Analysis of potential cost reductions related to falls in hospitalized elderly patients by correcting high‐dose prescriptions of sedative hypnotics

T. Tachi, T. Yokoi, C. Goto, M. Umeda, M. Yasuda, T. Mizui, Y. Noguchi, H. Teramachi
{"title":"Analysis of potential cost reductions related to falls in hospitalized elderly patients by correcting high‐dose prescriptions of sedative hypnotics","authors":"T. Tachi, T. Yokoi, C. Goto, M. Umeda, M. Yasuda, T. Mizui, Y. Noguchi, H. Teramachi","doi":"10.12715/har.2015.4.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Risk factors for falls include older age, diseases, and certain medications. High‐dose sedative hypnotics have been shown to increase the risk of falls, necessitating caution when these medications are used. High‐dose sedative hypnotics have an increased half‐life in elderly patients with reduced hepatic and renal function, which may increase fall risk. Methods: This retrospective survey evaluated the potential cost reductions associated with fall prevention by changing high‐dose prescriptions. For this purpose, the association between falls and high‐dose usage of sedative hypnotics was analyzed in hospitalized elderly patients. Study participants were 267 ambulatory patients aged ≥65 years who were taking sedative hypnotics and were hospitalized for ≥3 days from May 2012 to April 2013 at the Gifu Municipal Hospital, Japan. Patients' age, sex and usage of sedative hypnotics (high‐dose vs. non‐highdose) were analyzed, as well as the costs incurred by tests, drugs, and wages for medical personnel for patients on high‐dose sedative hypnotics who experienced falls. Results: Analysis revealed a significantly higher rate of falls in the group using high‐dose sedative hypnotics (21.4%; 14/224) compared to the non‐high‐dose group (6.3%; 9/42, p=0.004). Assessment of cost demonstrated potential savings of ¥589 per case if falls could be prevented by correcting high‐dose prescriptions. Conclusions: This study indicates that high‐dose prescriptions of sedative hypnotics may be associated with fall risk in the elderly. Correcting high‐dose prescriptions for these drugs would be beneficial not only for medical safety, but also the medical economy.","PeriodicalId":90841,"journal":{"name":"Healthy aging research","volume":"4 1","pages":"1–8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthy aging research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12715/har.2015.4.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Risk factors for falls include older age, diseases, and certain medications. High‐dose sedative hypnotics have been shown to increase the risk of falls, necessitating caution when these medications are used. High‐dose sedative hypnotics have an increased half‐life in elderly patients with reduced hepatic and renal function, which may increase fall risk. Methods: This retrospective survey evaluated the potential cost reductions associated with fall prevention by changing high‐dose prescriptions. For this purpose, the association between falls and high‐dose usage of sedative hypnotics was analyzed in hospitalized elderly patients. Study participants were 267 ambulatory patients aged ≥65 years who were taking sedative hypnotics and were hospitalized for ≥3 days from May 2012 to April 2013 at the Gifu Municipal Hospital, Japan. Patients' age, sex and usage of sedative hypnotics (high‐dose vs. non‐highdose) were analyzed, as well as the costs incurred by tests, drugs, and wages for medical personnel for patients on high‐dose sedative hypnotics who experienced falls. Results: Analysis revealed a significantly higher rate of falls in the group using high‐dose sedative hypnotics (21.4%; 14/224) compared to the non‐high‐dose group (6.3%; 9/42, p=0.004). Assessment of cost demonstrated potential savings of ¥589 per case if falls could be prevented by correcting high‐dose prescriptions. Conclusions: This study indicates that high‐dose prescriptions of sedative hypnotics may be associated with fall risk in the elderly. Correcting high‐dose prescriptions for these drugs would be beneficial not only for medical safety, but also the medical economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过纠正高剂量镇静催眠药处方,分析住院老年患者跌倒相关的潜在成本降低
背景:跌倒的危险因素包括年龄、疾病和某些药物。高剂量镇静催眠药已被证明会增加跌倒的风险,因此在使用这些药物时必须谨慎。大剂量镇静催眠药对肝肾功能减退的老年患者有较长的半衰期,这可能会增加跌倒的风险。方法:本回顾性调查评估了通过改变高剂量处方预防跌倒相关的潜在成本降低。为此,我们分析了住院老年患者跌倒与高剂量镇静催眠药使用之间的关系。研究对象为267名年龄≥65岁、服用镇静催眠药且2012年5月至2013年4月在日本岐阜市医院住院≥3天的门诊患者。分析了患者的年龄、性别和镇静催眠药的使用情况(高剂量与非高剂量),以及使用高剂量镇静催眠药的患者发生跌倒的检查费用、药物费用和医务人员的工资。结果:分析显示,使用高剂量镇静催眠药组的跌倒率明显更高(21.4%;14/224)与非高剂量组相比(6.3%;9/42, p = 0.004)。成本评估表明,如果纠正高剂量处方可以防止跌倒,每例可能节省589日元。结论:本研究表明,大剂量镇静催眠药处方可能与老年人跌倒风险相关。纠正这些药物的高剂量处方不仅有利于医疗安全,而且有利于医疗经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the effect of entonox gas and aromatherapy with lavender on the severity of labor pain Life without professional work-perceptions about one’s self, interpersonal relations and social life after retirement Prevalence of obesity and overweight among office workers of pars special economic energy zone, Assaluyeh, Iran Predictive value of SYNTAX score on in-hospital outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Study of Cardiovascular Factors, Quality of Life and Body Composition in Physically Active and Sedentary Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1