First-year doctors’ attitudes and beliefs relating to quality improvement and patient safety

M. Dahill, R. Bethune, A. Carson-Stevens, Eleanor Soo, K. Finucane, Joanne Watson, T. Woodhead, Clare VanHamel
{"title":"First-year doctors’ attitudes and beliefs relating to quality improvement and patient safety","authors":"M. Dahill, R. Bethune, A. Carson-Stevens, Eleanor Soo, K. Finucane, Joanne Watson, T. Woodhead, Clare VanHamel","doi":"10.1177/1356262215585270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current environment of culture change and financial pressure on the National Health Service, quality improvement initiatives are heralded as new vehicles for workplace evolution. Foundation Year One doctors encounter many of the problems impinging on quality, and their enthusiasm and number make them an indispensable resource and critical mass for improvement. In response to the increasing importance of quality improvement training, and as part of an ongoing project to embed quality improvement education in the Severn Deanery region, this paper describes the evolution of a questionnaire tool to assess the attitudes and beliefs of a cohort of new Foundation Year One doctors. An electronic survey was developed and validated to address each aim of quality care. The survey was sent by email to every Foundation Year One doctor in the Severn Deanery. New Foundation Year One doctors’ attitudes are overwhelmingly positive towards quality improvement and patient safety; however, universally, they do not feel valued and listened to. In addition, they do not feel that their previous medical education has fully equipped them to improve the quality and safety of the care they deliver to their patients. Foundation Year One doctors represent a large, intelligent and enthusiastic workforce and in an environment where quality is now accepted as paramount, harnessing their potential through better quality improvement training could prove advantageous to all National Health Service stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"21 1","pages":"47 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262215585270","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262215585270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the current environment of culture change and financial pressure on the National Health Service, quality improvement initiatives are heralded as new vehicles for workplace evolution. Foundation Year One doctors encounter many of the problems impinging on quality, and their enthusiasm and number make them an indispensable resource and critical mass for improvement. In response to the increasing importance of quality improvement training, and as part of an ongoing project to embed quality improvement education in the Severn Deanery region, this paper describes the evolution of a questionnaire tool to assess the attitudes and beliefs of a cohort of new Foundation Year One doctors. An electronic survey was developed and validated to address each aim of quality care. The survey was sent by email to every Foundation Year One doctor in the Severn Deanery. New Foundation Year One doctors’ attitudes are overwhelmingly positive towards quality improvement and patient safety; however, universally, they do not feel valued and listened to. In addition, they do not feel that their previous medical education has fully equipped them to improve the quality and safety of the care they deliver to their patients. Foundation Year One doctors represent a large, intelligent and enthusiastic workforce and in an environment where quality is now accepted as paramount, harnessing their potential through better quality improvement training could prove advantageous to all National Health Service stakeholders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一年医生对质量改进和患者安全的态度和信念
在当前文化变革和国家卫生服务面临财政压力的环境下,质量改进倡议被视为工作场所变革的新手段。基础第一年的医生会遇到许多影响质量的问题,他们的热情和数量使他们成为改进的不可或缺的资源和关键群体。为了应对质量改进培训日益重要的问题,并作为正在进行的项目的一部分,将质量改进教育嵌入塞文迪纳里地区,本文描述了一种问卷调查工具的演变,该工具用于评估新一年级医生的态度和信念。开发并验证了一项电子调查,以解决优质护理的每个目标。该调查通过电子邮件发送给了塞文迪纳里的每一位预科一年级医生。新基础第一年的医生对质量改善和患者安全的态度非常积极;然而,普遍来说,他们没有感觉到被重视和被倾听。此外,他们认为他们以前的医学教育并没有使他们完全具备提高对病人护理质量和安全性的能力。基础一年级的医生代表了一个庞大的、聪明的、热情的工作队伍,在一个质量现在被认为是最重要的环境中,通过更好的质量改进培训来利用他们的潜力,可能对所有国家卫生服务的利益相关者都是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promoter methylation of matrix metallopeptidase 9 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: A novel biomarker in a promising source for noninvasive colorectal cancer diagnosis. Incident reporting and a culture of safety Battram v Dr Geoghegan Reconciliation of hospital discharge summaries and changes in patient medications Improving healthcare through the use of ‘medical manslaughter’? Facts, fears and the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1