Minimally invasive facet restoration implant for chronic lumbar zygapophysial pain: 1-year outcomes.

Annals of surgical innovation and research Pub Date : 2014-10-18 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13022-014-0007-5
Hans-Jörg Meisel, Konrad Seller, Achim L Th, Karin B Ttner-Janz, Peter Stosberg, Alexander Moser, Larry E Miller, Jon E Block, Luiz Pimenta
{"title":"Minimally invasive facet restoration implant for chronic lumbar zygapophysial pain: 1-year outcomes.","authors":"Hans-Jörg Meisel, Konrad Seller, Achim L Th, Karin B Ttner-Janz, Peter Stosberg, Alexander Moser, Larry E Miller, Jon E Block, Luiz Pimenta","doi":"10.1186/s13022-014-0007-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The zygapophysial (facet) joint is the primary pain generator in one third of chronic low back pain cases. Current treatment options include temporarily palliative nonsurgical approaches, facet injections, radiofrequency denervation, and, rarely, lumbar arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive implant intended to restore facet joint function in patients with chronic lumbar facetogenic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multi-center feasibility study enrolled patients with confirmed lumbar facetogenic joint pain at 1 or 2 levels who underwent at least 6 months of unsuccessful nonoperative care. Patients received a minimally invasive implant (Glyder® Facet Restoration Device, Zyga Technology, Inc., Minnetonka, MN) intended to restore facet joint function while preserving the native anatomy. Main outcomes included back pain severity using a visual analogue scale, back-specific disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and adverse events adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 40 enrolled patients, 37 patients received the facet restoration implant and 34 patients had complete 1-year follow-up data available. Over the 1-year follow-up period, back pain severity decreased 41% and ODI decreased 34%, on average. Freedom from a device- or procedure-related serious adverse event through 1 year was 84%. Implant migration was observed in 3 patients and implant expulsion from the facet joint occurred in 3 patients. In total, 2 (5.4%) patients underwent implant removal through 1 year post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A minimally invasive facet restoration implant is a promising treatment option in select patients with chronic lumbar zygapophysial pain who have exhausted nonsurgical treatments, with therapeutic benefit persisting at 1 year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":87428,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgical innovation and research","volume":"8 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4665199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgical innovation and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13022-014-0007-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The zygapophysial (facet) joint is the primary pain generator in one third of chronic low back pain cases. Current treatment options include temporarily palliative nonsurgical approaches, facet injections, radiofrequency denervation, and, rarely, lumbar arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive implant intended to restore facet joint function in patients with chronic lumbar facetogenic pain.

Methods: This prospective, multi-center feasibility study enrolled patients with confirmed lumbar facetogenic joint pain at 1 or 2 levels who underwent at least 6 months of unsuccessful nonoperative care. Patients received a minimally invasive implant (Glyder® Facet Restoration Device, Zyga Technology, Inc., Minnetonka, MN) intended to restore facet joint function while preserving the native anatomy. Main outcomes included back pain severity using a visual analogue scale, back-specific disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and adverse events adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee.

Results: Of 40 enrolled patients, 37 patients received the facet restoration implant and 34 patients had complete 1-year follow-up data available. Over the 1-year follow-up period, back pain severity decreased 41% and ODI decreased 34%, on average. Freedom from a device- or procedure-related serious adverse event through 1 year was 84%. Implant migration was observed in 3 patients and implant expulsion from the facet joint occurred in 3 patients. In total, 2 (5.4%) patients underwent implant removal through 1 year post-treatment.

Conclusions: A minimally invasive facet restoration implant is a promising treatment option in select patients with chronic lumbar zygapophysial pain who have exhausted nonsurgical treatments, with therapeutic benefit persisting at 1 year follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创面修复植入物治疗慢性腰椎颧骨疼痛:1 年疗效。
背景:在三分之一的慢性腰痛病例中,颧骨(面)关节是主要的疼痛发生部位。目前的治疗方法包括暂时缓解疼痛的非手术疗法、面神经注射、射频去神经支配,以及罕见的腰椎关节置换术。本研究旨在评估一种旨在恢复慢性腰椎面源性疼痛患者面关节功能的微创植入物的安全性和有效性:这项前瞻性、多中心可行性研究招募了确诊腰椎1或2个关节水平面源性疼痛、接受至少6个月非手术治疗未果的患者。患者接受了一种微创植入物(Glyder® Facet Restoration Device,Zyga Technology, Inc.,Minnetonka, MN),旨在恢复面关节功能,同时保留原生解剖结构。主要结果包括使用视觉模拟量表测量的背痛严重程度、使用奥斯韦特里残疾指数(ODI)测量的背部残疾程度,以及由独立临床事件委员会裁定的不良事件:在40名登记患者中,37名患者接受了面修复植入物,34名患者有完整的1年随访数据。在1年的随访期间,背部疼痛的严重程度平均下降了41%,ODI平均下降了34%。在一年的随访中,84%的患者未发生与设备或手术相关的严重不良事件。有 3 名患者的植入物发生了移位,3 名患者的植入物从面关节中脱出。治疗后一年内,共有2名患者(5.4%)进行了植入物移除手术:结论:微创面修复植入物对于非手术治疗无效的慢性腰椎颧骨疼痛患者是一种很有前景的治疗选择,随访1年后仍有疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel treatments for complications after bariatric surgery Assessment of central venous catheterization in a simulated model using a motion-tracking device: an experimental validation study Current Outcomes of Laparoscopic Duodenal Switch Benefits of intraoperative endoscopy: case report and review of 300 sleeves gastrectomies Development of automated postoperative enteral nutrition: restricting feeding site inflow to match peristaltic outflow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1