[Telework: Data and evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic].

Fernando Benavides, Michael Silva-Peñaherrera
{"title":"[Telework: Data and evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic].","authors":"Fernando Benavides, Michael Silva-Peñaherrera","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2022.25.02.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This short essay starts from the hypothesis that teleworking is nothing more, and nothing less, than the manifestation of an announced change of time, of which the pandemic is acting as an accelerator. A change of era defined by a new economic and labor space that is cyberspace, which deepens the digitization of the economy and the flexibilization of the labor market. Teleworking is an expected result in this new reality. The pandemic has exponentially increased this new form of work organization, defined as work done at home using electronic equipment. From a global perspective, the ILO has estimated, based on household surveys of 31 countries carried out in the second quarter of 2020, that 17.4% of the employed people worldwide, some 557 million, worked in that sector. period in their homes, ranging from 25.4% in high-income countries to 13.6% in low-income countries. For Latin America, teleworking rose between 25-30% in the second quarter of 2020, and in Europe, Eurofound, in April 2020, estimated that 37% of participants had started working at home with the onset of the pandemic. All of which has made it possible to maintain certain economic activity and the employment relationship of these people during the pandemic. Likewise, it should not be forgotten that the pandemic has also caused huge job losses, especially during the second quarter of 2020, when, according to ILO estimates, more than 300 million full-time jobs were lost. Job losses that as of the 2nd quarter of 2021 have not yet recovered from pre-pandemic levels. In this sense, it should not be forgotten that teleworking does not create new occupations, it only provides a new way of organizing work for those occupations whose tasks can be performed virtually. At the time of writing this article, after a year of restrictions on economic activity, mobility and social interaction, the surveys that Eurofound has continued to carry out show that exclusive teleworking, every day of the week, is decreasing in the whole of the European Union, from 34% in summer 2020 (second round) to 24% in spring 2021 (third round). Given that the pandemic has not yet ended, and we do not know how the \"experiment\" will end, we must continue to monitor these changes in the way of working, and how they affect the labor market and employment and working conditions. As far as we know, teleworking offers great advantages, but also important disadvantages, with respect to working and employment conditions, which can, positively or negatively, affect the health of the teleworker. Telework regulation is a key element of cyberspace-based regulation of the digital economy, and it must be a global issue.","PeriodicalId":38326,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","volume":"25 2 1","pages":"133-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2022.25.02.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This short essay starts from the hypothesis that teleworking is nothing more, and nothing less, than the manifestation of an announced change of time, of which the pandemic is acting as an accelerator. A change of era defined by a new economic and labor space that is cyberspace, which deepens the digitization of the economy and the flexibilization of the labor market. Teleworking is an expected result in this new reality. The pandemic has exponentially increased this new form of work organization, defined as work done at home using electronic equipment. From a global perspective, the ILO has estimated, based on household surveys of 31 countries carried out in the second quarter of 2020, that 17.4% of the employed people worldwide, some 557 million, worked in that sector. period in their homes, ranging from 25.4% in high-income countries to 13.6% in low-income countries. For Latin America, teleworking rose between 25-30% in the second quarter of 2020, and in Europe, Eurofound, in April 2020, estimated that 37% of participants had started working at home with the onset of the pandemic. All of which has made it possible to maintain certain economic activity and the employment relationship of these people during the pandemic. Likewise, it should not be forgotten that the pandemic has also caused huge job losses, especially during the second quarter of 2020, when, according to ILO estimates, more than 300 million full-time jobs were lost. Job losses that as of the 2nd quarter of 2021 have not yet recovered from pre-pandemic levels. In this sense, it should not be forgotten that teleworking does not create new occupations, it only provides a new way of organizing work for those occupations whose tasks can be performed virtually. At the time of writing this article, after a year of restrictions on economic activity, mobility and social interaction, the surveys that Eurofound has continued to carry out show that exclusive teleworking, every day of the week, is decreasing in the whole of the European Union, from 34% in summer 2020 (second round) to 24% in spring 2021 (third round). Given that the pandemic has not yet ended, and we do not know how the "experiment" will end, we must continue to monitor these changes in the way of working, and how they affect the labor market and employment and working conditions. As far as we know, teleworking offers great advantages, but also important disadvantages, with respect to working and employment conditions, which can, positively or negatively, affect the health of the teleworker. Telework regulation is a key element of cyberspace-based regulation of the digital economy, and it must be a global issue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[远程办公:2019冠状病毒病大流行之前和期间的数据和证据]。
这篇短文的出发点是这样一个假设,即远程办公无非是一种已宣布的时代变化的表现,而疫情正充当着时代变化的加速器。网络空间这一新的经济和劳动空间所定义的时代变革,深化了经济的数字化和劳动力市场的灵活性。远程办公是这种新现实的预期结果。大流行使这种新的工作组织形式成倍增加,这种工作组织形式被定义为在家中使用电子设备完成的工作。从全球角度来看,国际劳工组织根据2020年第二季度对31个国家进行的住户调查估计,全球17.4%的就业人口,约5.57亿人在该部门工作。从高收入国家的25.4%到低收入国家的13.6%不等。就拉丁美洲而言,2020年第二季度远程办公人数增长了25%至30%,而在欧洲,据欧洲联盟估计,2020年4月,37%的参与者在疫情爆发时开始在家工作。所有这些都使这些人在大流行期间能够保持某些经济活动和就业关系。同样,不应忘记,大流行也造成了大量失业,特别是在2020年第二季度,根据国际劳工组织的估计,当时失去了3亿多份全职工作。截至2021年第二季度,失业人数尚未从大流行前的水平恢复。从这个意义上说,我们不应该忘记,远程办公并没有创造新的职业,它只是为那些可以虚拟执行任务的职业提供了一种组织工作的新方式。在撰写本文时,在对经济活动、流动性和社会互动进行了一年的限制之后,Eurofound继续进行的调查显示,在整个欧盟,每周每天的专属远程办公比例正在下降,从2020年夏季(第二轮)的34%降至2021年春季(第三轮)的24%。鉴于大流行尚未结束,我们不知道“实验”将如何结束,我们必须继续监测工作方式的这些变化,以及它们如何影响劳动力市场、就业和工作条件。据我们所知,远程办公提供了巨大的优势,但也有重要的缺点,就工作和就业条件而言,这可以,积极或消极地影响远程工作者的健康。远程办公监管是基于网络空间的数字经济监管的关键要素,必须是一个全球性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa de posible origen laboral atendida en el Servicio Navarro de Salud. Navarra, España, 2017-2022 Enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa de posible origen laboral atendida en el Servicio Navarro de Salud. Navarra, España, 2017-2022 Producción científica en Scopus sobre salud financiera: periodo 2011-2022 Exposición a sílice de mineros en altitud. Dosis inhalada, método de evaluación en condición de hipobaria El sello de calidad FECYT, un reconocimiento y un estímulo para Archivos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1