{"title":"Martin de Barcos: Grace, Predestination, and Jansenism","authors":"M. Moriarty","doi":"10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Martin de Barcos’s posthumously published Exposition de la foy de l’Eglise romaine touchant la grâce et la prédestination is an important restatement of what he takes to be St Augustine’s doctrine on these matters. The first edition (1697) was condemned by the Archbishop of Paris, Louis-Antoine de Noailles, as a restatement of Jansenist doctrine, which, broken down into five key propositions, had been condemned by Innocent X in 1653. The ‘Remarques’ published with the second edition of 1700 argue that the Exposition by no means endorses the doctrines contained in the Five Propositions, and that the papal condemnation of these is thus irrelevant. This claim is assessed in a detailed analysis of the ‘Remarques’ and of the main text of the Exposition. In conclusion there is a brief discussion of the relationship of Barcos’s account of grace to Pascal’s and of the attempt to distinguish their views from those of the Calvinists.","PeriodicalId":88312,"journal":{"name":"Seventeenth-century French studies","volume":"35 1","pages":"148 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000031","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seventeenth-century French studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract Martin de Barcos’s posthumously published Exposition de la foy de l’Eglise romaine touchant la grâce et la prédestination is an important restatement of what he takes to be St Augustine’s doctrine on these matters. The first edition (1697) was condemned by the Archbishop of Paris, Louis-Antoine de Noailles, as a restatement of Jansenist doctrine, which, broken down into five key propositions, had been condemned by Innocent X in 1653. The ‘Remarques’ published with the second edition of 1700 argue that the Exposition by no means endorses the doctrines contained in the Five Propositions, and that the papal condemnation of these is thus irrelevant. This claim is assessed in a detailed analysis of the ‘Remarques’ and of the main text of the Exposition. In conclusion there is a brief discussion of the relationship of Barcos’s account of grace to Pascal’s and of the attempt to distinguish their views from those of the Calvinists.
马丁·德·巴尔科斯死后出版的《关于浪漫的接触与生活》是他认为是圣奥古斯丁在这些问题上的学说的重要重述。第一版(1697年)被巴黎大主教路易-安托万·德·诺埃尔(Louis-Antoine de Noailles)谴责为对詹森主义教义的重述,该教义被分解为五个关键命题,曾在1653年被英诺森十世(Innocent X)谴责。与1700年第二版一起出版的“注释”认为,《说明会》绝不赞同“五大命题”中的教义,因此教皇对这些教义的谴责是无关紧要的。这一主张在对“评注”和论述主要文本的详细分析中得到了评估。最后,简要讨论了巴可斯对恩典的描述与帕斯卡的关系,并试图将他们的观点与加尔文主义者的观点区分开来。