The Evolution of Plasticity in Female-Female Desire

L. Diamond
{"title":"The Evolution of Plasticity in Female-Female Desire","authors":"L. Diamond","doi":"10.1300/J056v18n04_01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Previous psychological and anthropological research suggests that female-female desires show greater variability and plasticity than do male-male desires. I argue that plasticity in female-female desire has its origins in the evolved independence between female proceptivity (i.e., motivation to initiate sexual activity) and female arousability (i.e., capacity to become aroused to sexual stimuli), which evolved in concert with the loss of a circumscribed and observable period of estrus in higher primates. Proceptivity is an intrinsically cyclical system, peaking during ovulationwhen estrogen levels are highest, whereas arousability is continuous and hormone-independent. Because female proceptivity peaks only a few days per month, a relatively greater proportion of women's day-to-day desires is governed by arousability. The opposite is true for males, who experience continuously high proceptivity mediated by their continuously high androgen levels. Moreover, because arousability is a responsive rather than an initiatory system, there would have been little evolutionary benefit to “orienting” this system exclusively toward other-sex partners. Therefore, arousability likely permits sexual desires for both sexes. Women will consequently have more opportunities than men to experience situationally-triggered same-sex desires, regardless of their underlying sexual orientation. The implications of this perspective for understanding different manifestations of same-sex sexuality are discussed. doi:10.1300/J056v18n04_01","PeriodicalId":85015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychology & human sexuality","volume":"18 1","pages":"245 - 274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J056v18n04_01","citationCount":"65","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychology & human sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v18n04_01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

Abstract

Abstract Previous psychological and anthropological research suggests that female-female desires show greater variability and plasticity than do male-male desires. I argue that plasticity in female-female desire has its origins in the evolved independence between female proceptivity (i.e., motivation to initiate sexual activity) and female arousability (i.e., capacity to become aroused to sexual stimuli), which evolved in concert with the loss of a circumscribed and observable period of estrus in higher primates. Proceptivity is an intrinsically cyclical system, peaking during ovulationwhen estrogen levels are highest, whereas arousability is continuous and hormone-independent. Because female proceptivity peaks only a few days per month, a relatively greater proportion of women's day-to-day desires is governed by arousability. The opposite is true for males, who experience continuously high proceptivity mediated by their continuously high androgen levels. Moreover, because arousability is a responsive rather than an initiatory system, there would have been little evolutionary benefit to “orienting” this system exclusively toward other-sex partners. Therefore, arousability likely permits sexual desires for both sexes. Women will consequently have more opportunities than men to experience situationally-triggered same-sex desires, regardless of their underlying sexual orientation. The implications of this perspective for understanding different manifestations of same-sex sexuality are discussed. doi:10.1300/J056v18n04_01
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性-女性欲望的可塑性演化
以往的心理学和人类学研究表明,女性对女性的欲望比男性对男性的欲望表现出更大的可变性和可塑性。我认为,雌性-雌性欲望的可塑性源于雌性感知能力(即发起性活动的动机)和雌性唤起能力(即被性刺激唤醒的能力)之间的进化独立性,这是随着高等灵长类动物失去了一个受限制的、可观察的发情期而进化的。感受性是一个内在的周期性系统,在排卵期间雌激素水平最高时达到顶峰,而唤起性是连续的,不依赖于激素。因为女性的感知能力每个月只有几天达到高峰,所以女性的日常欲望中相对较大的比例是由可唤起性控制的。男性的情况正好相反,他们经历了持续的高感知能力,这是由他们持续的高雄激素水平介导的。此外,因为可唤起性是一个反应性系统,而不是一个启动系统,所以把这个系统只“定向”给异性伴侣对进化几乎没有好处。因此,性唤起可能允许两性的性欲。因此,女性将比男性有更多的机会体验情境引发的同性欲望,而不管其潜在的性取向如何。本文讨论了这一观点对理解同性性行为不同表现形式的影响。doi: 10.1300 / J056v18n04_01
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sexuality through the Life Stages, Part III Sexuality through the Life Stages, Part IV Modern Human Male Anatomy and Physiology Sexual Health Sexuality through the Life Stages, Part II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1