Predictors and Acceptability of Shared Physical Activity Participation in Parent–Child Dyads

Patrick M. Filanowski, S. Camhi, Jessica A Whiteley, R. Iannotti, L. Milliken
{"title":"Predictors and Acceptability of Shared Physical Activity Participation in Parent–Child Dyads","authors":"Patrick M. Filanowski, S. Camhi, Jessica A Whiteley, R. Iannotti, L. Milliken","doi":"10.1249/TJX.0000000000000154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shared physical activity (PA) in children and their parents is an approach to increase PA participation for both children and adults. Understanding variables associated with shared PA is essential to inform effective, tailored PA interventions for families. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors and to assess the acceptability of shared PA in parent – child dyads. Each parent – child dyad ( n = 31; mean ± SD age, parents: 38.0 ± 6.6 yr, children: 5.9 ± 1.7 yr) was guided through five standardized PAs (brisk walking, jumping games, body-weight exercises, dancing, and tag games) at a research fitness center. Parents reported demographic characteristics and PA-related variables (i.e., PA self-efficacy, family chaos, and annual household income). One week later, parents ( n = 28) reported their dyad ’ s weekly minutes spent in shared PA. A forward selection procedure was used to determine the optimal regression model for predicting minutes of shared PA. McNemar ’ s tests were used to determine the dyad ’ s acceptability of each shared PA. Lower family chaos ( β = − 19.41, P = 0.034), higher parent body mass index ( β = 7.65, P = 0.003), and higher annual household income ( β = 11.85, P = 0.023) predicted minutes of shared PA. Jumping games, body-weight exercises, dancing, and tag games were not acceptable for parent – child dyads to participate in together ( P < 0.05). Brisk walking was an acceptable shared PA ( P = 0.125). Lower family chaos, higher parent body mass index, and higher annual household income predicted shared PA. Brisk walking was an acceptable PA for parent – child dyads to participate outside of a research laboratory setting. These results can aid future PA programs that include children and parents together.","PeriodicalId":75243,"journal":{"name":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/TJX.0000000000000154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Shared physical activity (PA) in children and their parents is an approach to increase PA participation for both children and adults. Understanding variables associated with shared PA is essential to inform effective, tailored PA interventions for families. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors and to assess the acceptability of shared PA in parent – child dyads. Each parent – child dyad ( n = 31; mean ± SD age, parents: 38.0 ± 6.6 yr, children: 5.9 ± 1.7 yr) was guided through five standardized PAs (brisk walking, jumping games, body-weight exercises, dancing, and tag games) at a research fitness center. Parents reported demographic characteristics and PA-related variables (i.e., PA self-efficacy, family chaos, and annual household income). One week later, parents ( n = 28) reported their dyad ’ s weekly minutes spent in shared PA. A forward selection procedure was used to determine the optimal regression model for predicting minutes of shared PA. McNemar ’ s tests were used to determine the dyad ’ s acceptability of each shared PA. Lower family chaos ( β = − 19.41, P = 0.034), higher parent body mass index ( β = 7.65, P = 0.003), and higher annual household income ( β = 11.85, P = 0.023) predicted minutes of shared PA. Jumping games, body-weight exercises, dancing, and tag games were not acceptable for parent – child dyads to participate in together ( P < 0.05). Brisk walking was an acceptable shared PA ( P = 0.125). Lower family chaos, higher parent body mass index, and higher annual household income predicted shared PA. Brisk walking was an acceptable PA for parent – child dyads to participate outside of a research laboratory setting. These results can aid future PA programs that include children and parents together.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲子共同参与体育活动的预测因素及可接受性
儿童及其父母共同参与体育活动(PA)是提高儿童和成人参与体育活动的一种方法。了解与共享PA相关的变量对于为家庭提供有效的、量身定制的PA干预措施至关重要。本研究的目的是确定预测因子,并评估亲子二代共享PA的可接受性。每一对父子(n = 31;平均±SD年龄,父母:38.0±6.6岁,儿童:5.9±1.7岁)在研究健身中心被引导完成5个标准化PAs(快走、跳跃游戏、体重练习、舞蹈和标签游戏)。父母报告了人口统计学特征和PA相关变量(即PA自我效能、家庭混乱和家庭年收入)。一周后,父母(n = 28)报告了他们的孩子每周花在共享PA上的时间。采用前向选择程序确定预测共享PA分钟数的最佳回归模型。McNemar的测试被用来确定每个共享PA的可接受性。较低的家庭混乱(β = - 19.41, P = 0.034)、较高的父母体重指数(β = 7.65, P = 0.003)和较高的家庭年收入(β = 11.85, P = 0.023)与共享PA时间相关。跳跃类游戏、体重类游戏、舞蹈类游戏和标签类游戏不适合亲子二人组共同参与(P < 0.05)。快走是可接受的共享PA (P = 0.125)。较低的家庭混乱、较高的父母体重指数和较高的家庭年收入预测共享PA。快走是一种可接受的亲子二人组参与研究实验室设置之外的PA。这些结果可以帮助未来包括儿童和家长在内的PA项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lifestyle strategies after intentional weight loss: results from the MAINTAIN-pc randomized trial. Associations of physical and social workplace characteristics with movement behaviors at work. Demographic, Clinical, and Psychosocial Predictors of Exercise Adherence: The STRRIDE Trials. Framework to Classify Physical Activity Intervention Studies for Older Adults Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine: 2022 Paper of the Year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1