‘Good Governance’ and Poverty Alleviation Programmes

H. S. Shylendra, Kishore Bhirdikar
{"title":"‘Good Governance’ and Poverty Alleviation Programmes","authors":"H. S. Shylendra, Kishore Bhirdikar","doi":"10.1177/097306800500100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to examine the flagship poverty alleviation scheme Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) against the background of emerging policies aimed at ‘good governance’. How far the SGSY, a major programme of the Government of India for poverty alleviation has been able to incorporate ‘good governance’ principles like participation of the people, involvement of civil society, and sound project formulation, is the main focus of this article. The governance approach indicated in the SGSY is supposed to be significantly different from earlier poverty alleviation programmes in India, especially the Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP). However, the article, based on a review of some available studies, indicates that the SGSY is implemented in a very deterministic and top-down manner, ignoring the participatory approach that is envisaged in the design. In the whole process, right from identification of participants to supporting them, to developing a sustainable income generation enterprise, the SGSY is beset with problems like faulty selection, improper identification of viable schemes, sidelining of capacity building and, above all, lack of integration among different agencies involved in implementation of the scheme. The article concludes that ‘good governance’ for poverty alleviation programmes seems to be more of rhetoric than a reality.","PeriodicalId":39177,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rural Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"203 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/097306800500100204","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rural Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/097306800500100204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

This article attempts to examine the flagship poverty alleviation scheme Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) against the background of emerging policies aimed at ‘good governance’. How far the SGSY, a major programme of the Government of India for poverty alleviation has been able to incorporate ‘good governance’ principles like participation of the people, involvement of civil society, and sound project formulation, is the main focus of this article. The governance approach indicated in the SGSY is supposed to be significantly different from earlier poverty alleviation programmes in India, especially the Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP). However, the article, based on a review of some available studies, indicates that the SGSY is implemented in a very deterministic and top-down manner, ignoring the participatory approach that is envisaged in the design. In the whole process, right from identification of participants to supporting them, to developing a sustainable income generation enterprise, the SGSY is beset with problems like faulty selection, improper identification of viable schemes, sidelining of capacity building and, above all, lack of integration among different agencies involved in implementation of the scheme. The article concludes that ‘good governance’ for poverty alleviation programmes seems to be more of rhetoric than a reality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“善治”和扶贫计划
本文试图在旨在“善治”的新兴政策背景下审视旗舰扶贫计划Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY)。印度政府的一个主要扶贫项目SGSY在多大程度上能够将“善治”原则纳入其中,如人民的参与、公民社会的参与和合理的项目制定,这是本文的主要焦点。SGSY中指出的治理方法应该与印度早期的扶贫方案,特别是农村综合发展方案(IRDP)有很大不同。然而,本文基于对一些现有研究的回顾,指出SGSY是以一种非常确定和自上而下的方式实现的,忽略了设计中设想的参与性方法。在整个过程中,从确定参与者到支持他们,再到发展可持续的创收企业,SGSY面临着选择错误、对可行方案识别不当、能力建设边缘化等问题,最重要的是,参与计划实施的不同机构之间缺乏整合。这篇文章的结论是,扶贫项目的“善治”似乎更多的是一种修辞而不是现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Rural Management
International Journal of Rural Management Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Understanding Role of Digital Asset and LOSI 
for Rural Areas: An Evidence-based Study in Indian Context Economy as a Social Institution in the Tribal Society: A Scale to 
Measure the Perceived 
Role Performance of Economic Institutions Fulfilling Domestic Water Demand in Semiarid Regions of North Karnataka: Challenges and Way Forward Sustaining Livelihoods in Protected Areas: Lessons from State-initiated Projects in Mt. 
Hamiguitan Range 
Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern Philippines Effectiveness of FPOs: Credit Performance Evaluation of Farmer Producer Companies in Tamil Nadu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1