Physical scaling of water mist protection for ignitable liquid cut-off rooms:

Hong Yu
{"title":"Physical scaling of water mist protection for ignitable liquid cut-off rooms:","authors":"Hong Yu","doi":"10.1177/1042391513490298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the Froude-modeling scaling approach, water mist protection for a 7.47 × 7.47 × 7.47-m cut-off room where ignitable liquids are used was projected from the previously determined extinguishing requirement for heptane pool fires in a ½-scale enclosure and then verified with full-scale testing. The full-scale building occupancy was required to accommodate cut-off room door openings ranging from 1.86 × 3.73 m high up to 3.73 × 3.73 m. The fire challenge was a heptane spill fire cascading from the top of a 1.83-m dia. by 2.74-m high steel tank at a spill rate of 37.9 L/min. Two off-the-shelf nozzles were selected as candidates for the full-scale building to approximate the scaled-up water mist spray requirement. At a discharge pressure of 90 bar, one nozzle discharged 28 L/min, with a spray angle of 100° and a volume-median droplet dia. of 115 µm; the other discharged 24.4 L/min, with a 180° spray angle and median dia. of 96 µm. Nine nozzles were arranged at the ceiling level in a 3 × 3 matrix with a spacing of 1.86 × 1.86 m. Before the two candidate protection schemes were challenged with the spill fire, scaled-up heptane pool fires were used to ensure that the fire extinguishing propensity was consistent with that observed in the ½-scale enclosure. The pool fire tests showed that the nozzle with the smaller spray angle provided better fire extinguishing performance, which was later confirmed in the spill fire tests. The protection scheme with the smaller spray angle could extinguish the spill fire for door openings up to 3.05 × 3.05 m. For larger openings, two additional downward water mist sprays were required in the door opening to expedite fire extinguishment by reducing ventilation through the door opening. Water mist protection could provide adequate cooling to fuel tanks as long as such protection could extinguish the fire. Overall, the investigation demonstrated that physical scaling is a useful tool to provide an engineering estimate of water mist protection requirements. Language: en","PeriodicalId":50192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fire Protection Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"157-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1042391513490298","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fire Protection Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1042391513490298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Based on the Froude-modeling scaling approach, water mist protection for a 7.47 × 7.47 × 7.47-m cut-off room where ignitable liquids are used was projected from the previously determined extinguishing requirement for heptane pool fires in a ½-scale enclosure and then verified with full-scale testing. The full-scale building occupancy was required to accommodate cut-off room door openings ranging from 1.86 × 3.73 m high up to 3.73 × 3.73 m. The fire challenge was a heptane spill fire cascading from the top of a 1.83-m dia. by 2.74-m high steel tank at a spill rate of 37.9 L/min. Two off-the-shelf nozzles were selected as candidates for the full-scale building to approximate the scaled-up water mist spray requirement. At a discharge pressure of 90 bar, one nozzle discharged 28 L/min, with a spray angle of 100° and a volume-median droplet dia. of 115 µm; the other discharged 24.4 L/min, with a 180° spray angle and median dia. of 96 µm. Nine nozzles were arranged at the ceiling level in a 3 × 3 matrix with a spacing of 1.86 × 1.86 m. Before the two candidate protection schemes were challenged with the spill fire, scaled-up heptane pool fires were used to ensure that the fire extinguishing propensity was consistent with that observed in the ½-scale enclosure. The pool fire tests showed that the nozzle with the smaller spray angle provided better fire extinguishing performance, which was later confirmed in the spill fire tests. The protection scheme with the smaller spray angle could extinguish the spill fire for door openings up to 3.05 × 3.05 m. For larger openings, two additional downward water mist sprays were required in the door opening to expedite fire extinguishment by reducing ventilation through the door opening. Water mist protection could provide adequate cooling to fuel tanks as long as such protection could extinguish the fire. Overall, the investigation demonstrated that physical scaling is a useful tool to provide an engineering estimate of water mist protection requirements. Language: en
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可燃液体切断室水雾防护的物理结垢
基于froude模型缩放方法,根据先前确定的在1 / 2比例的封闭环境中对正烷池火灾的灭火要求,对使用可燃性液体的7.47 × 7.47 × 7.47 m封闭房间的水雾保护进行了预测,然后通过全尺寸测试进行了验证。全尺寸的建筑占用需要容纳从1.86 × 3.73米高到3.73 × 3.73米高的截止房间门。火灾挑战是从1.83米直径的顶部倾泻而下的庚烷溢出火灾。以37.9升/分钟的溢出速率,通过2.74米高的钢罐。两个现成的喷嘴被选为全尺寸建筑的候选者,以接近按比例放大的水雾喷雾要求。在排出压力为90 bar时,一个喷嘴排出量为28l /min,喷射角为100°,液滴直径为体积中值。115µm;另一种为24.4 L/min,喷角180°,中值直径。96µm。9个喷嘴以3 × 3的矩阵布置在顶棚水平,间距为1.86 × 1.86 m。在两种候选保护方案受到泄漏火灾的挑战之前,使用了按比例扩大的庚烷池火灾,以确保灭火倾向与在1 / 2比例外壳中观察到的灭火倾向一致。池火试验结果表明,喷雾角越小的喷头灭火性能越好,随后的溢火试验也证实了这一点。较小喷角防护方案可扑灭3.05 × 3.05 m范围内的门口溢火。对于较大的开口,需要在门开口处增加两个向下的水雾喷雾,通过减少通过门开口的通风来加速灭火。水雾保护可以为燃料箱提供足够的冷却,只要这种保护可以扑灭火灾。总的来说,调查表明,物理标度是提供水雾保护要求的工程估计的有用工具。语言:在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fire Protection Engineering
Journal of Fire Protection Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:综合
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Underground Fire Mains Other Detection and Alarm Devices Hydraulic Calculations of Sprinkler Systems Dry-Agent Automatic Suppression Systems Unwanted Fire and Fire Growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1