What are the legal implications of ignoring hospital policies and procedures?

J. Whyman
{"title":"What are the legal implications of ignoring hospital policies and procedures?","authors":"J. Whyman","doi":"10.1177/1356262215604991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hospital policies and procedures are designed to help prevent patients being harmed during the course of their treatment. The same principles apply as they do in business: by implementing a process-driven approach to ensuring that every component of the product is manufactured to the highest possible specification, customer satisfaction and safety can be secured. The more safety conscious the business, such as aerospace engineering, the tighter the procedures and controls. Hospitals should be no different; they are dealing with life and death and, as such, straightforward, fully tested procedures that are put in place to eliminate medical negligence mistakes should not be ignored. So why, as medical negligence lawyers, do we still see failures by both hospitals and health professionals to follow well-established procedures resulting in serious harm to patients? And particularly when such failures can and do lead to legal sanctions resulting not only in the loss of reputation and livelihood but also, in extreme cases, to liberty? In this article, which is a personal view, I explore some of the reasons why some medical practitioners fail to follow procedures and policies and outline the sanctions, both civil and criminal, for that failure.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"21 1","pages":"83 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262215604991","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262215604991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Hospital policies and procedures are designed to help prevent patients being harmed during the course of their treatment. The same principles apply as they do in business: by implementing a process-driven approach to ensuring that every component of the product is manufactured to the highest possible specification, customer satisfaction and safety can be secured. The more safety conscious the business, such as aerospace engineering, the tighter the procedures and controls. Hospitals should be no different; they are dealing with life and death and, as such, straightforward, fully tested procedures that are put in place to eliminate medical negligence mistakes should not be ignored. So why, as medical negligence lawyers, do we still see failures by both hospitals and health professionals to follow well-established procedures resulting in serious harm to patients? And particularly when such failures can and do lead to legal sanctions resulting not only in the loss of reputation and livelihood but also, in extreme cases, to liberty? In this article, which is a personal view, I explore some of the reasons why some medical practitioners fail to follow procedures and policies and outline the sanctions, both civil and criminal, for that failure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
忽视医院政策和程序的法律含义是什么?
医院的政策和程序旨在帮助防止病人在治疗过程中受到伤害。同样的原则也适用于商业:通过实现流程驱动的方法来确保产品的每个组件都按照尽可能高的规格制造,可以确保客户满意度和安全性。企业(如航空航天工程)的安全意识越强,其程序和控制就越严格。医院也不应例外;他们正在处理生死攸关的问题,因此,为消除医疗疏忽错误而制定的直接、经过充分检验的程序不应被忽视。那么,作为医疗过失律师,为什么我们仍然看到医院和卫生专业人员未能遵循既定的程序,从而对患者造成严重伤害?特别是当这种失败可能而且确实会导致法律制裁,不仅导致名誉和生计的丧失,而且在极端情况下,还会导致自由?在这篇文章中(这是我的个人观点),我探讨了一些医生不遵守程序和政策的原因,并概述了对这种失败的民事和刑事制裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promoter methylation of matrix metallopeptidase 9 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: A novel biomarker in a promising source for noninvasive colorectal cancer diagnosis. Incident reporting and a culture of safety Battram v Dr Geoghegan Reconciliation of hospital discharge summaries and changes in patient medications Improving healthcare through the use of ‘medical manslaughter’? Facts, fears and the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1