El Renacimiento y la otra España. Visión Cultural Socioespiritual by José C. Nieto (review)

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY CATHOLIC HISTORICAL REVIEW Pub Date : 1998-10-01 DOI:10.1353/CAT.1998.0226
A. Wright
{"title":"El Renacimiento y la otra España. Visión Cultural Socioespiritual by José C. Nieto (review)","authors":"A. Wright","doi":"10.1353/CAT.1998.0226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"El Renacimiento y la otra Espana Visi6n Cultural Soctoespiritual. By Jose C. Nieto. [Travaux d'Humanisme et Renaissance, No. CCCXV] (Geneva: Librairie Droz, S.A. 1997. Pp. 855.) In the last few decades, and continuing into the most recent years, the ambiguous and contested religious beliefs of such sixteenth-century figures as Contarini, Pole, Morone, and Carranza have been newly investigated by Spanish, Italian, British, and American scholars. From such research it has at least become clear how genuinely perplexing and dangerously uncertain were the precise bounds of Catholic orthodoxy in that century until the early stages of the Council of Trent in the mid-1540's. In the consequently difficult task of identifying the beliefs held at precise dates by such figures, the example of Juan de Valdes, who moved from Spain to Italy, has naturally emerged as important, and in understanding him scholars have been able to draw on the monograph, of 1970, by Jose Nieto. Furthermore, the last few decades have also seen a transformation of scholarly knowledge of the Spanish Inquisition, thanks to excellent, detailed studies by Spanish and other historians. A volume as vast as the one considered here might therefore be expected to prove of great value, as a contribution to the historical debate which continues about the range of religious beliefs in both Spain and Italy in the sixteenth century. Sadly, despite a considerable number of stimulating suggestions and observations in this monumental work, it proves to make little contact with that debate. Indeed, the terms of the debate seem to be virtually ignored, despite some reference in passing to relevant work on Pole and Carranza, though not Morone or Contarini. Nor does there appear to be any recognition of the extensive new research, much of it written in Spanish, on the Spanish Inquisition. Moreover, in all this vast number of pages no archival references would seem to be included as the result of the author's own researches, the few that do feature being apparently cited via the secondary literature. That secondary reading itself, in the extensive footnotes as opposed to the concluding bibliography, presents an extraordinarily dated picture, not only with regard to the Spanish Inquisition, for example, but also with reference to biblical scholarship for instance, despite references to twentiethcentury Catholic liberation theology. It is also alarming that, at least for events in sixteenth-century Europe outside Spain or involving more than Spain itself, amazing assertions have been left uncorrected, which cannot simply be errors of printing or proof-reading, such as the attribution of eight wives to Henry VIII or the statement that no English Catholics took refuge in Spain. …","PeriodicalId":44384,"journal":{"name":"CATHOLIC HISTORICAL REVIEW","volume":"35 1","pages":"762 - 764"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/CAT.1998.0226","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CATHOLIC HISTORICAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/CAT.1998.0226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

