Insights from system leaders about operationalising a knowledge translation department in the Oman Ministry of Health

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evidence & Policy Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1332/174426421X16123709152129
S. M. Sabahi, Michael G. Wilson, J. Lavis, F. El-Jardali, Kaelan A. Moat
{"title":"Insights from system leaders about operationalising a knowledge translation department in the Oman Ministry of Health","authors":"S. M. Sabahi, Michael G. Wilson, J. Lavis, F. El-Jardali, Kaelan A. Moat","doi":"10.1332/174426421X16123709152129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Oman has prioritised enhanced efforts for supporting evidence-informed policymaking (EIPM), including establishing a knowledge translation department in the Omani Ministry of Health (MOH).Aim and objective: Our aim was to gather insights to guide the process of activating this department.Methods: We conducted a document review and in-depth, semi-structured interviews with policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders who are familiar with the Omani system.Findings: We conducted 17 interviews, which highlighted that policymakers in Oman use multiple sources of data and evidence to inform policymaking about health systems. However, several challenges to using evidence were identified, including low quality and limited availability of local evidence, system fragmentation, low interest in research, and lack of skills, capacity and time for finding, synthesising and using research evidence. Five possible activities for the department were refined with participants: building capacity, finding evidence, sparking action, embedding supports, and evaluating innovations. Participants viewed each of these activities as equally important and they should be pursued simultaneously. However, when asked to rank the most important option, participants identified capacity building as the most important to enable cultural changes needed within the MOH.Discussion and conclusions: This study provides insights for activating the knowledge translation department in the Omani MOH. Fully operationalising the department will require convening a codesign process to reach consensus on the scope of the activities undertaken by the department. Implementation will also require capitalising on the relevant experience of highly qualified staff and existing infrastructure as well as continuing to foster a supportive climate for EIPM.Key messagesA systematic and transparent approach is important for Oman to support evidence-informed policymaking;Enhancing the quality and quantity of local evidence is essential to support evidence-informed policymaking;Building capacity and ensuring sustainability are a priority when establishing a policy support organisation.","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16123709152129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Oman has prioritised enhanced efforts for supporting evidence-informed policymaking (EIPM), including establishing a knowledge translation department in the Omani Ministry of Health (MOH).Aim and objective: Our aim was to gather insights to guide the process of activating this department.Methods: We conducted a document review and in-depth, semi-structured interviews with policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders who are familiar with the Omani system.Findings: We conducted 17 interviews, which highlighted that policymakers in Oman use multiple sources of data and evidence to inform policymaking about health systems. However, several challenges to using evidence were identified, including low quality and limited availability of local evidence, system fragmentation, low interest in research, and lack of skills, capacity and time for finding, synthesising and using research evidence. Five possible activities for the department were refined with participants: building capacity, finding evidence, sparking action, embedding supports, and evaluating innovations. Participants viewed each of these activities as equally important and they should be pursued simultaneously. However, when asked to rank the most important option, participants identified capacity building as the most important to enable cultural changes needed within the MOH.Discussion and conclusions: This study provides insights for activating the knowledge translation department in the Omani MOH. Fully operationalising the department will require convening a codesign process to reach consensus on the scope of the activities undertaken by the department. Implementation will also require capitalising on the relevant experience of highly qualified staff and existing infrastructure as well as continuing to foster a supportive climate for EIPM.Key messagesA systematic and transparent approach is important for Oman to support evidence-informed policymaking;Enhancing the quality and quantity of local evidence is essential to support evidence-informed policymaking;Building capacity and ensuring sustainability are a priority when establishing a policy support organisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自系统领导人关于阿曼卫生部知识翻译部门运作的见解
背景:阿曼已优先加强支持循证决策(EIPM)的工作,包括在阿曼卫生部(MOH)建立一个知识翻译司。目标和目标:我们的目标是收集见解,以指导激活该部门的过程。方法:我们对文件进行了回顾,并对熟悉阿曼制度的政策制定者、研究人员和利益相关者进行了深入的半结构化访谈。研究结果:我们进行了17次访谈,这些访谈强调了阿曼的政策制定者使用多种来源的数据和证据来为卫生系统的决策提供信息。然而,确定了使用证据的几个挑战,包括当地证据的质量低和可得性有限、系统碎片化、对研究的兴趣低,以及缺乏寻找、综合和使用研究证据的技能、能力和时间。与会人员对该部门可能开展的五项活动进行了细化:能力建设、寻找证据、激发行动、提供支持和评估创新。与会者认为这些活动都同样重要,应同时进行。然而,当被要求对最重要的选项进行排名时,参与者认为能力建设对于实现卫生部所需的文化变革是最重要的。讨论与结论:本研究为阿曼卫生部知识翻译部门的激活提供了启示。要使该部门全面运作,就需要召开共同设计程序,就该部门开展的活动范围达成共识。实施还需要利用高素质工作人员的相关经验和现有基础设施,并继续为环境影响管理营造支持性气氛。关键信息:系统和透明的方法对阿曼支持循证决策非常重要;提高当地证据的质量和数量对于支持循证决策至关重要;建设能力和确保可持续性是建立政策支持组织的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Breaking the Overton Window: on the need for adversarial co-production Examining research systems and models for local government: a systematic review Experiences and perceptions of evidence use among senior health service decision makers in Ireland: a qualitative study The critical factors in producing high quality and policy-relevant research: insights from international behavioural science units Understanding brokers, intermediaries, and boundary spanners: a multi-sectoral review of strategies, skills, and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1