Selected Aspects of Crisis Management with the Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) on the Example of a Traffic Disaster

Wiesław Jaszczur, Szymon Łukasik
{"title":"Selected Aspects of Crisis Management with the Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) on the Example of a Traffic Disaster","authors":"Wiesław Jaszczur, Szymon Łukasik","doi":"10.12845/sft.58.2.2021.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The theoretical aim of this study was to present the impact of modern technologies on the improvement of the effectiveness of process activ- ities (documenting) at the site of a communication disaster. On the other hand, the utilitarian goal was to present the improvement of the organization of documenting a mass incident with the use of drones and photogrammetry tools. Design and methods: As part of the exercise consisting of a simulation of a communication disaster, the activities were documented using the func - tionality of unmanned aerial vehicles which interact with an IT system (Pix4D application). The characteristic drone models which can be used in the monitoring of a disaster site were presented. The discussed research approach describes the methods used to perform drone flights and to what extent the photogrammetric method of processing digital images obtained from drones was used. The issue of field measurements (control points, control lines), the purpose of which was to determine the accuracy of mapping and matching to the coordinate system, was discussed. Results: As part of the research, images were captured and taken with the use of UAVs and IT systems, which were collated and compared with the results of measurements from the visual inspection of the disaster site, performed in a traditional manner by the representatives of the procedural entity. A comparative analysis of the collected research material leading to a comparison of the work results captured by means of the traditional procedural forms with the methods and techniques of modern technologies (drone with the Pix4D Cloud application) allows for the following conclusions to be drawn. For short measuring sections (up to 15 meters), the measurement accuracy of the two methods differs by about 1.5%. For longer measuring sections (up to 100 m), the measurement error is approx. 2.3%. Conclusions: In case of the UAV method and the application Pix4D Cloud, the sources of measurement errors should be seen in the accuracy of rendering of the details of the model (the quality of imaging) and the ability to use this application. On the other hand, when using the police method, in which the measurement trolley is the measuring tool, the sources of error should be seen in the uneven terrain, the obstacles in the terrain, and the measurement error of the tool itself (the trolley). The innovation of the project to use UAVs certainly gains importance especially in a terrain with limited accessibility, i.e. in hilly and mountainous terrain, at road intersections or forks. Keywords: communication disaster, modern technologies, crisis management Article type: preliminary report","PeriodicalId":34374,"journal":{"name":"Safety Fire Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12845/sft.58.2.2021.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The theoretical aim of this study was to present the impact of modern technologies on the improvement of the effectiveness of process activ- ities (documenting) at the site of a communication disaster. On the other hand, the utilitarian goal was to present the improvement of the organization of documenting a mass incident with the use of drones and photogrammetry tools. Design and methods: As part of the exercise consisting of a simulation of a communication disaster, the activities were documented using the func - tionality of unmanned aerial vehicles which interact with an IT system (Pix4D application). The characteristic drone models which can be used in the monitoring of a disaster site were presented. The discussed research approach describes the methods used to perform drone flights and to what extent the photogrammetric method of processing digital images obtained from drones was used. The issue of field measurements (control points, control lines), the purpose of which was to determine the accuracy of mapping and matching to the coordinate system, was discussed. Results: As part of the research, images were captured and taken with the use of UAVs and IT systems, which were collated and compared with the results of measurements from the visual inspection of the disaster site, performed in a traditional manner by the representatives of the procedural entity. A comparative analysis of the collected research material leading to a comparison of the work results captured by means of the traditional procedural forms with the methods and techniques of modern technologies (drone with the Pix4D Cloud application) allows for the following conclusions to be drawn. For short measuring sections (up to 15 meters), the measurement accuracy of the two methods differs by about 1.5%. For longer measuring sections (up to 100 m), the measurement error is approx. 2.3%. Conclusions: In case of the UAV method and the application Pix4D Cloud, the sources of measurement errors should be seen in the accuracy of rendering of the details of the model (the quality of imaging) and the ability to use this application. On the other hand, when using the police method, in which the measurement trolley is the measuring tool, the sources of error should be seen in the uneven terrain, the obstacles in the terrain, and the measurement error of the tool itself (the trolley). The innovation of the project to use UAVs certainly gains importance especially in a terrain with limited accessibility, i.e. in hilly and mountainous terrain, at road intersections or forks. Keywords: communication disaster, modern technologies, crisis management Article type: preliminary report
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以交通事故为例,探讨使用无人机进行危机管理的若干方面
目的:本研究的理论目的是呈现现代技术对通讯灾难现场过程活动(文件)有效性改善的影响。另一方面,功利主义的目标是展示使用无人机和摄影测量工具记录集体事件的组织改进。设计和方法:作为模拟通信灾难的演习的一部分,使用与IT系统(Pix4D应用程序)交互的无人驾驶飞行器的功能记录了这些活动。提出了可用于灾害现场监测的特征无人机模型。所讨论的研究方法描述了用于执行无人机飞行的方法,以及在多大程度上使用了处理从无人机获得的数字图像的摄影测量方法。讨论了实地测量(控制点、控制线)的问题,其目的是确定制图和与坐标系匹配的准确性。结果:作为研究的一部分,使用无人机和IT系统捕获和拍摄了图像,并将其与由程序实体代表以传统方式进行的灾难现场目视检查的测量结果进行了整理和比较。对收集的研究材料进行比较分析,将传统程序形式与现代技术的方法和技术(具有Pix4D云应用程序的无人机)捕获的工作结果进行比较,可以得出以下结论。对于较短的测量段(不超过15米),两种方法的测量精度相差约1.5%。对于较长的测量段(高达100米),测量误差约为。2.3%。结论:在无人机方法和Pix4D Cloud应用的情况下,测量误差的来源应该是模型细节渲染的准确性(成像质量)和使用该应用的能力。另一方面,在使用以测量小车为测量工具的警务法时,应从地形不平、地形中的障碍物、工具本身(小车)的测量误差等方面来看待误差的来源。使用无人机的项目创新无疑具有重要意义,特别是在可达性有限的地形中,即丘陵和山地地形,道路十字路口或岔路口。关键词:通信灾害,现代技术,危机管理文章类型:初步报告
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Important Parameters and Settings in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Critical Infrastructure in Poland during the COVID-19 Pandemic Changes in the Requirements for Placing Construction Products for Fire Protection Marked with a Construction Mark on the Market or Making Them Available on the National Market – Update Functional and Performance Characteristics Including Principles of Placing the Elements of Voice Alarm Systems on the Market Waste in the Context of Combustibility – Classification Possibilities in Legal Terms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1