Effects of Feeding Bifidobacterium longum and Inulin on Some Gastrointestinal Indices in Human Volunteers

F. Bruno, N. Shah
{"title":"Effects of Feeding Bifidobacterium longum and Inulin on Some Gastrointestinal Indices in Human Volunteers","authors":"F. Bruno, N. Shah","doi":"10.12938/BIFIDUS.23.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interest in consumption of probiotic and prebiotics (indigestible oligosaccharides) to improve human gastrointestinal health is increasing. Consumption of beneficial probiotic bacteria combined with oligosaccharides may provide enhanced gastrointestinal benefits and improvements in internal health. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of administering Bifidobacterium longum 1941 or B. longum BB536 and inulin to healthy, adult volunteers over 2-wk to observe changes in gastrointestinal indices (bacterial counts in stool, stool defecation frequency and consistency, and in organic acids, β-glucuronidase and β-glucosidase enzyme concentration, pH and moisture). A randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled parallel group comparison was carried out. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of freeze-dried bacterial preparation containing ≥ 1 × 10 1 0 cfu/g of either B. longum 1941 and 475 mg inulin (n = 10), B. longum BB536 and 475 mg inulin (n = 10) or a placebo containing 475 mg inulin (n = 10). Efficacy was based on comparison of initial values of gastrointestinal indices with final values. No significant difference between the baseline and the final reading among the three treatment groups was observed on bacterial counts, defecation frequency, stool consistency, pH, enzyme and organic acid concentrations or moisture percentage of stools. However, levels of butyric acid increased after subjects consumed probiotic capsules. No subjects reported worsening in gastrointestinal health after consumption of probiotic capsules. These results indicate that the administration of B. longum 1941 and B. longum BB536 did not significantly alter the intestinal environment, defecation frequency and faecal characteristics of healthy, human subjects. These results were possibly due to the short duration of the study and the participation of healthy, adult populations consuming probiotic bacteria and prebiotics.","PeriodicalId":90114,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience and microflora","volume":"23 1","pages":"11-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience and microflora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12938/BIFIDUS.23.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Interest in consumption of probiotic and prebiotics (indigestible oligosaccharides) to improve human gastrointestinal health is increasing. Consumption of beneficial probiotic bacteria combined with oligosaccharides may provide enhanced gastrointestinal benefits and improvements in internal health. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of administering Bifidobacterium longum 1941 or B. longum BB536 and inulin to healthy, adult volunteers over 2-wk to observe changes in gastrointestinal indices (bacterial counts in stool, stool defecation frequency and consistency, and in organic acids, β-glucuronidase and β-glucosidase enzyme concentration, pH and moisture). A randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled parallel group comparison was carried out. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of freeze-dried bacterial preparation containing ≥ 1 × 10 1 0 cfu/g of either B. longum 1941 and 475 mg inulin (n = 10), B. longum BB536 and 475 mg inulin (n = 10) or a placebo containing 475 mg inulin (n = 10). Efficacy was based on comparison of initial values of gastrointestinal indices with final values. No significant difference between the baseline and the final reading among the three treatment groups was observed on bacterial counts, defecation frequency, stool consistency, pH, enzyme and organic acid concentrations or moisture percentage of stools. However, levels of butyric acid increased after subjects consumed probiotic capsules. No subjects reported worsening in gastrointestinal health after consumption of probiotic capsules. These results indicate that the administration of B. longum 1941 and B. longum BB536 did not significantly alter the intestinal environment, defecation frequency and faecal characteristics of healthy, human subjects. These results were possibly due to the short duration of the study and the participation of healthy, adult populations consuming probiotic bacteria and prebiotics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饲喂长双歧杆菌和菊粉对人体某些胃肠指标的影响
人们对食用益生菌和益生元(不易消化的低聚糖)来改善人类胃肠道健康的兴趣正在增加。食用有益的益生菌和低聚糖可以增强胃肠道的益处和改善内部健康。本研究的目的是评估长双歧杆菌1941或长双歧杆菌BB536和菊粉对健康成年志愿者在2周内的有效性,观察胃肠道指标的变化(粪便中的细菌计数,粪便排便频率和一致性,有机酸,β-葡萄糖苷酶和β-葡萄糖苷酶浓度,pH和水分)。进行随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的平行组比较。受试者被随机分配接受25 mg含有≥1 × 10 10 cfu/g长芽孢杆菌1941和475 mg菊粉(n = 10)、长芽孢杆菌BB536和475 mg菊粉(n = 10)的冻干细菌制剂或含有475 mg菊粉的安慰剂(n = 10)。疗效是基于胃肠道指数的初始值与最终值的比较。在三个治疗组中,在细菌计数、排便频率、粪便稠度、pH值、酶和有机酸浓度或粪便水分百分比方面,基线和最终读数之间没有显著差异。然而,服用益生菌胶囊后,丁酸水平增加。没有受试者报告服用益生菌胶囊后胃肠道健康恶化。这些结果表明,长芽孢杆菌1941和长芽孢杆菌BB536对健康人类受试者的肠道环境、排便频率和粪便特征没有显著影响。这些结果可能是由于研究持续时间短,健康的成年人参与了益生菌和益生元的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reading Attitudes in Vietnam: Initial Study of the Early School Years. Early probiotic supplementation for the prevention of atopic disease in newborns-probiotics and the hygiene hypothesis-. Metabolism of Isoflavones Found in the Pueraria thomsonii Flower by Human Intestinal Microbiota. Effects of Bifidobacterium bifidum G9-1 on Nasal Symptoms in a Guinea Pig Model of Experimental Allergic Rhinitis. Influence of Lactobacillus pentosus S-PT84 Ingestion on the Mucosal Immunity of Healthy and Salmonella Typhimurium-Infected Mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1