Coefficients for Tests from a Decision Theoretic Point of View

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL Applied Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 1977-06-01 DOI:10.1177/014662167800200112
Wim J. van der Linden, G. J. Mellenbergh
{"title":"Coefficients for Tests from a Decision Theoretic Point of View","authors":"Wim J. van der Linden, G. J. Mellenbergh","doi":"10.1177/014662167800200112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From a decision theoretic point of view a general coefficient for tests, d, is derived. The coefficient is applied to three kinds of decision situations. First, the situation is considered in which a true score is estimated by a function of the observed score of a subject on a test (point estimation). Using the squared error loss function and Kelley's formula for estimating the true score, it is shown that d equals the reliability coefficient from classical test theory. Second, the situation is considered in which the ob served scores are split into more than two cate gories and different decisions are made for the categories (multiple decision). The general form of the coefficient is derived, and two loss functions suited to multiple decision situations are described. It is shown that for the loss function specifying con stant losses for the various combinations of cate gories on the true and on the observed scores, the coefficient can be computed under the assumptions of the beta-binomial model. Third, the situation is considered in which the observed scores are split into only two categories and different decisions are made for each category (dichotomous decisions). Using a loss function that specifies constant losses for combinations of categories on the true and ob served score and the assumption of an increasing regression function of t on x, it is shown that coeffi cient d equals Loevinger's coefficient H between true and observed scores. The coefficient can be com puted under the assumption of the beta-binomial model. Finally, it is shown that for a linear loss function and Kelley's formula for the regression of the true score on the observed score, the coefficient equals the reliability coefficient of classical test theory.","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":"2 1","pages":"119 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"1977-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/014662167800200112","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167800200112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

From a decision theoretic point of view a general coefficient for tests, d, is derived. The coefficient is applied to three kinds of decision situations. First, the situation is considered in which a true score is estimated by a function of the observed score of a subject on a test (point estimation). Using the squared error loss function and Kelley's formula for estimating the true score, it is shown that d equals the reliability coefficient from classical test theory. Second, the situation is considered in which the ob served scores are split into more than two cate gories and different decisions are made for the categories (multiple decision). The general form of the coefficient is derived, and two loss functions suited to multiple decision situations are described. It is shown that for the loss function specifying con stant losses for the various combinations of cate gories on the true and on the observed scores, the coefficient can be computed under the assumptions of the beta-binomial model. Third, the situation is considered in which the observed scores are split into only two categories and different decisions are made for each category (dichotomous decisions). Using a loss function that specifies constant losses for combinations of categories on the true and ob served score and the assumption of an increasing regression function of t on x, it is shown that coeffi cient d equals Loevinger's coefficient H between true and observed scores. The coefficient can be com puted under the assumption of the beta-binomial model. Finally, it is shown that for a linear loss function and Kelley's formula for the regression of the true score on the observed score, the coefficient equals the reliability coefficient of classical test theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从决策理论的角度看测试系数
从决策理论的观点出发,导出了测试的一般系数d。该系数应用于三种决策情况。首先,考虑的情况是,一个真实的分数是由一个测试中观察到的分数的函数估计的(点估计)。利用误差平方损失函数和Kelley公式估计真实分数,证明了d等于经典测试理论的信度系数。其次,考虑将观察到的分数分为两个以上类别,并对这些类别做出不同的决策(多重决策)的情况。导出了系数的一般形式,并描述了两个适合于多决策情况的损失函数。结果表明,对于各种类别组合在真值和观测值上的恒定损失的损失函数,可以在β -二项模型的假设下计算其系数。第三,考虑将观察到的分数分为两个类别,并对每个类别做出不同的决策(二分类决策)的情况。使用一个损失函数来指定类别组合在真实分数和观察分数上的恒定损失,并假设t在x上的递增回归函数,可以看出,真实分数和观察分数之间的系数d等于Loevinger系数H。该系数可以在-二项模型的假设下计算。最后,证明了对于一个线性损失函数和Kelley公式的真实分数对观测分数的回归,其系数等于经典测试理论的信度系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Rise of the Machine: Detecting Aberrant Response Patterns in Survey Instruments Using Autoencoder. The Impact of Latent Density Misspecification on Item Response Theory Equating Methods. Score-Based Tests With Fixed Effects Person Parameters in Item Response Theory: Detecting Model Misspecification Including Differential Item Functioning. Optimal Item Calibration in the Context of the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test. Influence of Uninformative Prior Distributions for MCMC Method on Estimating Variance Components in Generalizability Theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1