Parting Ways or Rival Siblings? A Review and Analysis of Metaphors for the Separation of Jews and Christians in Antiquity

IF 0.6 0 RELIGION Currents in Biblical Research Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.1177/1476993X20970435
T. A. Gabrielson
{"title":"Parting Ways or Rival Siblings? A Review and Analysis of Metaphors for the Separation of Jews and Christians in Antiquity","authors":"T. A. Gabrielson","doi":"10.1177/1476993X20970435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the early 1990s, ‘the parting of the ways’ has become academic shorthand, especially in anglophone scholarship, for the separation of Jews and Christians in antiquity. Often it is associated with a onetime, global break that occurred by the end of the second century, particularly over one or more theological issues. This model has been challenged as being too tidy. Other images have been offered, most notably that of ‘rival siblings’, but the ‘parting’ model remains supreme. Consensus has shifted in other ways, however. The ‘parting’, or better, ‘partings’, is now understood to be a localized, protracted, and multifaceted process that likely began in the second century and continued into or past the fourth century. It is also suggested here that the current debate covers five distinguishable topics: (1) mutual religious recognition, (2) the continued existence of ‘Jewish Christians’, (3) religious interaction, (4) social concourse, and (5) outsider classification.","PeriodicalId":43066,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Biblical Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"178 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1476993X20970435","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Biblical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993X20970435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the early 1990s, ‘the parting of the ways’ has become academic shorthand, especially in anglophone scholarship, for the separation of Jews and Christians in antiquity. Often it is associated with a onetime, global break that occurred by the end of the second century, particularly over one or more theological issues. This model has been challenged as being too tidy. Other images have been offered, most notably that of ‘rival siblings’, but the ‘parting’ model remains supreme. Consensus has shifted in other ways, however. The ‘parting’, or better, ‘partings’, is now understood to be a localized, protracted, and multifaceted process that likely began in the second century and continued into or past the fourth century. It is also suggested here that the current debate covers five distinguishable topics: (1) mutual religious recognition, (2) the continued existence of ‘Jewish Christians’, (3) religious interaction, (4) social concourse, and (5) outsider classification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分手还是兄弟姐妹?古代犹太人与基督徒分离的隐喻回顾与分析
自20世纪90年代初以来,“the parted of the ways”已成为学术界(尤其是英语国家的学术界)对古代犹太人和基督徒分离的简称。它通常与二世纪末发生的一次全球性的分裂有关,特别是在一个或多个神学问题上。这种模式因过于整洁而受到质疑。人们还提供了其他的照片,最著名的是“兄弟姐妹竞争”的照片,但“分手”的照片仍然是最重要的。然而,共识在其他方面发生了转变。“离别”,或者更好的说法是“离别”,现在被理解为是一个局部的,长期的,多方面的过程,可能开始于二世纪,并持续到或超过四世纪。这里还建议当前的辩论涵盖五个可区分的主题:(1)相互宗教承认,(2)“犹太基督徒”的继续存在,(3)宗教互动,(4)社会集会,(5)局外人分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Abbreviation List The Amanuensis Hypothesis in New Testament Scholarship: Its Origin, Evidential Basis, and Application Editorial Foreword Becoming god: Interpreting Pauline soteriology as deification Abbreviation List
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1