Influences of Lactobacillus and Cellobiose on the Composition and Metabolic Activity of Fecal Microbiota in Dogs given Boiled Chicken Head and Cow Milk

T. Fujisawa, Hideaki Asanaga, C. Ito, C. Kumagai, K. Kawasumi, H. Amao, K. Shinohara, Y. Ohashi, M. Iida, M. Murakami, H. Anzai, M. Matsunaga
{"title":"Influences of Lactobacillus and Cellobiose on the Composition and Metabolic Activity of Fecal Microbiota in Dogs given Boiled Chicken Head and Cow Milk","authors":"T. Fujisawa, Hideaki Asanaga, C. Ito, C. Kumagai, K. Kawasumi, H. Amao, K. Shinohara, Y. Ohashi, M. Iida, M. Murakami, H. Anzai, M. Matsunaga","doi":"10.12938/BIFIDUS.27.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Influences of viable or sterilized Lactobacillus and cellobiose on the fecal microbiota and fecal metabolites in dogs given boiled chicken head and cow milk were investigated. During the intake of boiled chicken head and cow milk, the number of Enterobacteriaceae (p<0.05) and the fecal pH (p<0.05) increased significantly, and the frequency of occurrence of lecithinase-negative and lecithinase-positive clostridia tended to increase in all test groups. Furthermore, fecal concentrations of sulfide increased significantly (p<0.05) or tended to increase in all test groups. Although the numbers of lactobacilli did not decrease during the intake of boiled chicken head and cow milk in the viable Lactobacillus and cellobiose intake group and sterilized Lactobacillus and cellobiose intake group, they decreased significantly (p<0.05) and bifidobacteria were not detected during the intake of boiled chicken head and cow milk in the skim milk intake group. The fecal concentrations of short chain fatty acids (acetic, butyric and propionic acids) were not changed throughout the test period in any test group. Although clinical symptoms such as fecal hardness in dogs given Lactobacillus and cellobiose were not markedly different from those of the skim milk intake group, there were no dogs which excreted only abnormal (soft, muddy to diarrhea) feces in the viable Lactobacillus administration group on day 21. These findings indicate that administration of Lactobacillus and cellobiose offered more protection against fecal microbiota disorders during the intake of boiled chicken head and cow milk than the administration of skim milk, and there is a possibility of alleviating clinical symptoms by the administration of Lactobacillus and cellobiose.","PeriodicalId":90114,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience and microflora","volume":"27 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience and microflora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12938/BIFIDUS.27.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Influences of viable or sterilized Lactobacillus and cellobiose on the fecal microbiota and fecal metabolites in dogs given boiled chicken head and cow milk were investigated. During the intake of boiled chicken head and cow milk, the number of Enterobacteriaceae (p<0.05) and the fecal pH (p<0.05) increased significantly, and the frequency of occurrence of lecithinase-negative and lecithinase-positive clostridia tended to increase in all test groups. Furthermore, fecal concentrations of sulfide increased significantly (p<0.05) or tended to increase in all test groups. Although the numbers of lactobacilli did not decrease during the intake of boiled chicken head and cow milk in the viable Lactobacillus and cellobiose intake group and sterilized Lactobacillus and cellobiose intake group, they decreased significantly (p<0.05) and bifidobacteria were not detected during the intake of boiled chicken head and cow milk in the skim milk intake group. The fecal concentrations of short chain fatty acids (acetic, butyric and propionic acids) were not changed throughout the test period in any test group. Although clinical symptoms such as fecal hardness in dogs given Lactobacillus and cellobiose were not markedly different from those of the skim milk intake group, there were no dogs which excreted only abnormal (soft, muddy to diarrhea) feces in the viable Lactobacillus administration group on day 21. These findings indicate that administration of Lactobacillus and cellobiose offered more protection against fecal microbiota disorders during the intake of boiled chicken head and cow milk than the administration of skim milk, and there is a possibility of alleviating clinical symptoms by the administration of Lactobacillus and cellobiose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳杆菌和纤维二糖对煮鸡头和牛奶饲喂犬粪便微生物组成和代谢活性的影响
研究了活菌或灭菌乳杆菌和纤维素糖对煮鸡头和牛奶喂养犬粪便微生物群和粪便代谢物的影响。在摄入水煮鸡头和牛奶期间,各试验组肠杆菌科数量(p<0.05)和粪便pH值(p<0.05)均显著升高,卵磷脂酶阴性和卵磷脂酶阳性梭菌的出现频率均有增加的趋势。各试验组粪便中硫化物浓度均显著升高或有升高趋势(p<0.05)。虽然活乳杆菌和纤维素糖摄入组和灭菌乳杆菌和纤维素糖摄入组在煮熟的鸡头和牛奶中乳酸菌数量没有减少,但脱脂乳摄入组在煮熟的鸡头和牛奶中乳酸菌数量显著减少(p<0.05),且未检出双歧杆菌。各试验组粪便中短链脂肪酸(乙酸、丁酸和丙酸)浓度在整个试验期间均无变化。虽然乳杆菌组和纤维素糖组的临床症状如粪便硬度与脱脂乳组无明显差异,但在第21天,活菌乳杆菌组没有出现狗只排出异常粪便(软、浑浊到腹泻)的情况。这些研究结果表明,在食用煮熟的鸡头和牛奶时,乳杆菌和纤维素糖比脱脂牛奶更能预防粪便微生物群紊乱,并且有可能通过乳杆菌和纤维素糖缓解临床症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reading Attitudes in Vietnam: Initial Study of the Early School Years. Early probiotic supplementation for the prevention of atopic disease in newborns-probiotics and the hygiene hypothesis-. Metabolism of Isoflavones Found in the Pueraria thomsonii Flower by Human Intestinal Microbiota. Effects of Bifidobacterium bifidum G9-1 on Nasal Symptoms in a Guinea Pig Model of Experimental Allergic Rhinitis. Influence of Lactobacillus pentosus S-PT84 Ingestion on the Mucosal Immunity of Healthy and Salmonella Typhimurium-Infected Mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1