Music Educator Views on String and/or Orchestral Participation in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi

Q1 Arts and Humanities String Research Journal Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI:10.1177/194849921600700104
J. Kuehne, G. Harrison
{"title":"Music Educator Views on String and/or Orchestral Participation in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi","authors":"J. Kuehne, G. Harrison","doi":"10.1177/194849921600700104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to discover music educators’ views on string music education by surveying active NAfME members in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and to compare results based on teaching area: string/orchestra (SO) and non-string/orchestra (NSO). While statistically we cannot generalize results because of the response rate and numbers of SO and NSO teachers in our study, those who responded to our online survey support our hypothesis that fewer string/orchestra programs exist in our four focus states than other U.S. regions. Respondents agreed that string/orchestra programs would benefit overall music programs, allowing for more student participation. However, results suggest some NSO teachers choose program preservation over music program diversification, and ultimately student opportunities for music participation. The largest barriers to implementation of new programs were financial costs and administrative support, then scheduling, availability of qualified teachers, and lack of facilities. It is unclear if NSO teachers’ views represent an “unspoken” barrier. Additional research to determine reasons for fewer programs is needed to increase the numbers of string/orchestra programs and enrollment in existing programs.","PeriodicalId":36814,"journal":{"name":"String Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/194849921600700104","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"String Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/194849921600700104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to discover music educators’ views on string music education by surveying active NAfME members in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and to compare results based on teaching area: string/orchestra (SO) and non-string/orchestra (NSO). While statistically we cannot generalize results because of the response rate and numbers of SO and NSO teachers in our study, those who responded to our online survey support our hypothesis that fewer string/orchestra programs exist in our four focus states than other U.S. regions. Respondents agreed that string/orchestra programs would benefit overall music programs, allowing for more student participation. However, results suggest some NSO teachers choose program preservation over music program diversification, and ultimately student opportunities for music participation. The largest barriers to implementation of new programs were financial costs and administrative support, then scheduling, availability of qualified teachers, and lack of facilities. It is unclear if NSO teachers’ views represent an “unspoken” barrier. Additional research to determine reasons for fewer programs is needed to increase the numbers of string/orchestra programs and enrollment in existing programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在阿拉巴马州,阿肯色州,路易斯安那州和密西西比州,音乐教育家对弦乐和/或管弦乐参与的看法
本研究旨在通过调查美国阿拉巴马州、阿肯色州、路易斯安那州、密西西比州的NAfME活跃成员,了解音乐教育者对弦乐教育的看法,并比较基于教学领域:弦乐/管弦乐队(SO)和非弦乐/管弦乐队(NSO)的结果。虽然统计上我们无法概括结果,因为在我们的研究中,SO和NSO教师的回答率和数量,但那些回应我们在线调查的人支持我们的假设,即在我们的四个重点州,弦乐/管弦乐队的课程比美国其他地区少。受访者同意弦乐/管弦乐队课程将有利于整体音乐课程,允许更多的学生参与。然而,研究结果表明,一些NSO教师选择保留课程,而不是选择音乐课程的多样化,最终选择学生参与音乐的机会。实施新项目的最大障碍是财政成本和行政支持,其次是日程安排、合格教师的可用性和设施的缺乏。目前尚不清楚国家统计局教师的观点是否代表着一种“未说出口”的障碍。需要进一步的研究来确定项目减少的原因,以增加弦乐/管弦乐队项目的数量和现有项目的入学率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
String Research Journal
String Research Journal Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
String Teachers on the Challenges of Intonation: A Report From Sweden Using Storytelling to Enrich Expressiveness Among Young String Players Fire on the Bayou: The Status of School Orchestra and String Programs in Louisiana An Analysis of Double Bass Vibrato A Content Analysis of Doctoral Research in String Education, 1992–2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1