own clients' stories, but there is no explicit mention of race, class, sexual orientation, or social oppression. The authors' discussion of evil in Part I actually offered, without naming racism as such, a compelling description of the damages inflicted not only by sexual abuse but by racism and other systemic evils. Because the book is not intended solely as a book on sexual or domestic violence, it would have been enriched by more multi-cultural case examples (perhaps drawing from other practitioners working in different contexts), and by explicit references, both theoretical and case-related, to the racism, classism, heterosexism, and other forms of oppression that also deeply wound and dehumanize both selves and souls. In summary, although the book in some ways remains embedded in certain social, class, and clinical assumptions common in much pastoral psychotherapy practice today, it is a brave attempt to bring a serious theological understanding of evil into dialogue with the treatment of trauma. The authors have made an important effort to heal the split between the therapeutic and the prophetic in pastoral care and counseling. Trauma and Evil represents a useful resource for all those who take both trauma and evil seriously in our pastoral work today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:危机中的青少年
关于悲伤的部分。它们敏感地反映了过去受害经历的重现和通过投射再次使他人受害的微妙可能性之间复杂的相互作用。在这一节中,只有一个关于夫妻治疗的警告需要提出。长期以来,受虐妇女运动一直告诫人们不要对持续存在暴力的夫妻进行治疗。受害者往往无法在不冒报复风险的情况下安全地分享深刻的经历。治疗师确实需要工具来解决紧张、混乱的夫妻关系。与此同时,作者的深度导向夫妻方法需要更强有力的保护措施来防止暴力的再次发生,同时需要更充分地分析亲密关系中的权力,以及父权特权如何继续加强对女性的暴力。总的来说,在第三部分中,“邪恶”从画面中消失了,重点主要转移到创伤的临床治疗上。第二部分和第三部分可能会通过将临床理论与明确的关于上帝、罪和神正论的宗教语言(作者在第一部分的出发点)更彻底地整合而得到加强。然后,第四部分要求先知的立场,代表了神学语言的欢迎回归。对于这个读者来说,这是本书最令人兴奋和最全面的部分。作者反对将先知回应与教牧关怀分开,并将教牧咨询本身作为一种文化批判的形式。他们主张结束教牧关怀和咨询的教学和实践,以反对社会和政治批评,并呼吁将两者结合起来,以创造性的、全面的方式应对各种形式的邪恶。这本书的力量,它基于客户自己的邪恶和创伤的经历,也在某种程度上成为它的主要弱点。在教牧咨询中,就像在整个咨询领域一样,绝大多数咨询师和客户都是中产阶级和白人。反过来,现有的咨询形式往往会被嵌入种族、阶级特权和文化假设的医疗和管理护理模式所吸引。通过借鉴他们自己对虐待幸存者的临床经验,作者对邪恶和创伤的描述与他们自己客户的故事保持一致,但没有明确提到种族、阶级、性取向或社会压迫。作者在第一部分中对邪恶的讨论实际上提供了一种令人信服的描述,这种描述不仅是由性虐待造成的,而且是由种族主义和其他系统性邪恶造成的。因为这本书不仅仅是一本关于性暴力或家庭暴力的书,它会被更多的多元文化案例所丰富(可能来自其他在不同背景下工作的从业者),并通过明确的参考,无论是理论的还是与案例相关的,种族主义,阶级主义,异性恋主义,以及其他形式的压迫,这些压迫也深深地伤害和非人化了自我和灵魂。总而言之,尽管这本书在某些方面仍然植根于某些社会、阶级和临床假设,这些假设在今天的牧师心理治疗实践中很常见,但它是一次勇敢的尝试,将对邪恶的严肃神学理解与创伤治疗进行了对话。作者为弥合教牧关怀和辅导中治疗性和预言性的分裂作出了重要的努力。《创伤与罪恶》是一本有用的资料,供那些在我们今天的牧灵工作中认真对待创伤与罪恶的人参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The anti-pastoral tradition Constructions of Arcadia Georgic literature Four kinds of pastoral Post-pastoral
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1