Evaluation of a continuous quality improvement program in anticoagulant therapy

IF 1.6 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Canadian Pharmacists Journal Pub Date : 2016-10-06 DOI:10.1177/1715163516671334
Ariane Cantin, Alexandre Lahaie, Bojan Odobasic, Marie-Philip Tremblay, Dana Wazzan, Stéphanie Caron, C. Leblanc, J. Martineau, L. Lalonde
{"title":"Evaluation of a continuous quality improvement program in anticoagulant therapy","authors":"Ariane Cantin, Alexandre Lahaie, Bojan Odobasic, Marie-Philip Tremblay, Dana Wazzan, Stéphanie Caron, C. Leblanc, J. Martineau, L. Lalonde","doi":"10.1177/1715163516671334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The ACO Program (Programme ACO), a continuous quality improvement program (CQIP) in anticoagulation therapy, was offered in community pharmacies as a pilot project. Objective: To evaluate the participants’ appreciation for the various activities of the program. Methods: Participants had access to training activities, including an audit with feedback, online training activities (OTA), clinical tools and support from facilitators. Cognitive behavioural learning determinants were evaluated before and 5 months after the beginning of the program. Participants’ satisfaction and perception were documented via online questionnaires and a semistructured interview. Results: Of the 52 pharmacists in the ACO Program, 47 participated in this evaluation. Seventy-seven percent of the participants completed at least 1 OTA and 6% published on the forum. The feeling of personal effectiveness rose from 8.01 (7.67-8.35) to 8.62 (8.24-8.99). The audit and feedback, as well as the high-quality OTA and their lecturers, were the most appreciated elements. Discussion: There was a high OTA participation rate. The facilitators seemed to play a key role in the CQIP. The low level of participation in the forum reflects the known phenomenon of social loafing. Technical difficulties affecting the platform and data collection for the audit with feedback constituted limitations. Conclusion: The CQIP in anticoagulation therapy is appreciated by community pharmacists and is associated with an improved feeling of personal effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":46612,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal","volume":"149 1","pages":"352 - 361"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1715163516671334","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1715163516671334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The ACO Program (Programme ACO), a continuous quality improvement program (CQIP) in anticoagulation therapy, was offered in community pharmacies as a pilot project. Objective: To evaluate the participants’ appreciation for the various activities of the program. Methods: Participants had access to training activities, including an audit with feedback, online training activities (OTA), clinical tools and support from facilitators. Cognitive behavioural learning determinants were evaluated before and 5 months after the beginning of the program. Participants’ satisfaction and perception were documented via online questionnaires and a semistructured interview. Results: Of the 52 pharmacists in the ACO Program, 47 participated in this evaluation. Seventy-seven percent of the participants completed at least 1 OTA and 6% published on the forum. The feeling of personal effectiveness rose from 8.01 (7.67-8.35) to 8.62 (8.24-8.99). The audit and feedback, as well as the high-quality OTA and their lecturers, were the most appreciated elements. Discussion: There was a high OTA participation rate. The facilitators seemed to play a key role in the CQIP. The low level of participation in the forum reflects the known phenomenon of social loafing. Technical difficulties affecting the platform and data collection for the audit with feedback constituted limitations. Conclusion: The CQIP in anticoagulation therapy is appreciated by community pharmacists and is associated with an improved feeling of personal effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗凝治疗持续质量改进方案的评价
背景:在社区药房开展了抗凝治疗持续质量改进项目(CQIP)。目的:评估参与者对项目各项活动的欣赏程度。方法:参与者可以参加培训活动,包括有反馈的审核、在线培训活动(OTA)、临床工具和辅导员的支持。认知行为学习决定因素在项目开始前和5个月后进行评估。参与者的满意度和感知是通过在线问卷和半结构化访谈记录的。结果:在ACO项目的52名药师中,有47名参加了本次评估。77%的参与者至少完成了一次OTA, 6%的参与者在论坛上发表了文章。个人效能感由8.01(7.67-8.35)上升至8.62(8.24-8.99)。审计和反馈,以及高质量的在线旅行社和他们的讲师,是最受欢迎的因素。讨论:OTA的参与率很高。促进者似乎在CQIP中发挥了关键作用。参与论坛的低水平反映了众所周知的社会惰化现象。影响平台的技术困难和反馈审计的数据收集构成了限制。结论:CQIP在抗凝治疗中得到了社区药师的认可,并与个人效能感的提高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Pharmacists Journal
Canadian Pharmacists Journal PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
26.70%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Established in 1868, the Canadian Pharmacists Journal is the oldest continuously published periodical in Canada. Our mission is to enhance patient care through advancement of pharmacy practice, with continuing professional development, peer-reviewed research, and advocacy. Our vision is to become the foremost journal for pharmacy practice and research.
期刊最新文献
The role of Alberta pharmacists working in opioid use disorder and their potential to prescribe buprenorphine-naloxone: A qualitative study. Opportunities and challenges associated with the launch of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) in British Columbia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study to explore community pharmacists' perspectives. Lyme disease chemoprophylaxis prescribing before and after pharmacist prescriptive authority in Nova Scotia. Enabling pharmacist prescribing: Lessons learned in Nova Scotia using behaviour change theory. British Columbia community pharmacy during COVID-19: Describing the patient experience via Google reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1