[Ausencia por enfermedad, condiciones médicas y de trabajo durante el embarazo en una cohorte de profesionales sanitarias].

Rocío Villar Vinuesa, C. Serra, Laura Serra, F. G. Benavides
{"title":"[Ausencia por enfermedad, condiciones médicas y de trabajo durante el embarazo en una cohorte de profesionales sanitarias].","authors":"Rocío Villar Vinuesa, C. Serra, Laura Serra, F. G. Benavides","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2022.25.02.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo assess the association between sickness absence (SA) trajectories by medical diagnoses and exposure to occupational risk factors during pregnancy.  Methods: SA trajectories were identified in a cohort of 367 pregnant workers from a healthcare institution (period 2010-2014), based on most frequent diagnosis using sequence analysis. Trajectory 1 included SA episodes due mainly to musculoskeletal disorders (58.86%), trajectory 2 included SA episodes due to pregnancy-related disorders (25.07%) and trajectory 3 included absences mainly covered by pregnancy-related occupational risk benefits (POR) and few SA episodes (16.08%). Exposure to occupational risk factors was assessed by experts and their association with trajectories was analysed using logistic regression. Relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were adjusted for age, type of contract and work shift.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTrajectory 1 was negatively associated with exposure to safety and ergonomic risks (RR=0.56, 95%CI=0.35-0.90; RR=0.50, 95%CI=0.33-0.77, respectively) and with the highest global risk index (RR=0.68, 95%CI=0.49-0.96). Trajectory 3 was associated with safety and ergonomic risks (RR=2.75, 95%CI=1.59-4.75; RR=3.64, 95%CI=2.18-6.06, respectively) and with the highest global risk index (RR=2.69, 95%CI=1.43-5.01). Nursing aides and nurses had a higher probability of belonging to trajectory 3 (RR 5.58, 95%CI=2.09-14.95 and RR 5.00, 95%CI 2.18-6.06, respectively).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPregnancy-related and musculoskeletal disorders are the most frequent sickness absence diagnosis during pregnancy. Low levels of occupational risk factors exposure were related to absences from work covered mainly by sickness absence. Current social benefits seem to be used as a complementary way to balance work and health during pregnancy.","PeriodicalId":38326,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","volume":"25 2 1","pages":"101-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2022.25.02.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To assess the association between sickness absence (SA) trajectories by medical diagnoses and exposure to occupational risk factors during pregnancy.  Methods: SA trajectories were identified in a cohort of 367 pregnant workers from a healthcare institution (period 2010-2014), based on most frequent diagnosis using sequence analysis. Trajectory 1 included SA episodes due mainly to musculoskeletal disorders (58.86%), trajectory 2 included SA episodes due to pregnancy-related disorders (25.07%) and trajectory 3 included absences mainly covered by pregnancy-related occupational risk benefits (POR) and few SA episodes (16.08%). Exposure to occupational risk factors was assessed by experts and their association with trajectories was analysed using logistic regression. Relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were adjusted for age, type of contract and work shift. RESULTS Trajectory 1 was negatively associated with exposure to safety and ergonomic risks (RR=0.56, 95%CI=0.35-0.90; RR=0.50, 95%CI=0.33-0.77, respectively) and with the highest global risk index (RR=0.68, 95%CI=0.49-0.96). Trajectory 3 was associated with safety and ergonomic risks (RR=2.75, 95%CI=1.59-4.75; RR=3.64, 95%CI=2.18-6.06, respectively) and with the highest global risk index (RR=2.69, 95%CI=1.43-5.01). Nursing aides and nurses had a higher probability of belonging to trajectory 3 (RR 5.58, 95%CI=2.09-14.95 and RR 5.00, 95%CI 2.18-6.06, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Pregnancy-related and musculoskeletal disorders are the most frequent sickness absence diagnosis during pregnancy. Low levels of occupational risk factors exposure were related to absences from work covered mainly by sickness absence. Current social benefits seem to be used as a complementary way to balance work and health during pregnancy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[一组卫生专业人员在怀孕期间因疾病、医疗条件和工作条件缺勤]。
目的评估医学诊断的缺勤(SA)轨迹与妊娠期间暴露于职业危险因素之间的关系。方法:基于使用序列分析的最常见诊断,在一家医疗机构(2010-2014年)的367名怀孕女工队列中确定SA轨迹。轨迹1包括主要由肌肉骨骼疾病引起的SA发作(58.86%),轨迹2包括由妊娠相关疾病引起的SA发作(25.07%),轨迹3包括主要由妊娠相关职业风险获益(POR)引起的缺课和很少SA发作(16.08%)。专家评估了职业风险因素的暴露情况,并使用逻辑回归分析了它们与轨迹的关联。相对危险度(RR)及其95%置信区间(95% ci)根据年龄、合同类型和工作班次进行调整。结果轨迹1与暴露于安全和人体工程学风险呈负相关(RR=0.56, 95%CI=0.35-0.90;RR=0.50, 95%CI=0.33-0.77),整体风险指数最高(RR=0.68, 95%CI=0.49-0.96)。轨迹3与安全性和人体工程学风险相关(RR=2.75, 95%CI=1.59-4.75;RR=3.64, 95%CI=2.18-6.06),整体风险指数最高(RR=2.69, 95%CI=1.43-5.01)。护理助理和护士属于轨迹3的概率较高(RR为5.58,95%CI=2.09-14.95, RR为5.00,95%CI为2.18-6.06)。结论妊娠相关疾病和肌肉骨骼疾病是妊娠期最常见的缺勤诊断。低水平的职业风险因素暴露与缺勤有关,主要是因病缺勤。目前的社会福利似乎被用作怀孕期间平衡工作和健康的补充方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa de posible origen laboral atendida en el Servicio Navarro de Salud. Navarra, España, 2017-2022 Enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa de posible origen laboral atendida en el Servicio Navarro de Salud. Navarra, España, 2017-2022 Producción científica en Scopus sobre salud financiera: periodo 2011-2022 Exposición a sílice de mineros en altitud. Dosis inhalada, método de evaluación en condición de hipobaria El sello de calidad FECYT, un reconocimiento y un estímulo para Archivos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1