The paradox of serving: Can genuine servant leadership gain followers’ respect for the leader? Evidence from Germany and Lithuania

Armin Pircher Verdorfer
{"title":"The paradox of serving: Can genuine servant leadership gain followers’ respect for the leader? Evidence from Germany and Lithuania","authors":"Armin Pircher Verdorfer","doi":"10.1177/2397002218793840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing body of research shows that servant leadership is related to important organizational outcomes. Yet far less attention has been given to the mechanisms of servant leadership. This is particularly true for those dimensions of servant leadership that are inherently paradoxical and run counter to the common notion of leaders as strong influencers. In an effort to contribute to servant leadership research, this study investigated the relation between perceived genuine servant leadership behaviours (i.e. standing back, humility, authenticity) and respect for the leader, reflecting followers’ acceptance of their leader’s influence. Survey data were collected from 438 employees from various organizations in Germany and Lithuania and analysed via multi-group structural equation modelling. Results showed that the positive relation between perceived genuine servant leadership and respect for the leader was sequentially mediated by followers’ perceptions of alignment with ideal leader prototype and personal identification with the leader. Overall, this study elucidates the interplay between leadership and service, enhancing the understanding of how perceived genuine servant leadership has positive effects on followers. By drawing on two samples from different cultural clusters, this study strengthens the validity of the results and thus also contributes more generally to the cross-cultural applicability of servant leadership.","PeriodicalId":43391,"journal":{"name":"German Journal of Human Resource Management-Zeitschrift Fur Personalforschung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2397002218793840","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Journal of Human Resource Management-Zeitschrift Fur Personalforschung","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002218793840","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A growing body of research shows that servant leadership is related to important organizational outcomes. Yet far less attention has been given to the mechanisms of servant leadership. This is particularly true for those dimensions of servant leadership that are inherently paradoxical and run counter to the common notion of leaders as strong influencers. In an effort to contribute to servant leadership research, this study investigated the relation between perceived genuine servant leadership behaviours (i.e. standing back, humility, authenticity) and respect for the leader, reflecting followers’ acceptance of their leader’s influence. Survey data were collected from 438 employees from various organizations in Germany and Lithuania and analysed via multi-group structural equation modelling. Results showed that the positive relation between perceived genuine servant leadership and respect for the leader was sequentially mediated by followers’ perceptions of alignment with ideal leader prototype and personal identification with the leader. Overall, this study elucidates the interplay between leadership and service, enhancing the understanding of how perceived genuine servant leadership has positive effects on followers. By drawing on two samples from different cultural clusters, this study strengthens the validity of the results and thus also contributes more generally to the cross-cultural applicability of servant leadership.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服务的悖论:真正的仆人式领导能赢得追随者对领导者的尊重吗?来自德国和立陶宛的证据
越来越多的研究表明,服务型领导与重要的组织成果有关。然而,对仆人式领导机制的关注要少得多。对于仆人式领导的那些方面来说尤其如此,这些方面本质上是矛盾的,与领导者是强大影响者的普遍观念背道而驰。为了对仆人式领导研究做出贡献,本研究调查了感知到的真正仆人式领导行为(即退后、谦逊、真实)与对领导者的尊重之间的关系,反映了追随者对领导者影响的接受程度。调查数据来自德国和立陶宛不同组织的438名员工,并通过多组结构方程模型进行分析。结果表明,真正仆人式领导感知与领导者尊重之间的正向关系依次被追随者对理想领导者原型的一致性感知和对领导者的个人认同感知所中介。总体而言,本研究阐明了领导与服务之间的相互作用,增强了对感知到的真正仆人式领导如何对追随者产生积极影响的理解。通过选取两个来自不同文化集群的样本,本研究增强了结果的有效性,从而也为仆人式领导的跨文化适用性做出了更广泛的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The German Journal of Human Resource Management (GHRM) formerly Zeitschrift für Personalforschung (ZfP), is a leading peer-reviewed resource for the international HR community, with a global reach and editorial board. It publishes quarterly and aims to advance scientific knowledge covering a broad spectrum of research topics related to human resource management, employment relations, behaviour in organisations and personnel economics. It publishes both theoretical articles as well as empirical work and is open to a wide range of methodological approaches. Original contributions are published in English and German.
期刊最新文献
The innovative power of actual–desired misfit in task identity: The mediating role of job crafting Distributed interactive decision-making for sustainable careers: How do executives interact with their career context when making decisions to sustain their careers? The multifaceted influence of age on employee work engagement: Examining the interactive effects of chronological age, relational age, and perceived age-related treatment Health-oriented leadership: Antecedents of leaders’ awareness regarding warning signals of emerging depression and burnout ‘Beyond the clash?’: Union–management partnership through social dialogue on sustainable HRM. Lessons from Belgium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1