A framework to support the design and cultivation of embedded research initiatives

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evidence & Policy Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1332/174426421X16165177707227
Vicky Ward, T. Tooman, Benet Reid, H. Davies, Breid O’ Brien, Liz Mear, M. Marshall
{"title":"A framework to support the design and cultivation of embedded research initiatives","authors":"Vicky Ward, T. Tooman, Benet Reid, H. Davies, Breid O’ Brien, Liz Mear, M. Marshall","doi":"10.1332/174426421X16165177707227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Embedded research involves co-locating researchers within non-academic organisations to better link research and practice. Embedded research initiatives are often complex and emergent with a range of underlying intents, structures and processes. This can create tensions within initiatives and contributes to ongoing uncertainty about the most suitable designs and the effectiveness of different approaches.Aims and objectives: We aimed to devise a practical framework to support those designing and cultivating embedded research by operationalising findings from an extensive study of existing initiatives.Key conclusions: The underpinning research on embedded initiatives – a literature review and scoping exercise of initiatives in health settings across the UK – showed that such initiatives share ten common sets of concerns in relation to their intent, structure and processes. We used these insights during a co-production workshop with embedded researchers and their managers that made use of a range of creative activities.The workshop resulted in a practical framework (and associated web-based tools) that draw on the metaphor of a garden to represent the growing, emergent nature of embedded research initiatives and the active work which individuals and organisations need to put into planning and maintaining such initiatives. Each of the aspects is represented as a separate area within the garden using relevant visual metaphors. Building on this, we also present a series of reflective questions designed to facilitate discussion and debate about design features, and we link these to the wider literature, thereby helping those involved to articulate and discuss their preferences and expectations.Key messagesEmbedded research initiatives are becoming increasingly popular across public sector organisations;There are many choices to be made when designing an embedded research initiative, and fresh challenges and tensions emerge as initiatives unfold;We present a structured, multilayered framework to support those designing, analysing and managing embedded research initiatives;The framework can support transparency, dialogue, agreement of expectations and ongoing learning within and between initiatives.","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16165177707227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Embedded research involves co-locating researchers within non-academic organisations to better link research and practice. Embedded research initiatives are often complex and emergent with a range of underlying intents, structures and processes. This can create tensions within initiatives and contributes to ongoing uncertainty about the most suitable designs and the effectiveness of different approaches.Aims and objectives: We aimed to devise a practical framework to support those designing and cultivating embedded research by operationalising findings from an extensive study of existing initiatives.Key conclusions: The underpinning research on embedded initiatives – a literature review and scoping exercise of initiatives in health settings across the UK – showed that such initiatives share ten common sets of concerns in relation to their intent, structure and processes. We used these insights during a co-production workshop with embedded researchers and their managers that made use of a range of creative activities.The workshop resulted in a practical framework (and associated web-based tools) that draw on the metaphor of a garden to represent the growing, emergent nature of embedded research initiatives and the active work which individuals and organisations need to put into planning and maintaining such initiatives. Each of the aspects is represented as a separate area within the garden using relevant visual metaphors. Building on this, we also present a series of reflective questions designed to facilitate discussion and debate about design features, and we link these to the wider literature, thereby helping those involved to articulate and discuss their preferences and expectations.Key messagesEmbedded research initiatives are becoming increasingly popular across public sector organisations;There are many choices to be made when designing an embedded research initiative, and fresh challenges and tensions emerge as initiatives unfold;We present a structured, multilayered framework to support those designing, analysing and managing embedded research initiatives;The framework can support transparency, dialogue, agreement of expectations and ongoing learning within and between initiatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持嵌入式研究计划的设计和培养的框架
背景:嵌入式研究涉及将研究人员安置在非学术组织中,以更好地将研究与实践联系起来。嵌入式研究计划通常是复杂和紧急的,具有一系列潜在的意图、结构和过程。这可能会在项目内部造成紧张,并导致对最合适的设计和不同方法的有效性的持续不确定性。目的和目标:我们旨在设计一个实用的框架,通过对现有倡议的广泛研究的操作结果来支持那些设计和培养嵌入式研究。关键结论:关于嵌入式倡议的基础研究——对英国各地卫生机构的倡议进行了文献回顾和范围界定——表明,这些倡议在其意图、结构和过程方面有十组共同的关注点。我们在与嵌入式研究人员及其管理人员的联合生产研讨会上使用了这些见解,该研讨会利用了一系列创造性活动。研讨会产生了一个实用的框架(以及相关的基于网络的工具),该框架利用花园的比喻来代表嵌入式研究计划的不断发展和涌现的本质,以及个人和组织需要投入到计划和维护这些计划中的积极工作。使用相关的视觉隐喻,每个方面都被表示为花园中的一个独立区域。在此基础上,我们还提出了一系列反思性问题,旨在促进对设计特征的讨论和辩论,并将这些问题与更广泛的文献联系起来,从而帮助参与者阐明和讨论他们的偏好和期望。嵌入式研究计划在公共部门组织中越来越受欢迎;在设计嵌入式研究计划时需要做出许多选择,随着计划的展开,新的挑战和紧张局势也会出现;我们提出了一个结构化的多层框架,以支持那些设计、分析和管理嵌入式研究计划的人;在项目内部和项目之间达成期望和持续学习的协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Breaking the Overton Window: on the need for adversarial co-production Examining research systems and models for local government: a systematic review Experiences and perceptions of evidence use among senior health service decision makers in Ireland: a qualitative study The critical factors in producing high quality and policy-relevant research: insights from international behavioural science units Understanding brokers, intermediaries, and boundary spanners: a multi-sectoral review of strategies, skills, and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1