Improving research impact: lessons from the infrastructure engagement excellence standards

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evidence & Policy Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1332/174426421x16225315303512
Kirsty Jones, S. Bice
{"title":"Improving research impact: lessons from the infrastructure engagement excellence standards","authors":"Kirsty Jones, S. Bice","doi":"10.1332/174426421x16225315303512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The gap between research and practical implementation remains a major challenge for policymakers. Research co-creation, involving researchers co-designing and co-producing research with industry, government and civil society, can support improved end user uptake and better research implementation.Aims and objectives: This Practice Paper introduces a process of research co-creation based in implementation science and integrated knowledge translation theories. It details the development of the Infrastructure Engagement Excellence Standards (IEE), a framework of 10 Standards defining the qualities of community engagement for optimal infrastructure planning and delivery. The paper details a research co-creation process applicable across a variety of industries and policy settings.Key conclusions: The Practice Paper introduces a theory-based method for research co-production and discusses strengths and weaknesses of the co-creation approach used to develop the IEE Standards. Implementation science and integrated knowledge translation theory offer important insights to support more successful research co-design and co-production. Research that incorporates these theories is better positioned to achieve implementation. The creation of the IEE Standards offers one helpful example of how researchers, policymakers and practitioners can begin to close the research-implementation gap.Key messagesResearch co-creation, using implementation science and integrated knowledge translation, supports uptake of research outcomes;Co-design creates ownership and understanding of research findings among participants;Ownership of research findings improves research use, to inform policy and practice;Involving end users in all research stages makes results more applicable and meets practice needs.","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421x16225315303512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The gap between research and practical implementation remains a major challenge for policymakers. Research co-creation, involving researchers co-designing and co-producing research with industry, government and civil society, can support improved end user uptake and better research implementation.Aims and objectives: This Practice Paper introduces a process of research co-creation based in implementation science and integrated knowledge translation theories. It details the development of the Infrastructure Engagement Excellence Standards (IEE), a framework of 10 Standards defining the qualities of community engagement for optimal infrastructure planning and delivery. The paper details a research co-creation process applicable across a variety of industries and policy settings.Key conclusions: The Practice Paper introduces a theory-based method for research co-production and discusses strengths and weaknesses of the co-creation approach used to develop the IEE Standards. Implementation science and integrated knowledge translation theory offer important insights to support more successful research co-design and co-production. Research that incorporates these theories is better positioned to achieve implementation. The creation of the IEE Standards offers one helpful example of how researchers, policymakers and practitioners can begin to close the research-implementation gap.Key messagesResearch co-creation, using implementation science and integrated knowledge translation, supports uptake of research outcomes;Co-design creates ownership and understanding of research findings among participants;Ownership of research findings improves research use, to inform policy and practice;Involving end users in all research stages makes results more applicable and meets practice needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高研究影响:来自基础设施参与卓越标准的经验教训
背景:研究与实际实施之间的差距仍然是政策制定者面临的主要挑战。研究共同创造,包括研究人员与工业界、政府和民间社会共同设计和共同生产研究,可以支持改善最终用户的吸收和更好的研究实施。目的和目的:本实践论文介绍了基于实施学和整合知识翻译理论的研究共同创造过程。它详细介绍了基础设施参与卓越标准(IEE)的制定,这是一个由10个标准组成的框架,定义了社区参与的质量,以实现最佳的基础设施规划和交付。本文详细介绍了一个适用于各种行业和政策设置的研究共同创造过程。关键结论:实践文件介绍了一种基于理论的研究合作生产方法,并讨论了用于开发IEE标准的共同创造方法的优缺点。实施科学和整合知识翻译理论为支持更成功的研究、协同设计和协同生产提供了重要的见解。结合这些理论的研究更有利于实现实施。IEE标准的创建提供了一个有用的例子,说明研究人员、政策制定者和实践者如何能够开始缩小研究与实施之间的差距。研究共同创造,利用实施科学和整合的知识转化,支持研究成果的吸收;共同设计在参与者之间创造了对研究成果的所有权和理解;研究成果的所有权改善了研究的使用,为政策和实践提供信息;让最终用户参与所有研究阶段,使结果更适用并满足实践需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Breaking the Overton Window: on the need for adversarial co-production Examining research systems and models for local government: a systematic review Experiences and perceptions of evidence use among senior health service decision makers in Ireland: a qualitative study The critical factors in producing high quality and policy-relevant research: insights from international behavioural science units Understanding brokers, intermediaries, and boundary spanners: a multi-sectoral review of strategies, skills, and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1