El Renacimiento y la otra Espana Visi6n Cultural Soctoespiritual. By Jose C. Nieto. [Travaux d'Humanisme et Renaissance, No. CCCXV] (Geneva: Librairie Droz, S.A. 1997. Pp. 855.) In the last few decades, and continuing into the most recent years, the ambiguous and contested religious beliefs of such sixteenth-century figures as Contarini, Pole, Morone, and Carranza have been newly investigated by Spanish, Italian, British, and American scholars. From such research it has at least become clear how genuinely perplexing and dangerously uncertain were the precise bounds of Catholic orthodoxy in that century until the early stages of the Council of Trent in the mid-1540's. In the consequently difficult task of identifying the beliefs held at precise dates by such figures, the example of Juan de Valdes, who moved from Spain to Italy, has naturally emerged as important, and in understanding him scholars have been able to draw on the monograph, of 1970, by Jose Nieto. Furthermore, the last few decades have also seen a transformation of scholarly knowledge of the Spanish Inquisition, thanks to excellent, detailed studies by Spanish and other historians. A volume as vast as the one considered here might therefore be expected to prove of great value, as a contribution to the historical debate which continues about the range of religious beliefs in both Spain and Italy in the sixteenth century. Sadly, despite a considerable number of stimulating suggestions and observations in this monumental work, it proves to make little contact with that debate. Indeed, the terms of the debate seem to be virtually ignored, despite some reference in passing to relevant work on Pole and Carranza, though not Morone or Contarini. Nor does there appear to be any recognition of the extensive new research, much of it written in Spanish, on the Spanish Inquisition. Moreover, in all this vast number of pages no archival references would seem to be included as the result of the author's own researches, the few that do feature being apparently cited via the secondary literature. That secondary reading itself, in the extensive footnotes as opposed to the concluding bibliography, presents an extraordinarily dated picture, not only with regard to the Spanish Inquisition, for example, but also with reference to biblical scholarship for instance, despite references to twentiethcentury Catholic liberation theology. It is also alarming that, at least for events in sixteenth-century Europe outside Spain or involving more than Spain itself, amazing assertions have been left uncorrected, which cannot simply be errors of printing or proof-reading, such as the attribution of eight wives to Henry VIII or the statement that no English Catholics took refuge in Spain. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文艺复兴和另一个西班牙。jose C. Nieto的社会精神文化愿景(回顾)
El Renacimiento与la otra西班牙视觉文化社会精神。何塞·c·涅托著。[Travaux d'Humanisme and Renaissance, No. 5]日内瓦:德罗兹图书馆,1997。855页。)在过去的几十年里,并一直持续到最近几年,西班牙、意大利、英国和美国的学者对康塔里尼、波尔、莫罗内和卡兰萨等16世纪人物的模棱两可和有争议的宗教信仰进行了新的研究。从这些研究中,我们至少可以清楚地看到,直到1540年代中期天特会议的早期阶段,天主教正统的确切界限在那个世纪是多么令人困惑和危险的不确定。因此,在确定这些人物在精确日期所持有的信仰这一艰巨任务中,从西班牙移居意大利的胡安·德·巴尔德斯(Juan de Valdes)的例子自然变得重要起来,为了理解他,学者们能够借鉴何塞·涅托(Jose Nieto) 1970年的专著。此外,在过去的几十年里,由于西班牙和其他历史学家出色而详细的研究,西班牙宗教裁判所的学术知识也发生了转变。因此,像这里所讨论的这么大的一卷书可能会被证明具有巨大的价值,作为对16世纪西班牙和意大利宗教信仰范围的历史辩论的贡献。可悲的是,尽管在这部巨著中有相当多的令人振奋的建议和观察,但事实证明,它与那场辩论几乎没有联系。事实上,这场辩论的内容似乎几乎被忽略了,尽管有人顺便提到了关于波尔和卡兰萨的相关研究,但没有提到莫罗内或康塔里尼。似乎也没有任何承认广泛的新研究,其中大部分是用西班牙语写的,关于西班牙宗教裁判所。此外,在所有这些大量的页面中,没有档案参考文献似乎是作者自己研究的结果,少数的参考文献显然是通过二手文献引用的。次级阅读本身,在大量的脚注中,而不是最后的参考书目中,呈现出一幅非常过时的画面,不仅是关于西班牙宗教裁判所,比如,还有关于圣经的学术研究,比如,尽管提到了二十世纪的天主教解放神学。同样令人担忧的是,至少在16世纪欧洲发生的西班牙以外的事件或涉及西班牙以外的事件中,有一些惊人的断言没有得到纠正,这些断言不能简单地说是印刷或校对的错误,比如亨利八世有八个妻子,或者没有英国天主教徒在西班牙避难的说法。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Periodical Literature Notes and Comments Obituary Ecclesiastical Participation of the Catholic Laity in the Late Modern Period: The Case of Italian Immigrants in the United States Argentine Catholic Democratic Scientists and Their Projects for a Research University (1932–59)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1