Sustainable financial reporting practice in Australian companies - does quality matter?

Omar Al Farooque
{"title":"Sustainable financial reporting practice in Australian companies - does quality matter?","authors":"Omar Al Farooque","doi":"10.1353/jda.2016.0138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores whether accounting and disclosure quality have been achieved in the current reporting practice (i.e. post-IFRS period) in Australian non-financial listed companies and whether stock market is sufficiently responsive (i.e. value relevance) to quality accounting numbers. Given the role of IFRS in enhancing reporting quality, it explores whether post-2005 reporting practice sufficiently effective (i.e. sustainable) in mitigating earnings management concerns of the investors and stakeholders’ at large, as well as explaining predictive value and return under the current regulatory environment. Applying GLS regression in a full sample of 2000-2014 and sub-samples of pre-IFRS and post-IFRS adoption periods, we document that accounting quality has been improved marginally in explaining change in profitability and cash flow in post-IFRS period as compared to pre-IFRS period. However, there is no significant progress in explaining change in receivables and sales between the pre and post-IFRS periods. Despite expectation of high value relevance of accounting information in post-IFRS period, our results suggest the opposite, i.e. value relevance is either disappeared or counter active in post-IFRS period as compared to pre-IFRS period. However, significant accounting quality improvement is observed in restraining earnings management practices in post-IFRS period. Overall, the findings highlight a mix representation of accounting/disclosure quality in post-IFRS period, which suggest that accounting quality still remains as a matter of concern in delivering quality financial reporting. Our findings raise questions, in an asymmetric information environment, about long-term decision usefulness of accounting numbers and sustainable financial reporting practice in Australia. Policy makers, regulators, accounting standard setters, investors and other stakeholders should understand that for Australian companies the accounting quality journey has not fully achieved yet as per expectation even after adopting IFRS and more to be done in this direction. While some improvements are commendable, further road-map is warranted for sustainable financial reporting practices in Australian companies.","PeriodicalId":84983,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Developing Areas","volume":"50 1","pages":"175 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jda.2016.0138","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Developing Areas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2016.0138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study explores whether accounting and disclosure quality have been achieved in the current reporting practice (i.e. post-IFRS period) in Australian non-financial listed companies and whether stock market is sufficiently responsive (i.e. value relevance) to quality accounting numbers. Given the role of IFRS in enhancing reporting quality, it explores whether post-2005 reporting practice sufficiently effective (i.e. sustainable) in mitigating earnings management concerns of the investors and stakeholders’ at large, as well as explaining predictive value and return under the current regulatory environment. Applying GLS regression in a full sample of 2000-2014 and sub-samples of pre-IFRS and post-IFRS adoption periods, we document that accounting quality has been improved marginally in explaining change in profitability and cash flow in post-IFRS period as compared to pre-IFRS period. However, there is no significant progress in explaining change in receivables and sales between the pre and post-IFRS periods. Despite expectation of high value relevance of accounting information in post-IFRS period, our results suggest the opposite, i.e. value relevance is either disappeared or counter active in post-IFRS period as compared to pre-IFRS period. However, significant accounting quality improvement is observed in restraining earnings management practices in post-IFRS period. Overall, the findings highlight a mix representation of accounting/disclosure quality in post-IFRS period, which suggest that accounting quality still remains as a matter of concern in delivering quality financial reporting. Our findings raise questions, in an asymmetric information environment, about long-term decision usefulness of accounting numbers and sustainable financial reporting practice in Australia. Policy makers, regulators, accounting standard setters, investors and other stakeholders should understand that for Australian companies the accounting quality journey has not fully achieved yet as per expectation even after adopting IFRS and more to be done in this direction. While some improvements are commendable, further road-map is warranted for sustainable financial reporting practices in Australian companies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚公司的可持续财务报告实践——质量重要吗?
本研究探讨了澳大利亚非金融上市公司在当前的报告实践(即后国际财务报告准则时期)中是否达到了会计和披露质量,以及股票市场是否对高质量的会计数字有足够的反应(即价值相关性)。鉴于国际财务报告准则在提高报告质量方面的作用,它探讨了2005年后的报告实践是否足够有效(即可持续),以减轻投资者和利益相关者对盈余管理的担忧,以及解释当前监管环境下的预测价值和回报。在2000-2014年的完整样本以及采用国际财务报告准则前和采用国际财务报告准则后的子样本中应用GLS回归,我们发现,与采用国际财务报告准则前相比,会计质量在解释国际财务报告准则后期间的盈利能力和现金流量变化方面略有改善。但是,在解释国际财务报告准则之前和之后期间的应收账款和销售额的变化方面没有取得重大进展。尽管预期会计信息在后国际财务报告准则期间具有高价值相关性,但我们的结果表明情况恰恰相反,即与前国际财务报告准则期间相比,在后国际财务报告准则期间的价值相关性要么消失,要么反活跃。然而,在国际财务报告准则之后的时期,会计质量的显著改善被观察到约束盈余管理实践。总体而言,调查结果强调了后国际财务报告准则时期会计/披露质量的混合表现,这表明会计质量仍然是提供高质量财务报告的关注事项。在信息不对称的环境下,我们的研究结果提出了关于澳大利亚会计数字和可持续财务报告实践的长期决策有用性的问题。政策制定者、监管机构、会计准则制定者、投资者和其他利益相关者应该明白,即使在采用国际财务报告准则后,澳大利亚公司的会计质量之路仍未完全达到预期,而且在这方面还有更多工作要做。虽然一些改进是值得赞扬的,但澳大利亚公司的可持续财务报告实践需要进一步的路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Earnings Announcement and Stock Prices of Quoted Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic Revisiting the Exchange Rate -Oil Price Nexus in Turbulent Period: What Can We Learn From Nigeria and South Africa During Covid-19? Trade Implications on Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIS) Due to COVID-19 Pandemic and India China Altercation Analysis of Non-Oil Exports – Economic Growth Relationship in Nigeria: The Role of Institutional Qualities Who are the Poor Farm households' in Nigeria and is this Population Changing Over Time?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1