Saying Yes when Meaning No

Michael T. Dreznick, J. M. Cronin, C. K. Waterman, C. Glasheen
{"title":"Saying Yes when Meaning No","authors":"Michael T. Dreznick, J. M. Cronin, C. K. Waterman, C. Glasheen","doi":"10.1300/J056v15n01_06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Token seduction was defined as signaling an interest in having sex with another person when one has no intention of having sex. Gender differences in token seduction, various token seduction behaviors, and personality predictors of token seduction were investigated. The gender difference in token seduction was nonsignificant. Men engaged in verbal token seduction behaviors significantly more often than women. Women and men did not differ significantly in how often they engaged in physical token seduction behaviors. Women engaged in physical token seduction behaviors significantly more often than verbal ones, while men did not differ significantly in their use of physical and verbal behaviors. Hypergender ideology predicted token seduction for men only. Machiavellianism predicted token seduction for women and men.","PeriodicalId":85015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychology & human sexuality","volume":"15 1","pages":"69 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J056v15n01_06","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychology & human sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v15n01_06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Token seduction was defined as signaling an interest in having sex with another person when one has no intention of having sex. Gender differences in token seduction, various token seduction behaviors, and personality predictors of token seduction were investigated. The gender difference in token seduction was nonsignificant. Men engaged in verbal token seduction behaviors significantly more often than women. Women and men did not differ significantly in how often they engaged in physical token seduction behaviors. Women engaged in physical token seduction behaviors significantly more often than verbal ones, while men did not differ significantly in their use of physical and verbal behaviors. Hypergender ideology predicted token seduction for men only. Machiavellianism predicted token seduction for women and men.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
明明想说“不”却说“是”
象征性诱惑被定义为当一个人无意与另一个人发生性关系时,表示有兴趣与另一个人发生性关系。研究了符号诱惑的性别差异、各种符号诱惑行为以及符号诱惑的人格预测因素。符号诱惑的性别差异不显著。男性明显比女性更频繁地进行口头象征性的诱惑行为。女性和男性在进行身体象征性诱惑行为的频率上没有显著差异。女性进行肢体引诱的频率明显高于言语引诱,而男性在肢体引诱和言语引诱的频率上没有显著差异。超性别意识形态预示着象征性的诱惑只会发生在男性身上。马基雅维利主义预言了男女之间象征性的诱惑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sexuality through the Life Stages, Part III Sexuality through the Life Stages, Part IV Modern Human Male Anatomy and Physiology Sexual Health Sexuality through the Life Stages, Part II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1