Non-invasive brain stimulation as a tool to study cerebellar-M1 interactions in humans.

Q3 Medicine Cerebellum and Ataxias Pub Date : 2016-11-16 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40673-016-0057-z
Sara Tremblay, Duncan Austin, Ricci Hannah, John C Rothwell
{"title":"Non-invasive brain stimulation as a tool to study cerebellar-M1 interactions in humans.","authors":"Sara Tremblay, Duncan Austin, Ricci Hannah, John C Rothwell","doi":"10.1186/s40673-016-0057-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent development of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has allowed the non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in humans. Early studies showed that cerebellar activity, as reflected in the excitability of the dentate-thalamo-cortical pathway, can be assessed with paired stimulation of the cerebellum and the primary motor cortex (M1) (cerebellar inhibition of motor cortex, CBI). Following this, many attempts have been made, using techniques such as repetitive TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), to modulate the activity of the cerebellum and the dentate-thalamo-cortical output, and measure their impact on M1 activity. The present article reviews literature concerned with the impact of non-invasive stimulation of cerebellum on M1 measures of excitability and \"plasticity\" in both healthy and clinical populations. The main conclusion from the 27 reviewed articles is that the effects of cerebellar \"plasticity\" protocols on M1 activity are generally inconsistent. Nevertheless, two measurements showed relatively reproducible effects in healthy individuals: reduced response of M1 to sensorimotor \"plasticity\" (paired-associative stimulation, PAS) and reduced CBI following repetitive TMS and TES. We discuss current challenges, such as the low power of reviewed studies, variability in stimulation parameters employed and lack of understanding of physiological mechanisms underlying CBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":36752,"journal":{"name":"Cerebellum and Ataxias","volume":"3 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebellum and Ataxias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40673-016-0057-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent development of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has allowed the non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in humans. Early studies showed that cerebellar activity, as reflected in the excitability of the dentate-thalamo-cortical pathway, can be assessed with paired stimulation of the cerebellum and the primary motor cortex (M1) (cerebellar inhibition of motor cortex, CBI). Following this, many attempts have been made, using techniques such as repetitive TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), to modulate the activity of the cerebellum and the dentate-thalamo-cortical output, and measure their impact on M1 activity. The present article reviews literature concerned with the impact of non-invasive stimulation of cerebellum on M1 measures of excitability and "plasticity" in both healthy and clinical populations. The main conclusion from the 27 reviewed articles is that the effects of cerebellar "plasticity" protocols on M1 activity are generally inconsistent. Nevertheless, two measurements showed relatively reproducible effects in healthy individuals: reduced response of M1 to sensorimotor "plasticity" (paired-associative stimulation, PAS) and reduced CBI following repetitive TMS and TES. We discuss current challenges, such as the low power of reviewed studies, variability in stimulation parameters employed and lack of understanding of physiological mechanisms underlying CBI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无创脑刺激作为研究人类小脑- m1相互作用的工具。
近年来,经颅磁刺激(TMS)等非侵入性脑刺激技术的发展使得对人类小脑功能的非侵入性评估成为可能。早期研究表明,小脑活动,反映在齿状-丘脑-皮层通路的兴奋性,可以通过小脑和初级运动皮质(M1)的配对刺激(小脑抑制运动皮质,CBI)来评估。在此之后,许多人尝试使用重复性经颅磁刺激和经颅电刺激(TES)等技术来调节小脑和齿状丘脑皮层输出的活动,并测量它们对M1活动的影响。本文综述了有关小脑非侵入性刺激对健康和临床人群M1兴奋性和“可塑性”测量的影响的文献。从27篇综述文章中得出的主要结论是,小脑“可塑性”方案对M1活性的影响通常不一致。然而,两项测量结果在健康个体中显示了相对可重复的影响:M1对感觉运动“可塑性”(配对联想刺激,PAS)的反应降低,重复TMS和TES后CBI降低。我们讨论了当前面临的挑战,例如回顾研究的低功率,所采用的刺激参数的可变性以及缺乏对CBI生理机制的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebellum and Ataxias
Cerebellum and Ataxias Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rare occurrence of severe blindness and deafness in Friedreich ataxia: a case report. Recognition and management of rapid-onset gluten ataxias: case series. Relationships between motor scores and cognitive functioning in FMR1 female premutation X carriers indicate early involvement of cerebello-cerebral pathways. Anti-Tr/DNER antibody paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration preceding a very late relapse of Hodgkin Lymphoma after 12 years. The cerebellum-driven social basis of mathematics: implications for one-on-one tutoring of children with mathematics learning disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1