{"title":"Parting Ways or Rival Siblings? A Review and Analysis of Metaphors for the Separation of Jews and Christians in Antiquity","authors":"T. A. Gabrielson","doi":"10.1177/1476993X20970435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the early 1990s, ‘the parting of the ways’ has become academic shorthand, especially in anglophone scholarship, for the separation of Jews and Christians in antiquity. Often it is associated with a onetime, global break that occurred by the end of the second century, particularly over one or more theological issues. This model has been challenged as being too tidy. Other images have been offered, most notably that of ‘rival siblings’, but the ‘parting’ model remains supreme. Consensus has shifted in other ways, however. The ‘parting’, or better, ‘partings’, is now understood to be a localized, protracted, and multifaceted process that likely began in the second century and continued into or past the fourth century. It is also suggested here that the current debate covers five distinguishable topics: (1) mutual religious recognition, (2) the continued existence of ‘Jewish Christians’, (3) religious interaction, (4) social concourse, and (5) outsider classification.","PeriodicalId":43066,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Biblical Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"178 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1476993X20970435","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Biblical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993X20970435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since the early 1990s, ‘the parting of the ways’ has become academic shorthand, especially in anglophone scholarship, for the separation of Jews and Christians in antiquity. Often it is associated with a onetime, global break that occurred by the end of the second century, particularly over one or more theological issues. This model has been challenged as being too tidy. Other images have been offered, most notably that of ‘rival siblings’, but the ‘parting’ model remains supreme. Consensus has shifted in other ways, however. The ‘parting’, or better, ‘partings’, is now understood to be a localized, protracted, and multifaceted process that likely began in the second century and continued into or past the fourth century. It is also suggested here that the current debate covers five distinguishable topics: (1) mutual religious recognition, (2) the continued existence of ‘Jewish Christians’, (3) religious interaction, (4) social concourse, and (5) outsider classification.
自20世纪90年代初以来,“the parted of the ways”已成为学术界(尤其是英语国家的学术界)对古代犹太人和基督徒分离的简称。它通常与二世纪末发生的一次全球性的分裂有关,特别是在一个或多个神学问题上。这种模式因过于整洁而受到质疑。人们还提供了其他的照片,最著名的是“兄弟姐妹竞争”的照片,但“分手”的照片仍然是最重要的。然而,共识在其他方面发生了转变。“离别”,或者更好的说法是“离别”,现在被理解为是一个局部的,长期的,多方面的过程,可能开始于二世纪,并持续到或超过四世纪。这里还建议当前的辩论涵盖五个可区分的主题:(1)相互宗教承认,(2)“犹太基督徒”的继续存在,(3)宗教互动,(4)社会集会,(5)局外人分类。