Term and Preterm Infants.

4区 医学 Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics Pub Date : 2016-02-23 DOI:10.1159/000452186
D. Turck, J. V. van Goudoever
{"title":"Term and Preterm Infants.","authors":"D. Turck, J. V. van Goudoever","doi":"10.1159/000452186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health professionals involved in child care are convinced nowadays that nutrition in early life (the general concept of the so-called 1,000 days) is of paramount importance not only on growth patterns and development in infancy, but also on many health outcomes later in life. In the present chapter we focus on 19 articles related to nutrition in preterm and term infants. Premature babies are at high risk of inadequate nutritional intake, and emphasis is placed on amino acid and lipid regimen in parenteral nutrition, the relationship between energy intake and risk for retinopathy, vitamin D intake and metabolism, donor breast milk and severe infections and mortality, lipid absorption and use of recombinant bile salt-stimulated lipase, DHA supplementation, and visual function and eating difficulties in early childhood. Term infants, i.e., approximately 90% of the population of newborns in industrialized countries, were not left out. During the last year, very interesting data were published on highly controversial topics, such as the use of hypoallergenic formulae in non-breastfed infants at risk for allergy (25-30% of all newborns), the long-term safety of soy-based infant formulae, protein intake and risk for overweight and obesity, and gluten introduction and the risk of celiac disease. There have also been comments on the use of fermented milks without live bacteria and the influence of antibiotic exposure on weight gain. In contrast to the large literature on breast and formula feeding, relatively little attention has been paid to the complementary feeding period, the nature of the foods given, or whether this period of significant dietary change influences later health and development. We selected 2 papers on the nutritional consequences of an increasingly popular feeding technique amongst parents, i.e., baby-led weaning, and on follow-up data up to the age of 6 years on vegetable acceptance during early introduction of complementary foods. As usual, more research is needed. Setting up clinical studies in the field of pediatric nutrition is difficult but indispensable. We cannot use any more observational studies and clinical experience to build up evidence-based guidelines. More randomized clinical studies and prospective population-based cohort studies are obviously needed. We hope that our comments will give the readers more \"appetite'' to look for more manuscripts in the field of infant nutrition and more information to prescribe the best nutritional support available for infants during the first months of life","PeriodicalId":54311,"journal":{"name":"World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"116 1","pages":"52-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000452186","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000452186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Health professionals involved in child care are convinced nowadays that nutrition in early life (the general concept of the so-called 1,000 days) is of paramount importance not only on growth patterns and development in infancy, but also on many health outcomes later in life. In the present chapter we focus on 19 articles related to nutrition in preterm and term infants. Premature babies are at high risk of inadequate nutritional intake, and emphasis is placed on amino acid and lipid regimen in parenteral nutrition, the relationship between energy intake and risk for retinopathy, vitamin D intake and metabolism, donor breast milk and severe infections and mortality, lipid absorption and use of recombinant bile salt-stimulated lipase, DHA supplementation, and visual function and eating difficulties in early childhood. Term infants, i.e., approximately 90% of the population of newborns in industrialized countries, were not left out. During the last year, very interesting data were published on highly controversial topics, such as the use of hypoallergenic formulae in non-breastfed infants at risk for allergy (25-30% of all newborns), the long-term safety of soy-based infant formulae, protein intake and risk for overweight and obesity, and gluten introduction and the risk of celiac disease. There have also been comments on the use of fermented milks without live bacteria and the influence of antibiotic exposure on weight gain. In contrast to the large literature on breast and formula feeding, relatively little attention has been paid to the complementary feeding period, the nature of the foods given, or whether this period of significant dietary change influences later health and development. We selected 2 papers on the nutritional consequences of an increasingly popular feeding technique amongst parents, i.e., baby-led weaning, and on follow-up data up to the age of 6 years on vegetable acceptance during early introduction of complementary foods. As usual, more research is needed. Setting up clinical studies in the field of pediatric nutrition is difficult but indispensable. We cannot use any more observational studies and clinical experience to build up evidence-based guidelines. More randomized clinical studies and prospective population-based cohort studies are obviously needed. We hope that our comments will give the readers more "appetite'' to look for more manuscripts in the field of infant nutrition and more information to prescribe the best nutritional support available for infants during the first months of life
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
足月和早产儿。
参与儿童保育的保健专业人员现在确信,生命早期(所谓1,000天的一般概念)的营养不仅对婴儿的生长模式和发育至关重要,而且对以后生活中的许多健康结果也至关重要。在本章中,我们将重点放在19篇有关早产儿和足月婴儿营养的文章上。早产儿是营养摄入不足的高危人群,重点关注肠外营养中的氨基酸和脂质方案、能量摄入与视网膜病变风险的关系、维生素D摄入与代谢、供体母乳与严重感染和死亡的关系、脂质吸收与重组胆汁盐刺激脂肪酶的使用、DHA补充、幼儿期视觉功能和进食困难。足月婴儿,即工业化国家约90%的新生儿,没有被排除在外。去年,发表了一些非常有趣的数据,涉及一些极具争议性的话题,比如在有过敏风险的非母乳喂养婴儿中使用低过敏性配方奶粉(占所有新生儿的25-30%),大豆配方奶粉的长期安全性,蛋白质摄入和超重和肥胖的风险,以及麸质引入和乳糜泻的风险。也有人评论说,使用没有活菌的发酵牛奶,以及接触抗生素对体重增加的影响。与大量关于母乳喂养和配方奶喂养的文献相比,很少有人关注补充喂养期、所给予食物的性质,或者这一时期的重大饮食变化是否会影响后来的健康和发育。我们选择了两篇关于父母之间日益流行的喂养技术的营养后果的论文,即婴儿主导的断奶,以及在早期引入辅食期间对6岁蔬菜接受程度的随访数据。像往常一样,还需要更多的研究。在儿科营养领域开展临床研究是困难的,但也是必不可少的。我们不能再使用任何观察性研究和临床经验来建立基于证据的指导方针。显然需要更多的随机临床研究和前瞻性人群队列研究。我们希望我们的评论能给读者更多的“胃口”去寻找更多关于婴儿营养领域的手稿,并提供更多的信息来规定婴儿在生命最初几个月的最佳营养支持
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics
World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Volumes in this series consist of exceptionally thorough reviews on topics selected as either fundamental to improved understanding of human and animal nutrition, useful in resolving present controversies, or relevant to problems of social and preventive medicine that depend for their solution on progress in nutrition. Many of the individual articles have been judged as among the most comprehensive reviews ever published on the given topic. Since the first volume appeared in 1959, the series has earned repeated praise for the quality of its scholarship and the reputation of its authors.
期刊最新文献
Atención nutricional de lactantes prematuros Nutrition and Growth Pediatric Nutrition in Practice 1.3.4 Digestible and Non-Digestible Carbohydrates. 2.1 Breastfeeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1