Carbon dioxide storage potential for the Queenston Formation near the AES Cayuga coal-fired power plant in Tompkins County, New York

Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Environmental Geosciences Pub Date : 2011-03-01 DOI:10.1306/EG.05191010005
K. Tamulonis, T. Jordan, Brian E. Slater
{"title":"Carbon dioxide storage potential for the Queenston Formation near the AES Cayuga coal-fired power plant in Tompkins County, New York","authors":"K. Tamulonis, T. Jordan, Brian E. Slater","doi":"10.1306/EG.05191010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated the pore volume available for a specific potential geologic carbon dioxide (CO2) storage site in the Upper Ordovician Queenston Formation near the AES Corporation Cayuga coal-fired power plant in Tompkins County, New York. Core data collected 25 mi (40 km) from the plant reveal that the Queenston Formation is a relatively homogeneous fine- to medium-grained sandstone with hematite cement. Seismic and core data indicate that the formation was deposited in a fluvial system with mobile channels and has thickness maxima that trend north-northwest. Porosity is a major factor affecting geologic CO2 storage potential, and it is important to understand discrepancies among porosity measured from core plug, neutron porosity, density-derived porosity, and thin-section point count values. Relative to core plug–derived porosity values, the neutron porosity log is more reliable than the electron density porosity values. Thin sections reveal that hematite cement is the primary factor affecting porosity variability. Seismic, core, and well-log data suggest that in a 25-mi2 (65-km2) area surrounding this power plant, the Queenston Formation can sequester 18 million metric tons (11 million metric tons) of CO2 emission from the Cayuga power plant (8 yr of CO2 output, with a range of 3–12 yr), although many uncertainties must be better constrained to obtain a more accurate estimate. Because the Queenston Formation near the Cayuga power plant is relatively homogeneous, most of the formation at this location offers the potential for CO2 storage in its pore space.","PeriodicalId":11706,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1306/EG.05191010005","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1306/EG.05191010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

We evaluated the pore volume available for a specific potential geologic carbon dioxide (CO2) storage site in the Upper Ordovician Queenston Formation near the AES Corporation Cayuga coal-fired power plant in Tompkins County, New York. Core data collected 25 mi (40 km) from the plant reveal that the Queenston Formation is a relatively homogeneous fine- to medium-grained sandstone with hematite cement. Seismic and core data indicate that the formation was deposited in a fluvial system with mobile channels and has thickness maxima that trend north-northwest. Porosity is a major factor affecting geologic CO2 storage potential, and it is important to understand discrepancies among porosity measured from core plug, neutron porosity, density-derived porosity, and thin-section point count values. Relative to core plug–derived porosity values, the neutron porosity log is more reliable than the electron density porosity values. Thin sections reveal that hematite cement is the primary factor affecting porosity variability. Seismic, core, and well-log data suggest that in a 25-mi2 (65-km2) area surrounding this power plant, the Queenston Formation can sequester 18 million metric tons (11 million metric tons) of CO2 emission from the Cayuga power plant (8 yr of CO2 output, with a range of 3–12 yr), although many uncertainties must be better constrained to obtain a more accurate estimate. Because the Queenston Formation near the Cayuga power plant is relatively homogeneous, most of the formation at this location offers the potential for CO2 storage in its pore space.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纽约州汤普金斯县AES卡尤加燃煤电厂附近昆斯顿地层的二氧化碳储存潜力
在纽约州汤普金斯县AES公司Cayuga燃煤电厂附近的上奥陶世Queenston组,我们评估了一个特定的潜在地质二氧化碳(CO2)储存地点的孔隙体积。从工厂25英里(40公里)处收集的岩心数据显示,Queenston组是一种相对均匀的细至中粒砂岩,含有赤铁矿胶结。地震和岩心资料表明,该组沉积于具有活动通道的河流体系中,厚度最大值为北西北走向。孔隙度是影响地质CO2储存潜力的主要因素,了解岩心塞、中子孔隙度、密度衍生孔隙度和薄剖面点计数值测量的孔隙度差异非常重要。相对于岩心plug-derived孔隙度值,中子孔隙度测井比电子密度孔隙度值更可靠。薄片显示赤铁矿胶结是影响孔隙度变异性的主要因素。地震、岩心和测井数据表明,在该发电厂周围25平方英里(65平方公里)的区域内,Queenston地层可以吸收来自Cayuga发电厂的1800万吨(1100万吨)二氧化碳排放(8年的二氧化碳排放量,范围为3-12年),尽管必须更好地约束许多不确定性才能获得更准确的估计。由于Cayuga发电厂附近的Queenston组相对均匀,因此该位置的大多数地层在其孔隙空间中提供了储存二氧化碳的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Geosciences
Environmental Geosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seismic criteria and structural styles for half graben differential inversion: Implication for hydrocarbon accumulation, Abu Sennan blocks, Western Desert, Egypt Evidence of hydrothermal alteration in Devonian shales from the Eastern Gas Shales Project 2 core of the Rome trough, Appalachian Basin, United States The Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership petroleum fields database: Compilation, utilization, and support for CCUS activities Presence of hydrocarbons on Mars: A possibility Potential for carbon sequestration in the Hemlock Formation of the Cook Inlet basin, Alaska
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1