Post Brexit crystal ball gazing: What the future holds for Phase I Clinical Trials in the UK

G. Matthews, N. Williams
{"title":"Post Brexit crystal ball gazing: What the future holds for Phase I Clinical Trials in the UK","authors":"G. Matthews, N. Williams","doi":"10.1177/1356262217702814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EU Regulation 536/2014 (“Regulations”) is due to take practical effect across the Eurozone by the end of 2017 at the earliest and no later than October 2018 following the implementation of procedural requirements. It will replace the EU Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC. The Regulations are designed to reverse what regulators described as a downward trend in the conduct of clinical trials within Europe because of the “lengthy and cumbersome application process and the failure of the pre-existing regime to accommodate the global scope of clinical trials.” The purpose of the Regulations is to simplify and harmonise the administrative provisions governing clinical trials in the EU. With pleasing Pharmaceutical companies high on the political agenda, the pertinent question that arises is whether patient and public interests will be overlooked to cater to industry concerns? This article will outline the changes effected by the Regulation. It will evaluate the impact these changes will have on patient safety in the context of Phase I or First-in-human (FIH) trials by examining the TGN1412 clinical drug trial (also known as the Northwick Park drug trial). The second part of this article will discuss whether there is a place for the Regulations in the post Brexit landscape. The continuing uncertainty surrounding Brexit means that it remains difficult to come to any definitive conclusions but there are significant issues that require closer examination at this time.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"22 1","pages":"104 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262217702814","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262217702814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

EU Regulation 536/2014 (“Regulations”) is due to take practical effect across the Eurozone by the end of 2017 at the earliest and no later than October 2018 following the implementation of procedural requirements. It will replace the EU Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC. The Regulations are designed to reverse what regulators described as a downward trend in the conduct of clinical trials within Europe because of the “lengthy and cumbersome application process and the failure of the pre-existing regime to accommodate the global scope of clinical trials.” The purpose of the Regulations is to simplify and harmonise the administrative provisions governing clinical trials in the EU. With pleasing Pharmaceutical companies high on the political agenda, the pertinent question that arises is whether patient and public interests will be overlooked to cater to industry concerns? This article will outline the changes effected by the Regulation. It will evaluate the impact these changes will have on patient safety in the context of Phase I or First-in-human (FIH) trials by examining the TGN1412 clinical drug trial (also known as the Northwick Park drug trial). The second part of this article will discuss whether there is a place for the Regulations in the post Brexit landscape. The continuing uncertainty surrounding Brexit means that it remains difficult to come to any definitive conclusions but there are significant issues that require closer examination at this time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脱欧后的水晶球预测:英国I期临床试验的未来是什么
欧盟法规536/2014(“法规”)将在程序要求实施后,最早于2017年底在整个欧元区生效,最迟不迟于2018年10月。它将取代欧盟临床试验指令2001/20/EC。该条例旨在扭转监管机构所描述的在欧洲进行临床试验的下降趋势,因为“漫长而繁琐的申请过程以及现有制度未能适应全球临床试验范围”。该法规的目的是简化和协调管理欧盟临床试验的行政规定。取悦制药公司在政治议程上占据重要地位,随之而来的相关问题是,为了迎合制药行业的担忧,患者和公众的利益是否会被忽视?本文将概述该规例所带来的改变。它将通过检查TGN1412临床药物试验(也称为Northwick Park药物试验)来评估这些变化对I期或首次人体(FIH)试验背景下患者安全性的影响。本文的第二部分将讨论在英国脱欧后的环境中,这些规定是否有一席之地。围绕英国脱欧的持续不确定性意味着仍难以得出任何明确的结论,但目前仍有一些重大问题需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promoter methylation of matrix metallopeptidase 9 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: A novel biomarker in a promising source for noninvasive colorectal cancer diagnosis. Incident reporting and a culture of safety Battram v Dr Geoghegan Reconciliation of hospital discharge summaries and changes in patient medications Improving healthcare through the use of ‘medical manslaughter’? Facts, fears and the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1