The killing and thereafter: intimate partner homicides in a process perspective, part II

IF 1.7 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Gender-Based Violence Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1332/239868021x16317122802413
Viveka Enander, G. Krantz, S. Lövestad, K. Örmon
{"title":"The killing and thereafter: intimate partner homicides in a process perspective, part II","authors":"Viveka Enander, G. Krantz, S. Lövestad, K. Örmon","doi":"10.1332/239868021x16317122802413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article puts intimate partner homicide (IPH) into a process perspective, and describes the latter two stages of the IPH process, that is, ‘changing the project’ and ‘the aftermath’. The focus of analysis is on the moment when the perpetrator chooses to kill the victim, and what s/he does and says in the wake of the killing. Fifty court files, from cases involving 40 male and 10 female perpetrators, underwent thematic analysis. Regarding the final trigger pertaining to changing the project, some situational factors that trigger male-perpetrated IPH seem to differ from the corresponding factors in female-perpetrated IPH. Feelings of rejection and jealousy seemed to be more common as triggers to kill for men than for women, while some cases of female-perpetrated IPH were linked to self-defence in response to IPV. Moreover, as noted previously, no female perpetrators displayed possessiveness.Regarding the aftermath, after the homicide the perpetrators generally contacted someone and admitted to having killed their partners. Only a few perpetrators denied culpability and even fewer, mainly male, perpetrators concealed their crimes and denied knowledge of them. However, even in cases where the perpetrator admitted to having killed their victims, their courtroom narratives were apparently constructed to minimise resposibility.Key MessagesThe IPH process can be described as threefold, consisting of the following stages: the build-up before the killing, changing the project into killing one’s partner and the aftermath to the killing. Similar triggers exist in the first two stages, and the boundaries between them are blurred, but a final trigger seems to precede the killing.IPH perpetrators may contact someone after the killing and admit to having committed it, but still attempt to minimise their responsibility.The IPH process is gendered, with different features in the respective cases of male and female perpetrators. It is often, but not always, preceded by male-to-female intimate partner violence (IPV).","PeriodicalId":42166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021x16317122802413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article puts intimate partner homicide (IPH) into a process perspective, and describes the latter two stages of the IPH process, that is, ‘changing the project’ and ‘the aftermath’. The focus of analysis is on the moment when the perpetrator chooses to kill the victim, and what s/he does and says in the wake of the killing. Fifty court files, from cases involving 40 male and 10 female perpetrators, underwent thematic analysis. Regarding the final trigger pertaining to changing the project, some situational factors that trigger male-perpetrated IPH seem to differ from the corresponding factors in female-perpetrated IPH. Feelings of rejection and jealousy seemed to be more common as triggers to kill for men than for women, while some cases of female-perpetrated IPH were linked to self-defence in response to IPV. Moreover, as noted previously, no female perpetrators displayed possessiveness.Regarding the aftermath, after the homicide the perpetrators generally contacted someone and admitted to having killed their partners. Only a few perpetrators denied culpability and even fewer, mainly male, perpetrators concealed their crimes and denied knowledge of them. However, even in cases where the perpetrator admitted to having killed their victims, their courtroom narratives were apparently constructed to minimise resposibility.Key MessagesThe IPH process can be described as threefold, consisting of the following stages: the build-up before the killing, changing the project into killing one’s partner and the aftermath to the killing. Similar triggers exist in the first two stages, and the boundaries between them are blurred, but a final trigger seems to precede the killing.IPH perpetrators may contact someone after the killing and admit to having committed it, but still attempt to minimise their responsibility.The IPH process is gendered, with different features in the respective cases of male and female perpetrators. It is often, but not always, preceded by male-to-female intimate partner violence (IPV).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杀人及其后:过程视角下的亲密伴侣杀人,第二部分
本文将亲密伴侣杀人(IPH)纳入一个过程视角,并描述了IPH过程的后两个阶段,即“改变项目”和“后果”。分析的重点是犯罪者选择杀死受害者的那一刻,以及他/她在杀戮之后的所作所为。对涉及40名男性犯罪者和10名女性犯罪者的案件的50份法庭档案进行了专题分析。关于改变项目的最终触发因素,一些触发男性IPH的情境因素似乎与女性IPH的相应因素有所不同。被拒绝和嫉妒的感觉似乎是男性比女性更常见的杀人诱因,而一些女性实施的IPH案件与对IPV的自卫反应有关。此外,如前所述,没有女性犯罪者表现出占有欲。至于后果,在杀人后,犯罪者通常会联系某人并承认杀害了他们的伴侣。只有少数犯罪者否认有罪,甚至更少的犯罪者,主要是男性,隐瞒他们的罪行并否认知情。然而,即使在犯罪者承认杀害受害者的案件中,他们的法庭叙述显然是为了尽量减少责任。IPH过程可以分为三个阶段,包括以下阶段:杀戮前的积累、将计划转变为杀死伴侣和杀戮后的后果。类似的诱因存在于前两个阶段,它们之间的界限是模糊的,但最终的诱因似乎在杀戮之前。IPH犯罪者可能会在杀人后联系某人并承认犯下了罪行,但仍然试图将自己的责任降到最低。IPH过程是性别的,在男性和女性犯罪者的各自情况下具有不同的特征。在这之前,通常(但并非总是)会发生男性对女性的亲密伴侣暴力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
‘I’m terrified of becoming a headline’: an exhibition responding to GBV in Ireland ‘I’m terrified of becoming a headline’: an exhibition responding to GBV in Ireland Does a history with sexual assault impact bystander intervention engagement? An analysis of the risk factors for intimate partner sexual violence against women and girls in Mexico Resilience and agency in children living with domestic abuse: an alternative interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1