Arakawa and Gins’s Nonplace: An Approach from an Apophatic Aesthetics

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Journal of Japanese Philosophy Pub Date : 2014-07-01 DOI:10.1353/JJP.2014.0005
Raquel Bouso García
{"title":"Arakawa and Gins’s Nonplace: An Approach from an Apophatic Aesthetics","authors":"Raquel Bouso García","doi":"10.1353/JJP.2014.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the expression “apophatic aesthetics,” Amador Vega names different cases of twentieth-century hermeneutics of negativity that show a spiritual debt to negative theology and in particular to the major mystical trends of Medieval Europe. Our aim here is to explore how this category applies to the artistic work created by the contemporary artists Arakawa and Gins. However, our focus is not on the debt of these artists to apophatism in the Christian tradition but in Buddhism, especially in Zen. Through an analysis of various artworks, the article intends to determine the reminiscences of the evocation of emptiness in Zen-related arts. By so doing, despite the lack of continuity with tradition, it seems possible to uncover certain links with Japanese classic aesthetics. At the same time, since emptiness is a notion revisited in modern Japanese thought, the paper raises the question of its role as an ascetic way of thought, capable of avoiding conceptual limitations and thus opening new paths to philosophy. In this sense, insofar as thinkers well known as critics of modernity, such as Lyotard, Danto, or Taylor, have dialogued with Arakawa and Gins’s artistic proposal, a connection between certain aspects of Japanese philosophy and so-called postmodern thought is suggested.","PeriodicalId":29679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Japanese Philosophy","volume":"27 1","pages":"103 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/JJP.2014.0005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Japanese Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JJP.2014.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the expression “apophatic aesthetics,” Amador Vega names different cases of twentieth-century hermeneutics of negativity that show a spiritual debt to negative theology and in particular to the major mystical trends of Medieval Europe. Our aim here is to explore how this category applies to the artistic work created by the contemporary artists Arakawa and Gins. However, our focus is not on the debt of these artists to apophatism in the Christian tradition but in Buddhism, especially in Zen. Through an analysis of various artworks, the article intends to determine the reminiscences of the evocation of emptiness in Zen-related arts. By so doing, despite the lack of continuity with tradition, it seems possible to uncover certain links with Japanese classic aesthetics. At the same time, since emptiness is a notion revisited in modern Japanese thought, the paper raises the question of its role as an ascetic way of thought, capable of avoiding conceptual limitations and thus opening new paths to philosophy. In this sense, insofar as thinkers well known as critics of modernity, such as Lyotard, Danto, or Taylor, have dialogued with Arakawa and Gins’s artistic proposal, a connection between certain aspects of Japanese philosophy and so-called postmodern thought is suggested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荒川和金斯的非场所:一种来自冷漠美学的方法
阿马多尔·维加用“悲观美学”一词,列举了20世纪不同的消极性解释学案例,这些案例显示了消极神学的精神债务,特别是中世纪欧洲的主要神秘主义趋势。我们在这里的目的是探索这一类别如何适用于当代艺术家荒川和金斯的艺术作品。然而,我们关注的重点不是这些艺术家对基督教传统中的避光主义的亏欠,而是对佛教,尤其是禅宗的亏欠。本文试图通过对各种艺术作品的分析,来确定禅宗艺术中空性唤起的回忆。通过这样做,尽管缺乏与传统的连续性,但似乎有可能发现与日本古典美学的某些联系。同时,由于空性是现代日本思想中重新审视的一个概念,本文提出了空性作为一种禁欲主义思想方式的角色问题,它能够避免概念上的限制,从而开辟新的哲学道路。从这个意义上说,就像利奥塔德、丹托或泰勒等著名的现代性批评家与荒川和金斯的艺术建议进行对话一样,日本哲学的某些方面与所谓的后现代思想之间存在联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toward a Dialectics of Emptiness: Overcoming Nihilism and Combatting Mechanization in Nishitani Keiji’s Postwar Thought The Influence of Chinese Sources on the Formation of Philosophy in the Tokyo School: Focusing on Kuwaki Gen’yoku Race, Buddhism, and the Formation of Oriental (Tōyō) Philosophy in Meiji Japan Ōmori Shōzō and Kotodama Theory: How Can We Overcome the Need for Bodily Encounters? Reply to Laÿna Droz’s Review of Watsuji on Nature: Japanese Philosophy in the Wake of Heidegger
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1