Failure characteristics and mechanical mechanism of study on red sandstone with combined defects

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Geomechanics and Engineering Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.12989/GAE.2021.24.2.179
Bingquan Chen, Zhiguo Xia, Yadong Xu, Shuai Liu, Xingzong Liu
{"title":"Failure characteristics and mechanical mechanism of study on red sandstone with combined defects","authors":"Bingquan Chen, Zhiguo Xia, Yadong Xu, Shuai Liu, Xingzong Liu","doi":"10.12989/GAE.2021.24.2.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the strength and failure mechanism of red sandstones with combined defects were investigated by uniaxial compression tests on red sandstones with different crack angles using two-dimensional particle flow code numerical software, and their mechanical parameters and failure process were studied and analyzed. The results showed that the mechanical characteristics such as peak strength, peak strain, and elastic modulus of the samples with prefabricated combined defects were significantly inferior than those of the intact samples. With increasing crack angle from 15° to 60°, the weakening area of cracks increased, elastic modulus, peak strength, and peak strain gradually reduced, the total number of cracks increased, and more strain energy was released. In addition, the samples underwent initial brittle failure to plastic failure stage, and the failure form was more significant, leading to peeling phenomenon. However, with increasing crack angle from 75° to 90°, the crack–hole combination shared the stress concentration at the tip of the crack–crack combination, resulted in a gradual increase in elastic modulus, peak strain and peak strength, but a decrease in the number of total cracks, the release of strain energy reduced, the plastic failure state weakened, and the spalling phenomenon slowed down. On this basis, the samples with 30° and 45&degcrack-crack combination were selected for further experimental investigation. Through comparative analysis between the experimental and simulation results, the failure strength and final failure mode with cracks propagation of samples were found to be relatively similar.","PeriodicalId":12602,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12989/GAE.2021.24.2.179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this study, the strength and failure mechanism of red sandstones with combined defects were investigated by uniaxial compression tests on red sandstones with different crack angles using two-dimensional particle flow code numerical software, and their mechanical parameters and failure process were studied and analyzed. The results showed that the mechanical characteristics such as peak strength, peak strain, and elastic modulus of the samples with prefabricated combined defects were significantly inferior than those of the intact samples. With increasing crack angle from 15° to 60°, the weakening area of cracks increased, elastic modulus, peak strength, and peak strain gradually reduced, the total number of cracks increased, and more strain energy was released. In addition, the samples underwent initial brittle failure to plastic failure stage, and the failure form was more significant, leading to peeling phenomenon. However, with increasing crack angle from 75° to 90°, the crack–hole combination shared the stress concentration at the tip of the crack–crack combination, resulted in a gradual increase in elastic modulus, peak strain and peak strength, but a decrease in the number of total cracks, the release of strain energy reduced, the plastic failure state weakened, and the spalling phenomenon slowed down. On this basis, the samples with 30° and 45°crack-crack combination were selected for further experimental investigation. Through comparative analysis between the experimental and simulation results, the failure strength and final failure mode with cracks propagation of samples were found to be relatively similar.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
红砂岩复合缺陷破坏特征及力学机理研究
采用二维颗粒流码数值软件对不同裂纹角度的红砂岩进行单轴压缩试验,研究含复合缺陷红砂岩的强度和破坏机理,并对其力学参数和破坏过程进行研究和分析。结果表明:预制组合缺陷试样的峰值强度、峰值应变、弹性模量等力学特性明显低于完整缺陷试样;随着裂纹角度从15°增加到60°,裂纹的弱化面积增大,弹性模量、峰值强度和峰值应变逐渐减小,裂纹总数增加,释放的应变能更多。此外,试样经历了初始脆性破坏到塑性破坏阶段,破坏形式更为显著,导致剥落现象。而随着裂纹角从75°增加到90°,裂纹-孔组合在裂纹-裂纹组合的尖端共同分担应力集中,导致弹性模量、峰值应变和峰值强度逐渐增大,但总裂纹数减少,应变能释放减少,塑性破坏状态减弱,剥落现象减缓。在此基础上,选取30°和45°开裂-裂纹组合的试样进行进一步的试验研究。通过对试验结果和模拟结果的对比分析,发现试样的破坏强度和最终破坏模式随裂纹扩展较为相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geomechanics and Engineering
Geomechanics and Engineering ENGINEERING, CIVIL-ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Geomechanics and Engineering aims at opening an easy access to the valuable source of information and providing an excellent publication channel for the global community of researchers in the geomechanics and its applications. Typical subjects covered by the journal include: - Analytical, computational, and experimental multiscale and interaction mechanics- Computational and Theoretical Geomechnics- Foundations- Tunneling- Earth Structures- Site Characterization- Soil-Structure Interactions
期刊最新文献
An analytical approach to estimate the mechanical state of roof strata in underground longwall mining Investigating of free vibration behavior of bidirectional FG beams resting on variable elastic foundation Evaluation of grout penetration in single rock fracture using electrical resistivity Study on lateral behavior of digging well foundation with consideration of soil-foundation interaction A novel preloading method for foundation underpinning for the remodeling of an existing building
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1