Midwifery perspectives: The consent process in the context of patient safety and medico-legal issues

Angela M Cook
{"title":"Midwifery perspectives: The consent process in the context of patient safety and medico-legal issues","authors":"Angela M Cook","doi":"10.1177/1356262216672614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obtaining consent is a legal and ethical necessity prior to midwifery care provision. Furthermore, midwives must act in the best interests of women at all times and make sure that properly informed consent is obtained and documented prior to carrying out any action. Although the judgment made at the Supreme Court, in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, involved an obstetrician, the recommendations of this case will have far reaching implications for midwives within the consent process. Midwives will be required to consider informing women of any material risks involved in any recommended care and treatment, including how likely women are to attach significance to such risk. The risk discourse that pervades maternity care is well cited and midwives need to strive to achieve a safe, holistic, woman-centred approach to care whilst implementing the recommendations of Montgomery. Challenges exist for midwives in obtaining informed consent particularly resulting from sub-standard communication issues. This clearly impacts negatively upon patient safety issues. Ultimately, NICE advocate that pregnant women should be offered evidence based information and support to enable them to make informed decisions about their care and treatment. Montgomery provides the highest level of legal support for this position.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"22 1","pages":"25 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262216672614","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262216672614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Obtaining consent is a legal and ethical necessity prior to midwifery care provision. Furthermore, midwives must act in the best interests of women at all times and make sure that properly informed consent is obtained and documented prior to carrying out any action. Although the judgment made at the Supreme Court, in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, involved an obstetrician, the recommendations of this case will have far reaching implications for midwives within the consent process. Midwives will be required to consider informing women of any material risks involved in any recommended care and treatment, including how likely women are to attach significance to such risk. The risk discourse that pervades maternity care is well cited and midwives need to strive to achieve a safe, holistic, woman-centred approach to care whilst implementing the recommendations of Montgomery. Challenges exist for midwives in obtaining informed consent particularly resulting from sub-standard communication issues. This clearly impacts negatively upon patient safety issues. Ultimately, NICE advocate that pregnant women should be offered evidence based information and support to enable them to make informed decisions about their care and treatment. Montgomery provides the highest level of legal support for this position.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产观点:患者安全和医疗法律问题背景下的同意程序
在提供助产护理之前,获得同意是法律和道德上的必要条件。此外,助产士必须在任何时候都以妇女的最佳利益行事,并确保在采取任何行动之前获得适当的知情同意并记录在案。尽管在蒙哥马利诉拉纳克郡卫生委员会一案中,最高法院的判决涉及一名产科医生,但该案的建议将对同意程序中的助产士产生深远影响。助产士将被要求考虑告知妇女在任何推荐的护理和治疗中涉及的任何重大风险,包括妇女重视这种风险的可能性有多大。关于产科护理的风险论述被广泛引用,助产士需要努力实现安全、全面、以妇女为中心的护理方法,同时实施蒙哥马利的建议。助产士在获得知情同意方面存在挑战,特别是由于不标准的沟通问题。这显然会对患者安全问题产生负面影响。最终,NICE倡导孕妇应该提供基于证据的信息和支持,使她们能够对自己的护理和治疗做出明智的决定。蒙哥马利为这一立场提供了最高级别的法律支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promoter methylation of matrix metallopeptidase 9 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: A novel biomarker in a promising source for noninvasive colorectal cancer diagnosis. Incident reporting and a culture of safety Battram v Dr Geoghegan Reconciliation of hospital discharge summaries and changes in patient medications Improving healthcare through the use of ‘medical manslaughter’? Facts, fears and the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1