Dalteparin Thromboprophylaxis in Cancer Patients at High Risk for Venous Thromboembolism: A Randomized Trial

IF 21 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Blood Pub Date : 2015-12-03 DOI:10.1182/blood.v126.23.427.427
A. Khorana, C. Francis, N. Kuderer, M. Carrier, T. Ortel, T. Wun, Derick R. Peterson, R. Iyer, G. Lyman
{"title":"Dalteparin Thromboprophylaxis in Cancer Patients at High Risk for Venous Thromboembolism: A Randomized Trial","authors":"A. Khorana, C. Francis, N. Kuderer, M. Carrier, T. Ortel, T. Wun, Derick R. Peterson, R. Iyer, G. Lyman","doi":"10.1182/blood.v126.23.427.427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ambulatory cancer patients at high-risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be identified using a validated risk score. We evaluated the benefit of outpatient thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin in such high-risk patients in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Methods: Cancer patients at high risk for VTE (Khorana score ≥3) and initiating a new systemic chemotherapy regimen were screened for VTE and, if negative, randomized to either dalteparin 5000 units daily subcutaneously or no prophylactic anticoagulation for 12 weeks. Subjects in both arms were screened with lower extremity ultrasounds every 4 weeks on study. Primary efficacy endpoint was any VTE over 12 weeks and primary safety endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding events over 13 weeks. The study was terminated due to poor accrual. Results: Of 117 enrolled patients, 19 were not randomized due to the presence of VTE on initial screening (N=10, 8.5%) or for other reasons (N=9). The mean age was 59 years with 46% female and 54% male, similar in both arms. The most common primary sites of cancer were pancreas, gastro-esophageal junction, lung and lymphoma. Over three-fourths of patients in each arm had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.Of 98 patients randomized, VTE occurred in 12% (N=6/50) of patients on the dalteparin arm and 21% (N=10/48) on the control arm (hazard ratio, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23-1.89) (absolute risk reduction 9%, relative risk reduction 42%, number needed to treat = 12). Major bleeding was similar (N=1) in each arm but clinically relevant bleeding was higher in the dalteparin arm (N=7 versus 1 in the control arm) (HR = 7.0, 95% CI 1.2-131.6). There was no difference in overall survival. Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis is associated with a non-significant reduced risk of VTE with no effect on major bleeding or survival but increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding in this underpowered study population. The Khorana score successfully identifies patients with high incidence of VTE both at baseline and during study. The high incidence of baseline VTE suggests that consideration should be given to screening high-risk patients in clinical practice prior to starting systemic therapy. Future studies should continue to focus on risk-adapted approaches to reduce the burden of VTE in cancer. (Funded by NIH/NHLBI R01HL095109; clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00876915). Disclosures Khorana:Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Randomized trial of dalteparin as prophylaxis. The drug is approved for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis but not for prophylaxis.. Francis:Eisai: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria; NHLBI: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy. Kuderer:Hospira: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Carrier:Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Ortel:Instrumentation Laboratory: Consultancy; Instrumentation Laboratory: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Wun:Janssen: Consultancy. Iyer:Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentec: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Lyman:Amgen: Research Funding.","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":"126 1","pages":"427-427"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v126.23.427.427","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: Ambulatory cancer patients at high-risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be identified using a validated risk score. We evaluated the benefit of outpatient thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin in such high-risk patients in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Methods: Cancer patients at high risk for VTE (Khorana score ≥3) and initiating a new systemic chemotherapy regimen were screened for VTE and, if negative, randomized to either dalteparin 5000 units daily subcutaneously or no prophylactic anticoagulation for 12 weeks. Subjects in both arms were screened with lower extremity ultrasounds every 4 weeks on study. Primary efficacy endpoint was any VTE over 12 weeks and primary safety endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding events over 13 weeks. The study was terminated due to poor accrual. Results: Of 117 enrolled patients, 19 were not randomized due to the presence of VTE on initial screening (N=10, 8.5%) or for other reasons (N=9). The mean age was 59 years with 46% female and 54% male, similar in both arms. The most common primary sites of cancer were pancreas, gastro-esophageal junction, lung and lymphoma. Over three-fourths of patients in each arm had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.Of 98 patients randomized, VTE occurred in 12% (N=6/50) of patients on the dalteparin arm and 21% (N=10/48) on the control arm (hazard ratio, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23-1.89) (absolute risk reduction 9%, relative risk reduction 42%, number needed to treat = 12). Major bleeding was similar (N=1) in each arm but clinically relevant bleeding was higher in the dalteparin arm (N=7 versus 1 in the control arm) (HR = 7.0, 95% CI 1.2-131.6). There was no difference in overall survival. Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis is associated with a non-significant reduced risk of VTE with no effect on major bleeding or survival but increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding in this underpowered study population. The Khorana score successfully identifies patients with high incidence of VTE both at baseline and during study. The high incidence of baseline VTE suggests that consideration should be given to screening high-risk patients in clinical practice prior to starting systemic therapy. Future studies should continue to focus on risk-adapted approaches to reduce the burden of VTE in cancer. (Funded by NIH/NHLBI R01HL095109; clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00876915). Disclosures Khorana:Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Randomized trial of dalteparin as prophylaxis. The drug is approved for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis but not for prophylaxis.. Francis:Eisai: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria; NHLBI: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy. Kuderer:Hospira: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Carrier:Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Ortel:Instrumentation Laboratory: Consultancy; Instrumentation Laboratory: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Wun:Janssen: Consultancy. Iyer:Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentec: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Lyman:Amgen: Research Funding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dalteparin在静脉血栓栓塞高危癌症患者中的血栓预防:一项随机试验
背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)高风险的门诊癌症患者可以通过有效的风险评分来识别。我们在一项多中心随机对照试验中评估了门诊用达特帕林预防这类高危患者血栓的益处。方法:对静脉血栓栓塞高风险(Khorana评分≥3)并开始新的全身化疗方案的癌症患者进行静脉血栓栓塞筛查,如果阴性,随机分配到每天5000单位的达特帕林皮下治疗或不进行预防性抗凝治疗12周。在研究中,每4周对双臂受试者进行下肢超声检查。主要疗效终点是超过12周的静脉血栓栓塞,主要安全性终点是超过13周的临床相关出血事件。本研究因收益不佳而终止。结果:117例入组患者中,19例因初始筛查时存在静脉血栓栓塞(N=10, 8.5%)或其他原因(N=9)而未被随机分组。平均年龄59岁,女性46%,男性54%,两臂相似。最常见的原发部位为胰腺、胃食管交界处、肺和淋巴瘤。每组中超过四分之三的患者ECOG表现状态为0或1。在随机分配的98例患者中,达特帕林组12% (N=6/50)的患者发生静脉血栓栓塞,对照组21% (N=10/48)(风险比,HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23-1.89)(绝对风险降低9%,相对风险降低42%,需要治疗的人数= 12)。各组大出血相似(N=1),但临床相关出血在达特帕林组较高(N=7,对照组1)(HR = 7.0, 95% CI 1.2-131.6)。总体生存期没有差异。结论:血栓预防与静脉血栓栓塞风险的非显著降低相关,对大出血或生存无影响,但增加了临床相关出血的风险。Khorana评分在基线和研究期间成功地识别出静脉血栓栓塞高发生率的患者。基线静脉血栓栓塞的高发生率提示,在开始全身治疗之前,应考虑在临床实践中筛查高危患者。未来的研究应继续关注风险适应方法,以减少静脉血栓栓塞在癌症中的负担。(NIH/NHLBI R01HL095109资助;clinicaltrials.gov识别码:NCT00876915)。Khorana:Leo Pharma:咨询、荣誉、实体董事会或咨询委员会成员;辉瑞:咨询,酬金;杨森:咨询、酬金、实体董事会或咨询委员会成员;勃林格殷格翰:咨询公司;Daiichi Sankyo:咨询公司;赛诺菲:咨询公司。标签外使用:dalteparin作为预防药物的随机试验。该药被批准用于治疗癌症相关血栓,但不用于预防。弗朗西斯:卫材:咨询,研究经费;Portola:咨询公司;NHLBI:咨询公司;莉莉:咨询公司。库德:Hospira:咨询公司;杨森:咨询、实体董事会或咨询委员会成员、研究经费;Daiichi Sankyo:咨询。Carrier:Leo Pharma:咨询、研究资助;BMS:研究经费;拜耳:咨询公司,酬金;辉瑞公司:咨询公司。Ortel:仪器实验室:咨询;仪器实验室:研究经费;卫材:科研经费;Daiichi Sankyo:咨询。荣获:詹森:咨询公司。律师:Ipsen制药:咨询;基因泰克:研究经费;百时美施贵宝:敬礼。莱曼:安进:研究经费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blood
Blood 医学-血液学
CiteScore
23.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
955
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Blood, the official journal of the American Society of Hematology, published online and in print, provides an international forum for the publication of original articles describing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. Primary research articles will be published under the following scientific categories: Clinical Trials and Observations; Gene Therapy; Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells; Immunobiology and Immunotherapy scope; Myeloid Neoplasia; Lymphoid Neoplasia; Phagocytes, Granulocytes and Myelopoiesis; Platelets and Thrombopoiesis; Red Cells, Iron and Erythropoiesis; Thrombosis and Hemostasis; Transfusion Medicine; Transplantation; and Vascular Biology. Papers can be listed under more than one category as appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of GPRC5D loss after anti-GPRC5D CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma. HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation for chronic granulomatous disease: an EBMT-IEWP retrospective study. A TIM-3-Fc decoy secreted by engineered T cells improves CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Beyond genotype: challenges in predicting disease risk for carriers of biallelic perforin variants. How I treat type 1 plasminogen deficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1