Does maxillomandibular fixation affect skeletal stability following mandibular advancement? A single-blind clinical trial.

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2022-05-06 DOI:10.1186/s40902-022-00350-w
Reza Tabrizi, Arash Sarrafzadeh, Shervin Shafiei, Hamidreza Moslemi, Ramtin Dastgir
{"title":"Does maxillomandibular fixation affect skeletal stability following mandibular advancement? A single-blind clinical trial.","authors":"Reza Tabrizi, Arash Sarrafzadeh, Shervin Shafiei, Hamidreza Moslemi, Ramtin Dastgir","doi":"10.1186/s40902-022-00350-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The stability of the results remains a significant concern in orthognathic surgeries. This study aimed to assess the amount of relapse following mandibular advancement with/without maxillomandibular fixation (MMF).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-blind clinical trial was conducted on patients with mandibular retrognathism who underwent BSSO for mandibular advancement and Lefort I maxillary superior repositioning. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of treatment (MMF) and control (no MMF). In the treatment group, MMF was performed for 2 weeks; meanwhile, MMF was not performed in the control group, and only guiding elastics were applied postoperatively. Lateral cephalograms were obtained preoperatively (T1), immediately after surgery (T2), and at 1 year postoperatively (T3). The distance from points A and B to the X and Y plane were measured to identify the amount of vertical and horizontal relapse in 1 year as a primary outcome. An independent t-test was applied in order to find differences in outcomes between the control and treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients were evaluated in two groups (28 patients in the MMF group and 30 in the no-MMF group). The magnitude of mandibular advancement following BSSO was 7.68±1.39 mm and 7.53±1.28, respectively, without significant difference among the groups (p= 0.68). The mean sagittal and vertical changes (relapse) at point B were significantly different between the two groups at 1-year follow-up after the osteotomy (p=0.001 and p=0.05, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results of this study, patients with short-term MMF following BSSO for mandibular advancement benefit from significantly greater skeletal stability in the sagittal and vertical dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9076785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00350-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The stability of the results remains a significant concern in orthognathic surgeries. This study aimed to assess the amount of relapse following mandibular advancement with/without maxillomandibular fixation (MMF).

Materials and methods: A single-blind clinical trial was conducted on patients with mandibular retrognathism who underwent BSSO for mandibular advancement and Lefort I maxillary superior repositioning. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of treatment (MMF) and control (no MMF). In the treatment group, MMF was performed for 2 weeks; meanwhile, MMF was not performed in the control group, and only guiding elastics were applied postoperatively. Lateral cephalograms were obtained preoperatively (T1), immediately after surgery (T2), and at 1 year postoperatively (T3). The distance from points A and B to the X and Y plane were measured to identify the amount of vertical and horizontal relapse in 1 year as a primary outcome. An independent t-test was applied in order to find differences in outcomes between the control and treatment groups.

Results: Fifty-eight patients were evaluated in two groups (28 patients in the MMF group and 30 in the no-MMF group). The magnitude of mandibular advancement following BSSO was 7.68±1.39 mm and 7.53±1.28, respectively, without significant difference among the groups (p= 0.68). The mean sagittal and vertical changes (relapse) at point B were significantly different between the two groups at 1-year follow-up after the osteotomy (p=0.001 and p=0.05, respectively).

Conclusion: According to the results of this study, patients with short-term MMF following BSSO for mandibular advancement benefit from significantly greater skeletal stability in the sagittal and vertical dimensions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下颌前突术后上颌骨固定是否会影响骨骼稳定性?单盲临床试验。
背景:在正颌手术中,手术效果的稳定性仍是一个重要问题。本研究旨在评估下颌前移术后使用/不使用上颌下颌固定术(MMF)的复发率:对下颌后突患者进行了单盲临床试验,这些患者接受了下颌前突BSSO手术和Lefort I上颌骨上部复位手术。患者被随机分为治疗组(MMF)和对照组(无 MMF)。治疗组进行为期两周的MMF治疗;而对照组则不进行MMF治疗,术后仅使用引导弹力袜。分别在术前(T1)、术后即刻(T2)和术后一年(T3)拍摄侧位头颅片。测量 A 点和 B 点到 X 平面和 Y 平面的距离,以确定 1 年后垂直和水平方向的复发量作为主要结果。为了发现对照组和治疗组之间的结果差异,采用了独立的 t 检验:58名患者分两组接受了评估(MMF组28人,无MMF组30人)。BSSO术后下颌骨前移的幅度分别为(7.68±1.39)毫米和(7.53±1.28)毫米,两组间无显著差异(P= 0.68)。截骨后随访1年,B点的平均矢状变和垂直变(复发)在两组间有显著差异(分别为P=0.001和P=0.05):根据这项研究的结果,下颌前突BSSO术后短期MMF患者在矢状和垂直方向上的骨骼稳定性明显更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A retrospective epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures at a tertiary referral hospital in istanbul: a seven-year study of 1,757 patients. Egyptian patients with cleft lip: our experience with primary rhinoplasty. Volume changes in the contralateral submandibular gland following unilateral gland excision in oral cancer patients. Clinical outcomes of NBF gel application in managing mucositis associated with xerostomia. Changes in mandibular width and frontal-lower facial profile after orthognathic surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy with removal of internal bone interference in patients with class III skeletal malocclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1