Evacuation and its Types – Revision of the Definition and Classification

Mariusz Stanisław Barański, Agnieszka Haznar-Barańska
{"title":"Evacuation and its Types – Revision of the Definition and Classification","authors":"Mariusz Stanisław Barański, Agnieszka Haznar-Barańska","doi":"10.12845/sft.58.2.2021.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Evacuation is a broad concept encompassing many forms of movement in the event of an emergency. Definitions of evacuation are different in many standards and publications in the field of fire safety engineering. The introduction of a unified version of the definition will allow for a precise description of this process. The diversity of its forms and types in the literature on the subject requires the introduction of an appropriate classification. This will allow for systematization of various forms of evacuation and conducting more precise research on individual types of the evacuation process. Introduction: The evacuation process takes into account the possibility of moving not only people, but also animals and property from a place of danger to a currently safe place. It is a process that does not always take place in an organized or orderly way, and its effect is to leave the place of danger by all people. The complexity of the evacuation process allows it to be divided due to various forms, ways of conducting it, or objects subject to evacuation. In the literature on the subject, many definitions of various forms of evacuation have been formed, i.e. general, phase, organized, self-evacuation, indepen- dent, rescue, primary, gradual, selective, sequential, full, preventive, partial, successful, total, successful, successful, secondary, primary, intervention, managed, directed, unmanaged, I degree, II degree, III degree, etc. Methodology: The authors reviewed the available definitions of the concept of evacuation and proposed a new definition to describe the process in more general terms. In addition, the authors conducted a review of the forms of evacuation and its classification occurring in scientific publications within the national scope. As a result of the detailed analysis, a preliminary classification of individual determinations of the evacuation process was made. Conclusions: The concept of evacuation has a much broader meaning than the current definitions of this process. The analysis shows that evacuation should be defined as a process of moving people, animals or property from a place of danger to a place currently safe. For the purposes of this article, a total of more than 25 evacuation process determinations have been identified, which have been classified into 12 categories. Progress in many areas, i.e. construction, development of transport and urban infrastructure and the occurrence of public demonstrations/events, affects the need to verify existing definitions for the needs of new conditions. The publication aims to draw attention to the need to introduce a systematic analysis of the classification of the evacuation process. Such classification will allow for the proper identification of all kinds of variables that have different effects on different forms of this process. The introduction of such a division will allow the use of appropriate measures, tools and procedures to ensure an adequate level of human safety. The carried out categorization may be the basis for identifying the risks that may occur during individual forms of evacuation. Keywords: evacuation, evacuation definition, types of evacuation, fire safety Type of article: review article","PeriodicalId":34374,"journal":{"name":"Safety Fire Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12845/sft.58.2.2021.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Evacuation is a broad concept encompassing many forms of movement in the event of an emergency. Definitions of evacuation are different in many standards and publications in the field of fire safety engineering. The introduction of a unified version of the definition will allow for a precise description of this process. The diversity of its forms and types in the literature on the subject requires the introduction of an appropriate classification. This will allow for systematization of various forms of evacuation and conducting more precise research on individual types of the evacuation process. Introduction: The evacuation process takes into account the possibility of moving not only people, but also animals and property from a place of danger to a currently safe place. It is a process that does not always take place in an organized or orderly way, and its effect is to leave the place of danger by all people. The complexity of the evacuation process allows it to be divided due to various forms, ways of conducting it, or objects subject to evacuation. In the literature on the subject, many definitions of various forms of evacuation have been formed, i.e. general, phase, organized, self-evacuation, indepen- dent, rescue, primary, gradual, selective, sequential, full, preventive, partial, successful, total, successful, successful, secondary, primary, intervention, managed, directed, unmanaged, I degree, II degree, III degree, etc. Methodology: The authors reviewed the available definitions of the concept of evacuation and proposed a new definition to describe the process in more general terms. In addition, the authors conducted a review of the forms of evacuation and its classification occurring in scientific publications within the national scope. As a result of the detailed analysis, a preliminary classification of individual determinations of the evacuation process was made. Conclusions: The concept of evacuation has a much broader meaning than the current definitions of this process. The analysis shows that evacuation should be defined as a process of moving people, animals or property from a place of danger to a place currently safe. For the purposes of this article, a total of more than 25 evacuation process determinations have been identified, which have been classified into 12 categories. Progress in many areas, i.e. construction, development of transport and urban infrastructure and the occurrence of public demonstrations/events, affects the need to verify existing definitions for the needs of new conditions. The publication aims to draw attention to the need to introduce a systematic analysis of the classification of the evacuation process. Such classification will allow for the proper identification of all kinds of variables that have different effects on different forms of this process. The introduction of such a division will allow the use of appropriate measures, tools and procedures to ensure an adequate level of human safety. The carried out categorization may be the basis for identifying the risks that may occur during individual forms of evacuation. Keywords: evacuation, evacuation definition, types of evacuation, fire safety Type of article: review article
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疏散及其类型-定义和分类的修订
目的:疏散是一个广泛的概念,包括在紧急情况下多种形式的移动。在消防安全工程领域的许多标准和出版物中,疏散的定义是不同的。该定义的统一版本的引入将允许对该过程进行精确的描述。在有关该主题的文献中,其形式和类型的多样性要求引入适当的分类。这将使各种形式的疏散工作系统化,并对个别类型的疏散过程进行更精确的研究。导读:疏散过程不仅要考虑到将人、动物和财产从危险的地方转移到目前安全的地方的可能性。这是一个并不总是以有组织或有序的方式发生的过程,其效果是所有人离开危险的地方。疏散过程的复杂性使其可以根据各种形式、进行方式或疏散对象进行划分。在这一主题的文献中,对各种形式的疏散形成了许多定义,即一般疏散、阶段疏散、有组织疏散、自我疏散、独立疏散、救援疏散、初级疏散、渐进疏散、选择性疏散、顺序疏散、全面疏散、预防性疏散、部分疏散、成功疏散、全部疏散、成功疏散、二级疏散、初级疏散、干预疏散、管理疏散、指导疏散、无管理疏散、一级、二级、三级疏散等。方法:作者审查了疏散概念的现有定义,并提出了一个新的定义,以更一般的方式描述这一过程。此外,作者还对全国范围内科学出版物中出现的疏散形式及其分类进行了审查。经过详细分析,对疏散过程的个别决定进行了初步分类。结论:疏散的概念比目前对这一过程的定义具有更广泛的含义。分析表明,疏散应该被定义为将人、动物或财产从危险的地方转移到目前安全的地方的过程。为了本条的目的,共确定了25项以上的撤离过程决定,并将其分为12类。许多领域的进展,例如建筑、运输和城市基础设施的发展以及公众示威/事件的发生,影响到为满足新条件的需要而核查现有定义的必要性。该出版物的目的是提请注意需要对疏散过程的分类进行系统分析。这种分类将允许适当地识别对这一进程的不同形式产生不同影响的各种变量。采用这种划分将允许使用适当的措施、工具和程序来确保充分的人身安全。所进行的分类可能是确定在个别形式的疏散期间可能发生的风险的基础。关键词:疏散,疏散定义,疏散类型,消防安全文章类型:综述文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Important Parameters and Settings in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Critical Infrastructure in Poland during the COVID-19 Pandemic Changes in the Requirements for Placing Construction Products for Fire Protection Marked with a Construction Mark on the Market or Making Them Available on the National Market – Update Functional and Performance Characteristics Including Principles of Placing the Elements of Voice Alarm Systems on the Market Waste in the Context of Combustibility – Classification Possibilities in Legal Terms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1