Theory and Politics in Karatani Kōjin’s The Structure of World History

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Journal of Japanese Philosophy Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI:10.1353/JJP.2016.0005
K. Goonewardena
{"title":"Theory and Politics in Karatani Kōjin’s The Structure of World History","authors":"K. Goonewardena","doi":"10.1353/JJP.2016.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First, this article seeks to demonstrate why Karatani Kōjin’s The Structure of World History offers a unique and pioneering contribution to Marxist theory in particular and radical thought more generally. In so doing, it examines Karatani’s key conceptual innovations that enable to him to open up a novel perspective on world history and propose a revolutionary political program—one drawing from Kantian anarchism as much as Marxian communism. Particular attention is paid to the central concept that Karatani deploys in this work—exchange or intercourse, which is derived from Marx’s use of the term Verkehr—in order to examine critically the formidable case he makes for replacing the classical Marxist concept of the “mode of production” with the “mode of exchange.” The article argues that Karatani’s novelty and attraction lies in his production of a new concept of history by means of a new concept of social totality, which invites him to be read alongside other leading thinkers in the orbit of Marxism such as Hegel, Althusser, Braudel, and Lefebvre. In conclusion, the article highlights an illuminating ambiguity in Karatani’s conception of exchange, arguing that it is in the light of this that his political conclusions are most productively studied.","PeriodicalId":29679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Japanese Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/JJP.2016.0005","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Japanese Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JJP.2016.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

First, this article seeks to demonstrate why Karatani Kōjin’s The Structure of World History offers a unique and pioneering contribution to Marxist theory in particular and radical thought more generally. In so doing, it examines Karatani’s key conceptual innovations that enable to him to open up a novel perspective on world history and propose a revolutionary political program—one drawing from Kantian anarchism as much as Marxian communism. Particular attention is paid to the central concept that Karatani deploys in this work—exchange or intercourse, which is derived from Marx’s use of the term Verkehr—in order to examine critically the formidable case he makes for replacing the classical Marxist concept of the “mode of production” with the “mode of exchange.” The article argues that Karatani’s novelty and attraction lies in his production of a new concept of history by means of a new concept of social totality, which invites him to be read alongside other leading thinkers in the orbit of Marxism such as Hegel, Althusser, Braudel, and Lefebvre. In conclusion, the article highlights an illuminating ambiguity in Karatani’s conception of exchange, arguing that it is in the light of this that his political conclusions are most productively studied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡拉塔尼Kōjin《世界历史的结构》中的理论与政治
首先,本文试图证明为什么卡拉塔尼Kōjin的《世界历史的结构》对马克思主义理论和激进思想做出了独特而开创性的贡献。在此过程中,本书考察了卡拉塔尼的关键概念创新,这些创新使他能够打开一个关于世界历史的新视角,并提出了一个革命的政治纲领——既借鉴了康德式的无政府主义,也借鉴了马克思主义的共产主义。本书特别关注了卡拉塔尼在本书中运用的核心概念——交换或交往,这一概念源于马克思对“维克尔”一词的使用——以便批判性地审视他提出的用“交换方式”取代经典马克思主义“生产方式”概念的可怕案例。文章认为,卡拉塔尼的新颖和吸引力在于他通过一种新的社会整体概念产生了一种新的历史概念,这使得他与马克思主义轨道上的其他主要思想家(如黑格尔、阿尔都塞、布罗代尔和列斐弗尔)一起被阅读。最后,这篇文章强调了卡拉塔尼交换概念中一个具有启发意义的模糊之处,认为正是在这个基础上,他的政治结论才得到了最有成效的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toward a Dialectics of Emptiness: Overcoming Nihilism and Combatting Mechanization in Nishitani Keiji’s Postwar Thought The Influence of Chinese Sources on the Formation of Philosophy in the Tokyo School: Focusing on Kuwaki Gen’yoku Race, Buddhism, and the Formation of Oriental (Tōyō) Philosophy in Meiji Japan Ōmori Shōzō and Kotodama Theory: How Can We Overcome the Need for Bodily Encounters? Reply to Laÿna Droz’s Review of Watsuji on Nature: Japanese Philosophy in the Wake of Heidegger
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1