Checklists, global health and surgery: a five-year checkup of the WHO Surgical Safety checklist programme

Wrg Perry, E. Kelley
{"title":"Checklists, global health and surgery: a five-year checkup of the WHO Surgical Safety checklist programme","authors":"Wrg Perry, E. Kelley","doi":"10.1177/1356262214535734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has become a high-profile symbol for patient safety efforts in surgery. Since the landmark study by Haynes et al. 1 documenting its success at reducing peri-operative morbidity and mortality in a diversity of settings, others have gone on to show positive effects of the checklist on teamwork, communication, and patient outcomes. The widespread dissemination of the checklist has now allowed for a more global analysis of its role in surgery, and has highlighted two key points: first, the success of the checklist relies on effective and appropriate implementation; and second, the checklist needs to be introduced as part of a broader patient safety movement. Beyond universal challenges with implementation, some questions have been asked about its applicability to low- and middle-income countries. WHO acknowledges that checklist implementation in such settings needs to be well considered; limited availability of resources and less structure around patient safety provides a different context for effective use. Further research needs to be undertaken to better understand what if any modifications need to be made. WHO also hope to better coordinate patient safety efforts with the global surgery movement to maximize the effect of the checklist and improve surgical safety in low- and middle-income countries.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"20 1","pages":"59 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262214535734","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262214535734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has become a high-profile symbol for patient safety efforts in surgery. Since the landmark study by Haynes et al. 1 documenting its success at reducing peri-operative morbidity and mortality in a diversity of settings, others have gone on to show positive effects of the checklist on teamwork, communication, and patient outcomes. The widespread dissemination of the checklist has now allowed for a more global analysis of its role in surgery, and has highlighted two key points: first, the success of the checklist relies on effective and appropriate implementation; and second, the checklist needs to be introduced as part of a broader patient safety movement. Beyond universal challenges with implementation, some questions have been asked about its applicability to low- and middle-income countries. WHO acknowledges that checklist implementation in such settings needs to be well considered; limited availability of resources and less structure around patient safety provides a different context for effective use. Further research needs to be undertaken to better understand what if any modifications need to be made. WHO also hope to better coordinate patient safety efforts with the global surgery movement to maximize the effect of the checklist and improve surgical safety in low- and middle-income countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核对表、全球卫生和外科:世卫组织手术安全核对表规划的五年检查
世卫组织手术安全核对表已成为外科手术患者安全工作的高调标志。自Haynes等人的里程碑式研究1记录了其在多种情况下成功降低围手术期发病率和死亡率以来,其他人继续展示了核对表在团队合作、沟通和患者预后方面的积极作用。清单的广泛传播使得人们能够对其在外科手术中的作用进行更全面的分析,并强调了两个关键点:首先,清单的成功依赖于有效和适当的实施;第二,该清单需要作为更广泛的患者安全运动的一部分引入。除了执行方面的普遍挑战外,还对其对低收入和中等收入国家的适用性提出了一些问题。世卫组织承认,在这种情况下需要充分考虑清单的实施情况;有限的可用资源和较少的患者安全结构为有效使用提供了不同的环境。需要进行进一步的研究,以更好地了解是否需要进行任何修改。世卫组织还希望与全球手术运动更好地协调患者安全工作,以最大限度地发挥清单的作用,并改善低收入和中等收入国家的手术安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promoter methylation of matrix metallopeptidase 9 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: A novel biomarker in a promising source for noninvasive colorectal cancer diagnosis. Incident reporting and a culture of safety Battram v Dr Geoghegan Reconciliation of hospital discharge summaries and changes in patient medications Improving healthcare through the use of ‘medical manslaughter’? Facts, fears and the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1