Age and Gender Differences in the Value of Productive Activities

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Research on Aging Pub Date : 1992-06-01 DOI:10.1177/0164027592142002
A. Herzog, J. Morgan
{"title":"Age and Gender Differences in the Value of Productive Activities","authors":"A. Herzog, J. Morgan","doi":"10.1177/0164027592142002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The definition of personal productivity based on paid work is expanded to include many forms of unpaid work. The productivity of these forms of unpaid work is estimated empirically, using several economic approaches (an opportunity cost approach, a market price approach, and a value-added approach) and one noneconomic approach. Additionally, two methods of dealing with selection bias when estimating opportunity costs for nonemployed persons are compared. These different approaches all document the extent to which many of the activities (such as housework, formal volunteer work, or informal help to relatives and friends) that are often performed without pay by older Americans or women are actually productive because they produce goods and services to which a market value can be imputed. Using this expanded definition to describe the productive contribution of men and women at different ages provides a much needed correction to existing social statistics: Women contribute in major ways to U.S. productivity, as do older adults, although to a lesser degree. These findings challenge the stereotypic view of older Americans as unproductive and mere burdens on society. Data were from a 1986 cross-sectional survey of 3,617 adults representative of those 25 years old and older living in the coterminous United States.","PeriodicalId":47983,"journal":{"name":"Research on Aging","volume":"14 1","pages":"169 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0164027592142002","citationCount":"67","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Aging","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027592142002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

Abstract

The definition of personal productivity based on paid work is expanded to include many forms of unpaid work. The productivity of these forms of unpaid work is estimated empirically, using several economic approaches (an opportunity cost approach, a market price approach, and a value-added approach) and one noneconomic approach. Additionally, two methods of dealing with selection bias when estimating opportunity costs for nonemployed persons are compared. These different approaches all document the extent to which many of the activities (such as housework, formal volunteer work, or informal help to relatives and friends) that are often performed without pay by older Americans or women are actually productive because they produce goods and services to which a market value can be imputed. Using this expanded definition to describe the productive contribution of men and women at different ages provides a much needed correction to existing social statistics: Women contribute in major ways to U.S. productivity, as do older adults, although to a lesser degree. These findings challenge the stereotypic view of older Americans as unproductive and mere burdens on society. Data were from a 1986 cross-sectional survey of 3,617 adults representative of those 25 years old and older living in the coterminous United States.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生产活动价值的年龄和性别差异
以有偿工作为基础的个人生产力的定义扩大到包括许多形式的无偿工作。使用几种经济方法(机会成本方法、市场价格方法和增值方法)和一种非经济方法,对这些形式的无偿工作的生产率进行了经验估计。此外,在估计非就业人员的机会成本时,比较了两种处理选择偏差的方法。这些不同的方法都证明,美国老年人或妇女经常无偿从事的许多活动(如家务劳动、正式的志愿工作或对亲友的非正式帮助)实际上在多大程度上是有生产力的,因为它们生产的商品和服务可以计算出市场价值。使用这一扩展的定义来描述不同年龄的男性和女性的生产贡献,为现有的社会统计提供了急需的纠正:女性对美国生产力的贡献主要方式,老年人也是如此,尽管程度较低。这些发现挑战了认为美国老年人没有生产力、只是社会负担的刻板印象。数据来自1986年对3617名成年人的横断面调查,这些成年人年龄在25岁及以上,居住在美国附近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research on Aging
Research on Aging GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Research on Aging is an interdisciplinary journal designed to reflect the expanding role of research in the field of social gerontology. Research on Aging exists to provide for publication of research in the broad range of disciplines concerned with aging. Scholars from the disciplines of sociology, geriatrics, history, psychology, anthropology, public health, economics, political science, criminal justice, and social work are encouraged to contribute articles to the journal. Emphasis will be on materials of broad scope and cross-disciplinary interest. Assessment of the current state of knowledge is as important as provision of an outlet for new knowledge, so critical and review articles are welcomed. Systematic attention to particular topics will also be featured.
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of Family Exchanges: How Life Course Transfers Influence Support From Adult Children. Offspring Education and Parents' COVID-19 Vaccination. The Change is Personal: Perceptions of Neighborhood Decline Among African American Women Aging in Place. Spousal Caregiving Types and Cognitive Trajectories Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China. Linking Multi-Dimensional Religiosity in Childhood and Later Adulthood: Implications for Later Life Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1