Social-Cognitive Predictors of Readiness to Use Evidence-Based Practice

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin Pub Date : 2016-10-01 DOI:10.1177/0034355215591779
Joseph S. Pfaller, Wei-Mo Tu, Blaise Morrison, Fong Chan, Laura A. Owens, C. Anderson, Sandra Fitzgerald, Jessica M. Brooks, F. E. Menz
{"title":"Social-Cognitive Predictors of Readiness to Use Evidence-Based Practice","authors":"Joseph S. Pfaller, Wei-Mo Tu, Blaise Morrison, Fong Chan, Laura A. Owens, C. Anderson, Sandra Fitzgerald, Jessica M. Brooks, F. E. Menz","doi":"10.1177/0034355215591779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community-based rehabilitation organizations (CBRO) play an important role in providing rehabilitation and support services to individuals with disabilities. Increased utilization of CBROs by state vocational rehabilitation (VR) agencies requires a better understanding of how evidence-based practices (EBPs) are used in CBROs. The aim of the study was to examine the readiness of CBRO practitioners to implement EBP, based on social-cognitive predictors of confidence in knowledge and use of EBP, expected benefits of EBP, and perceived barriers and supports to use EBP. A total of 187 CBRO practitioners were surveyed using the Evidence-Based Practice CBRO (EBP-CBRO) survey. Participants were in moderate agreement that they were ready to implement EBP. They were moderately confident in their knowledge about EBP, in high agreement about the expected improvements by using EBP, and perceived low barriers and moderate supports to implementing EBP. The social-cognitive predictors accounted for 55% of the variance in readiness to implement EBP, with knowledge about EBP as the most significant predictor of readiness to use EBP. Social-cognitive theory is a useful framework for exploring CBRO practitioners’ attitudes toward and knowledge of EBP. CBRO practitioners are in moderate agreement about readiness to use EBP. Improving practitioner confidence to use EBP might be the best means of increasing utilization.","PeriodicalId":47012,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin","volume":"60 1","pages":"15 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0034355215591779","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355215591779","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Community-based rehabilitation organizations (CBRO) play an important role in providing rehabilitation and support services to individuals with disabilities. Increased utilization of CBROs by state vocational rehabilitation (VR) agencies requires a better understanding of how evidence-based practices (EBPs) are used in CBROs. The aim of the study was to examine the readiness of CBRO practitioners to implement EBP, based on social-cognitive predictors of confidence in knowledge and use of EBP, expected benefits of EBP, and perceived barriers and supports to use EBP. A total of 187 CBRO practitioners were surveyed using the Evidence-Based Practice CBRO (EBP-CBRO) survey. Participants were in moderate agreement that they were ready to implement EBP. They were moderately confident in their knowledge about EBP, in high agreement about the expected improvements by using EBP, and perceived low barriers and moderate supports to implementing EBP. The social-cognitive predictors accounted for 55% of the variance in readiness to implement EBP, with knowledge about EBP as the most significant predictor of readiness to use EBP. Social-cognitive theory is a useful framework for exploring CBRO practitioners’ attitudes toward and knowledge of EBP. CBRO practitioners are in moderate agreement about readiness to use EBP. Improving practitioner confidence to use EBP might be the best means of increasing utilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准备使用循证实践的社会认知预测因素
社区康复组织在为残疾人提供康复和支持服务方面发挥着重要作用。国家职业康复(VR)机构提高对cbr的利用,需要更好地了解如何在cbr中使用循证实践(ebp)。本研究的目的是考察CBRO从业者实施EBP的准备程度,基于对EBP知识和使用的信心,EBP的预期收益,以及使用EBP的感知障碍和支持。采用循证实践CBRO (EBP-CBRO)调查共对187名CBRO从业人员进行了调查。参与者一致认为他们准备好实施EBP。他们对自己的EBP知识有中等程度的信心,对使用EBP预期的改善有高度的认同,并且认为实施EBP的障碍和支持程度较低。社会认知预测因子占实施EBP准备度方差的55%,其中关于EBP的知识是使用EBP准备度最显著的预测因子。社会认知理论是探究CBRO从业者对EBP的态度和知识的有用框架。CBRO从业者对使用EBP的准备程度有一定的共识。提高从业者使用EBP的信心可能是提高利用率的最佳手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin (RCB) publishes articles on rehabilitation counseling with a major emphasis on data-based research reports, although other types of contributions to professional knowledge in rehabilitation counseling will be considered. Examples include articles that explain an innovative technique or application, point/ counterpoint debates on a current controversy challenging the profession, or insightful essays on an important issue. Contributions of these kinds may be considered for a special section of RCB. Article topics cover a wide range—from ethical dilemmas related to counseling clients with HIV/AIDS to clinical problem solving in micro–case management.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric Validation of the PROMIS Social Support Scale in a Sample of Individuals With Chronic Health Conditions and Disabilities: A Factor Analytic Study Family Perspectives on Promoting Paid Employment for Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Continuing Education Answer Sheet For Volume 67, No 2 Attachment, Relationships, Academic Problems, and Negative Emotions in Student Veterans With Disabilities Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale: Translation, Reliability, and Validation Study of the Turkish Version
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1